improvements from pcl threads/fat dissolver in the nasolabial area subcutaneously.

fucking incredible shit man. still just PDOs in your lips? ridiculous change if so
 
  • +1
Reactions: ㅤㅤㅤㅤClavicular and Orc
fucking incredible shit man. still just PDOs in your lips? ridiculous change if so
yeah, pcl mostly.

I posted my design, once my upper lip became better my lip seal automatically improved.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NorwoodAscender
only temporally, I have a device for it.



towards the mecca, this ensures maximum testosterone production.
Ok now that I know you’re definitely mocking the religion. @asdvek @SecularIslamist @shia.jihadist

What are your thoughts on this since ur all Muslims
 
Ok now that I know you’re definitely mocking the religion. @asdvek @SecularIslamist @shia.jihadist

What are your thoughts on this since ur all Muslims
No he's not, he's right actually. Face towards to mecca when you're doing your pdo threads and looksmax stuff
 
No he's not, he's right actually. Face towards to mecca when you're doing your pdo threads and looksmax stuff
Ur even a cuck to ur own religion wow.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 97baHater and Orc
Ok now that I know you’re definitely mocking the religion. @asdvek @SecularIslamist @shia.jihadist

What are your thoughts on this since ur all Muslims
When God and His Messenger have decreed a matter, they (the believers) should not have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys God and His Messenger; he has indeed strayed into a plain error.
 
  • +1
Reactions: narcomogs
Al-Tirmidhi (1456), Abu Dawud (4462) and Ibn Majah (2561) narrated that Ibn `Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said:

“Whoever you find doing the action of the people of Lut, execute the one who does it and the one to whom it is done.” (Classed as sahih by al-Albani in Sahih al-Tirmidhi)

“And (remember) Lut (Lot), when he said to his people: ‘Do you commit the worst sin such as none preceding you has committed in the ‘Alamin (mankind and jinn)? ’Verily, you practice your lusts on men instead of women. Nay, but you are a people transgressing beyond bounds (by committing great sins).’

And the answer of his people was only that they said: ‘Drive them out of your town, these are indeed men who want to be pure (from sins)!’ Then We saved him and his family, except his wife; she was of those who remained behind (in the torment). And We rained down on them a rain (of stones). Then see what was the end of the Mujrimun (criminals, polytheists and sinners)” [al-A’raf 7:80-84]
based kill all fags pill
Ok now that I know you’re definitely mocking the religion. @asdvek @SecularIslamist @shia.jihadist

What are your thoughts on this since ur all Muslims
hes right though you have to pray towards Mecca
 
  • +1
Reactions: 97baHater, SecularIslamist and Orc
Nice thread tho. What would you rate yourself facially bhai?
 
Why is your right side of your mandible so big compared to your left? In the video, looks like giga asymetric
light, there's not actually that much difference irl.
 
good stuff
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orc
yeah, pcl mostly.

I posted my design, once my upper lip became better my lip seal automatically improved.
yeah, i would assume ur lips are perceived as wider as well? since the corners are more visible?
 
yeah, i would assume ur lips are perceived as wider as well? since the corners are more visible?
yeah that's also what causes mouths to look small in most cases.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 97baHater
View attachment 3137246
As you all know there's many theories pertaining the nasolabial fold, most of which revolve around bone recession, mainly the nasal aperture widening with age and the canine fossa becoming deeper, there's also some about volume loss, after carefully contemplating all of these while working on a solution, I've come to the conclusion that's it's all a load of horse shit, luckily cosmetologists aren't actual scientists, but you should still blame them for regurgitating this garbage.

now what causes it then? and why are you so sure it's not from that?

the answer is simple, the age of onset doesn't match, most people develop nasolabial folds before they're 30, or have them from birth, you haven't experienced any significant of bone recession at that age to attributing it to this is downright retarded.

it's also unrelated to bone development, or phenotype, it doesn't matter how good your bones are or where you're from, pretty much every sub-group of humans has them on average, and even if you've got the best bones on the planet it still won't prevent you from getting them, it's also unrelated to your forward growth, who gets them and who doesn't seems completely random, with them being absent in many flat-faced people, and them being present in those with the best forward growth.

View attachment 3137254

View attachment 3137255View attachment 3137256
there's also the argument that it's from 'recession' but in-case you don't realize this, what's deemed a deformity, or recession, is based on the average, so when the average human has this feature, then you cannot attribute it to recession, it's just a feature at that point, if everyone is deformed, then nobody is deformed.

then what causes then? as with almost all answers in life, it's the most benign, simplest concept you can imagine.

it's most likely just gravity, to be specific, gravity causes the fat in your face to migrate, and this process starts below the eyes, and covers part of the cheek.
View attachment 3137259

so you ask, is that not volume loss? to be specific, it's volume migration and accumulation, there's no actual volume lost in the nasolabial area, there's fat piling up on the outer fold of the nasolabial, this area seems to act as a 'net' where fat can't migrate any further, which leads to the iconic look, this is probably due to the thick superficial vein that runs underneath, whilst I was doing fat dissolving injections in this area I also noticed that no matter how hard you fuck up the dissolver won't move past this area, which means there's not much of a risk of accidentally removing fat from within the fold and making it worse.

but you can just get a (mid) facelift and fix it right?

well no, you can't, the volume in the area below the eyes cannot be restored with a facelift.

this is because when they're performed, a cut is made in front of the ear or at the temple, the skin is pulled towards this, which means the area below the eyes, and top of the cheek remains fucked, and it also doesn't resolve the accumulation that already took place, so in most cases the outline of a fold remains anyway, it does tend to make it less obvious, but it doesn't actually resolve the issue.


View attachment 3137262

there's more invasive procedures like a composite face lift (more complex form of a deep plane lift) that do address this issue, but a typical mid-face lift or S lift does not fix it.

View attachment 3137265

I've already resolved the issues I had with my skin in my past threads, the only issue I've got left is the piriform fossa.




so what can you do?

well unlike what cosmetologists think (and they're extremely afraid of this and won't do it for you), you should actually dissolve the fat that accumulated on the fold, because it's impossible to pull it back to where it came from without costly complex invasive procedures.

and you do this in combination with returning volume and skin laxity to the areas it diminished in, you can do this through fillers, implants, threads, or collagen promoting injections (there's many forms of these)

and before you ask, the last part isn't always the case, fat migration can happen without the area seemingly being diminished much, having nasolabial folds doesn't always mean your under-eyes are hollow, in these cases all that needs to be done is dissolving the ridge that has formed on the outer nasolabial.

but how do you do this?

you use deoxycholate, most clinics will not perform a liposection on this area, although it has been done before, and they will also not inject it for you, the most well known brand for this is aqualyx, and this is what I used for it.

performing the injections:

View attachment 3137266

you see this triangle shaped pad?
View attachment 3137267


this is where you put the injections.
View attachment 3137270

don't exceed half of 0.1 so 0.05 per injection, they're spaced roughly a centimeter apart, you'll need several treatments, the inflammation lasts about a week every time and the results are visible after 2-3 weeks, you can repeat it every third or fourth week, I used roughly 0.9 ml every time, so 3 syringes.

I used slins for this, that means insulin needles, they've got short high gauge needles and they're 0.3 to 0.5ml, these only need to go 5 mm deep, I insert them at an angle from below and work down.


View attachment 3137273

here's a video of my mid face area in motion right now, there's still a tiny bit of piriform fossa left but it's manageable and doesn't really show unless I tilt my head down.





by the way I also tightened by jawline at some point, and dissolved fat underneath.


Does it help w hollow cheeks?
 
here's an even closer close-up if anyone still doubts it.
 

Attachments

  • pea4jgo.mp4
    614 KB
  • +1
Reactions: 97baHater and ChetCrispy
I will do this
 
View attachment 3137246
As you all know there's many theories pertaining the nasolabial fold, most of which revolve around bone recession, mainly the nasal aperture widening with age and the canine fossa becoming deeper, there's also some about volume loss, after carefully contemplating all of these while working on a solution, I've come to the conclusion that's it's all a load of horse shit, luckily cosmetologists aren't actual scientists, but you should still blame them for regurgitating this garbage.

now what causes it then? and why are you so sure it's not from that?

the answer is simple, the age of onset doesn't match, most people develop nasolabial folds before they're 30, or have them from birth, you haven't experienced any significant of bone recession at that age to attributing it to this is downright retarded.

it's also unrelated to bone development, or phenotype, it doesn't matter how good your bones are or where you're from, pretty much every sub-group of humans has them on average, and even if you've got the best bones on the planet it still won't prevent you from getting them, it's also unrelated to your forward growth, who gets them and who doesn't seems completely random, with them being absent in many flat-faced people, and them being present in those with the best forward growth.

View attachment 3137254

View attachment 3137255View attachment 3137256
there's also the argument that it's from 'recession' but in-case you don't realize this, what's deemed a deformity, or recession, is based on the average, so when the average human has this feature, then you cannot attribute it to recession, it's just a feature at that point, if everyone is deformed, then nobody is deformed.

then what causes then? as with almost all answers in life, it's the most benign, simplest concept you can imagine.

it's most likely just gravity, to be specific, gravity causes the fat in your face to migrate, and this process starts below the eyes, and covers part of the cheek.
View attachment 3137259

so you ask, is that not volume loss? to be specific, it's volume migration and accumulation, there's no actual volume lost in the nasolabial area, there's fat piling up on the outer fold of the nasolabial, this area seems to act as a 'net' where fat can't migrate any further, which leads to the iconic look, this is probably due to the thick superficial vein that runs underneath, whilst I was doing fat dissolving injections in this area I also noticed that no matter how hard you fuck up the dissolver won't move past this area, which means there's not much of a risk of accidentally removing fat from within the fold and making it worse.

but you can just get a (mid) facelift and fix it right?

well no, you can't, the volume in the area below the eyes cannot be restored with a facelift.

this is because when they're performed, a cut is made in front of the ear or at the temple, the skin is pulled towards this, which means the area below the eyes, and top of the cheek remains fucked, and it also doesn't resolve the accumulation that already took place, so in most cases the outline of a fold remains anyway, it does tend to make it less obvious, but it doesn't actually resolve the issue.


View attachment 3137262

there's more invasive procedures like a composite face lift (more complex form of a deep plane lift) that do address this issue, but a typical mid-face lift or S lift does not fix it.

View attachment 3137265

I've already resolved the issues I had with my skin in my past threads, the only issue I've got left is the piriform fossa.




so what can you do?

well unlike what cosmetologists think (and they're extremely afraid of this and won't do it for you), you should actually dissolve the fat that accumulated on the fold, because it's impossible to pull it back to where it came from without costly complex invasive procedures.

and you do this in combination with returning volume and skin laxity to the areas it diminished in, you can do this through fillers, implants, threads, or collagen promoting injections (there's many forms of these)

and before you ask, the last part isn't always the case, fat migration can happen without the area seemingly being diminished much, having nasolabial folds doesn't always mean your under-eyes are hollow, in these cases all that needs to be done is dissolving the ridge that has formed on the outer nasolabial.

but how do you do this?

you use deoxycholate, most clinics will not perform a liposection on this area, although it has been done before, and they will also not inject it for you, the most well known brand for this is aqualyx, and this is what I used for it.

performing the injections:

View attachment 3137266

you see this triangle shaped pad?
View attachment 3137267


this is where you put the injections.
View attachment 3137270

don't exceed half of 0.1 so 0.05 per injection, they're spaced roughly a centimeter apart, you'll need several treatments, the inflammation lasts about a week every time and the results are visible after 2-3 weeks, you can repeat it every third or fourth week, I used roughly 0.9 ml every time, so 3 syringes.

I used slins for this, that means insulin needles, they've got short high gauge needles and they're 0.3 to 0.5ml, these only need to go 5 mm deep, I insert them at an angle from below and work down.


View attachment 3137273

here's a video of my mid face area in motion right now, there's still a tiny bit of piriform fossa left but it's manageable and doesn't really show unless I tilt my head down.





by the way I also tightened by jawline at some point, and dissolved fat underneath.


Man I always had this question
If you could remove the fat that has piled up and then reinject it somewhere else

Thank you for clearing this up, I most likely will do this.

Is it worth to get bone support/fat grafting done before or after removing naso folds?
 
Man I always had this question
If you could remove the fat that has piled up and then reinject it somewhere else

Thank you for clearing this up, I most likely will do this.

Is it worth to get bone support/fat grafting done before or after removing naso folds?
sadly you can't really fix the subcutaneous fat once it's been moved, so the only option is dissolving it partially so it doesn't build up on the fold.

nasolabial folds aren't actually a bone issue, or a fat issue in the fold itself, it's dislocated fat from elsewhere, there was never any volume lost in the fold itself, that is the mistake professionals keep making, they think somehow the fat in the fold itself went away and then end up making the area too full by injecting fillers in an area that didn't have volume to begin with.
 
  • +1
Reactions: N1666, JizzFarmer and greycel
sadly you can't really fix the subcutaneous fat once it's been moved, so the only option is dissolving it partially so it doesn't build up on the fold.

nasolabial folds aren't actually a bone issue, or a fat issue in the fold itself, it's dislocated fat from elsewhere, there was never any volume lost in the fold itself, that is the mistake professionals keep making, they think somehow the fat in the fold itself went away and then end up making the area too full by injecting fillers in an area that didn't have volume to begin with.
Ahh I see

Wait so if you dissolve the fat, then doesn't it remove it from piling up on the fold, causing the crease?
If no, then what's the point of dissolving the fat? To minimise the nasolabial crease?
Will dissolved fat make your nasolabial look worse when you get older or smth?

But the problem has essentially been fixed, even if the dissolved fat stays there, it won't cause the crease anymore..
 
Ahh I see

Wait so if you dissolve the fat, then doesn't it remove it from piling up on the fold, causing the crease?
If no, then what's the point of dissolving the fat? To minimise the nasolabial crease?
Will dissolved fat make your nasolabial look worse when you get older or smth?

But the problem has essentially been fixed, even if the dissolved fat stays there, it won't cause the crease anymore..
I can't make sense of your comment.


what I'm doing here is essentially just shaving off layers of fat underneath the skin to create a desirable contour in the area, so that it no longer creates a folding shape.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Any other injection area suggestion to get a define jaw like you ?
 
Any other injection area suggestion to get a define jaw like you ?
Underchin1


 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: JizzFarmer, lurks, Ryldoo IS COPING and 1 other person
View attachment 3137246
As you all know there's many theories pertaining the nasolabial fold, most of which revolve around bone recession, mainly the nasal aperture widening with age and the canine fossa becoming deeper, there's also some about volume loss, after carefully contemplating all of these while working on a solution, I've come to the conclusion that's it's all a load of horse shit, luckily cosmetologists aren't actual scientists, but you should still blame them for regurgitating this garbage.

now what causes it then? and why are you so sure it's not from that?

the answer is simple, the age of onset doesn't match, most people develop nasolabial folds before they're 30, or have them from birth, you haven't experienced any significant of bone recession at that age to attributing it to this is downright retarded.

it's also unrelated to bone development, or phenotype, it doesn't matter how good your bones are or where you're from, pretty much every sub-group of humans has them on average, and even if you've got the best bones on the planet it still won't prevent you from getting them, it's also unrelated to your forward growth, who gets them and who doesn't seems completely random, with them being absent in many flat-faced people, and them being present in those with the best forward growth.

View attachment 3137254

View attachment 3137255View attachment 3137256
there's also the argument that it's from 'recession' but in-case you don't realize this, what's deemed a deformity, or recession, is based on the average, so when the average human has this feature, then you cannot attribute it to recession, it's just a feature at that point, if everyone is deformed, then nobody is deformed.

then what causes then? as with almost all answers in life, it's the most benign, simplest concept you can imagine.

it's most likely just gravity, to be specific, gravity causes the fat in your face to migrate, and this process starts below the eyes, and covers part of the cheek.
View attachment 3137259

so you ask, is that not volume loss? to be specific, it's volume migration and accumulation, there's no actual volume lost in the nasolabial area, there's fat piling up on the outer fold of the nasolabial, this area seems to act as a 'net' where fat can't migrate any further, which leads to the iconic look, this is probably due to the thick superficial vein that runs underneath, whilst I was doing fat dissolving injections in this area I also noticed that no matter how hard you fuck up the dissolver won't move past this area, which means there's not much of a risk of accidentally removing fat from within the fold and making it worse.

but you can just get a (mid) facelift and fix it right?

well no, you can't, the volume in the area below the eyes cannot be restored with a facelift.

this is because when they're performed, a cut is made in front of the ear or at the temple, the skin is pulled towards this, which means the area below the eyes, and top of the cheek remains fucked, and it also doesn't resolve the accumulation that already took place, so in most cases the outline of a fold remains anyway, it does tend to make it less obvious, but it doesn't actually resolve the issue.


View attachment 3137262

there's more invasive procedures like a composite face lift (more complex form of a deep plane lift) that do address this issue, but a typical mid-face lift or S lift does not fix it.

View attachment 3137265

I've already resolved the issues I had with my skin in my past threads, the only issue I've got left is the piriform fossa.




so what can you do?

well unlike what cosmetologists think (and they're extremely afraid of this and won't do it for you), you should actually dissolve the fat that accumulated on the fold, because it's impossible to pull it back to where it came from without costly complex invasive procedures.

and you do this in combination with returning volume and skin laxity to the areas it diminished in, you can do this through fillers, implants, threads, or collagen promoting injections (there's many forms of these)

and before you ask, the last part isn't always the case, fat migration can happen without the area seemingly being diminished much, having nasolabial folds doesn't always mean your under-eyes are hollow, in these cases all that needs to be done is dissolving the ridge that has formed on the outer nasolabial.

but how do you do this?

you use deoxycholate, most clinics will not perform a liposection on this area, although it has been done before, and they will also not inject it for you, the most well known brand for this is aqualyx, and this is what I used for it.

performing the injections:

View attachment 3137266

you see this triangle shaped pad?
View attachment 3137267


this is where you put the injections.
View attachment 3137270

don't exceed half of 0.1 so 0.05 per injection, they're spaced roughly a centimeter apart, you'll need several treatments, the inflammation lasts about a week every time and the results are visible after 2-3 weeks, you can repeat it every third or fourth week, I used roughly 0.9 ml every time, so 3 syringes.

I used slins for this, that means insulin needles, they've got short high gauge needles and they're 0.3 to 0.5ml, these only need to go 5 mm deep, I insert them at an angle from below and work down.


View attachment 3137273

here's a video of my mid face area in motion right now, there's still a tiny bit of piriform fossa left but it's manageable and doesn't really show unless I tilt my head down.





by the way I also tightened by jawline at some point, and dissolved fat underneath.


yo, i saw a thread about injecting lipolab into the noses fat pad to reduce how bulbous it is, but wont that just leave the nose drooped down and leave it looking worse?
 
  • +1
Reactions: future_
matrixyl + argireline + vit c/e in the morning.
gentle cleanser for washing face + centella after showering.
0.5% liquid tretinoin in the evening.

(moisturize after all of these)

50 spf + PA++++ sunscreen with niacinamide
How quickly do you notice effects from matrixyl and argireline. Don't they take ages to even have effect? Also will it help my lines if im before the age of collagen break down?
 
How quickly do you notice effects from matrixyl and argireline. Don't they take ages to even have effect? Also will it help my lines if im before the age of collagen break down?
it takes forever, the reason I use them is because unlike retinoids matrixyl isn't deactivated by light exposure.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ynns
View attachment 3137246
As you all know there's many theories pertaining the nasolabial fold, most of which revolve around bone recession, mainly the nasal aperture widening with age and the canine fossa becoming deeper, there's also some about volume loss, after carefully contemplating all of these while working on a solution, I've come to the conclusion that's it's all a load of horse shit, luckily cosmetologists aren't actual scientists, but you should still blame them for regurgitating this garbage.

now what causes it then? and why are you so sure it's not from that?

the answer is simple, the age of onset doesn't match, most people develop nasolabial folds before they're 30, or have them from birth, you haven't experienced any significant of bone recession at that age to attributing it to this is downright retarded.

it's also unrelated to bone development, or phenotype, it doesn't matter how good your bones are or where you're from, pretty much every sub-group of humans has them on average, and even if you've got the best bones on the planet it still won't prevent you from getting them, it's also unrelated to your forward growth, who gets them and who doesn't seems completely random, with them being absent in many flat-faced people, and them being present in those with the best forward growth.

View attachment 3137254

View attachment 3137255View attachment 3137256
there's also the argument that it's from 'recession' but in-case you don't realize this, what's deemed a deformity, or recession, is based on the average, so when the average human has this feature, then you cannot attribute it to recession, it's just a feature at that point, if everyone is deformed, then nobody is deformed.

then what causes then? as with almost all answers in life, it's the most benign, simplest concept you can imagine.

it's most likely just gravity, to be specific, gravity causes the fat in your face to migrate, and this process starts below the eyes, and covers part of the cheek.
View attachment 3137259

so you ask, is that not volume loss? to be specific, it's volume migration and accumulation, there's no actual volume lost in the nasolabial area, there's fat piling up on the outer fold of the nasolabial, this area seems to act as a 'net' where fat can't migrate any further, which leads to the iconic look, this is probably due to the thick superficial vein that runs underneath, whilst I was doing fat dissolving injections in this area I also noticed that no matter how hard you fuck up the dissolver won't move past this area, which means there's not much of a risk of accidentally removing fat from within the fold and making it worse.

but you can just get a (mid) facelift and fix it right?

well no, you can't, the volume in the area below the eyes cannot be restored with a facelift.

this is because when they're performed, a cut is made in front of the ear or at the temple, the skin is pulled towards this, which means the area below the eyes, and top of the cheek remains fucked, and it also doesn't resolve the accumulation that already took place, so in most cases the outline of a fold remains anyway, it does tend to make it less obvious, but it doesn't actually resolve the issue.


View attachment 3137262

there's more invasive procedures like a composite face lift (more complex form of a deep plane lift) that do address this issue, but a typical mid-face lift or S lift does not fix it.

View attachment 3137265

I've already resolved the issues I had with my skin in my past threads, the only issue I've got left is the piriform fossa.




so what can you do?

well unlike what cosmetologists think (and they're extremely afraid of this and won't do it for you), you should actually dissolve the fat that accumulated on the fold, because it's impossible to pull it back to where it came from without costly complex invasive procedures.

and you do this in combination with returning volume and skin laxity to the areas it diminished in, you can do this through fillers, implants, threads, or collagen promoting injections (there's many forms of these)

and before you ask, the last part isn't always the case, fat migration can happen without the area seemingly being diminished much, having nasolabial folds doesn't always mean your under-eyes are hollow, in these cases all that needs to be done is dissolving the ridge that has formed on the outer nasolabial.

but how do you do this?

you use deoxycholate, most clinics will not perform a liposection on this area, although it has been done before, and they will also not inject it for you, the most well known brand for this is aqualyx, and this is what I used for it.

performing the injections:

View attachment 3137266

you see this triangle shaped pad?
View attachment 3137267


this is where you put the injections.
View attachment 3137270

don't exceed half of 0.1 so 0.05 per injection, they're spaced roughly a centimeter apart, you'll need several treatments, the inflammation lasts about a week every time and the results are visible after 2-3 weeks, you can repeat it every third or fourth week, I used roughly 0.9 ml every time, so 3 syringes.

I used slins for this, that means insulin needles, they've got short high gauge needles and they're 0.3 to 0.5ml, these only need to go 5 mm deep, I insert them at an angle from below and work down.


View attachment 3137273

here's a video of my mid face area in motion right now, there's still a tiny bit of piriform fossa left but it's manageable and doesn't really show unless I tilt my head down.





by the way I also tightened by jawline at some point, and dissolved fat underneath.


Great guide, curious about thou about the lip changes tbh, is it cause of the PDO threads you used on them, pretty big difference I gotta say
 
can't really fix the subcutaneous fat once it's been moved
I've seen some surgeons partially moved buccal (it's deeper and not subq ofc) fat to undereye area. Supposedly buccal fat is more resistant to loss.
 
Great guide, curious about thou about the lip changes tbh, is it cause of the PDO threads you used on them, pretty big difference I gotta say
1725283550196


the threads around my lips look like that, the blue areas have multiple, the red areas are singular.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Davidproton and Eiei
I've seen some surgeons partially moved buccal (it's deeper and not subq ofc) fat to undereye area. Supposedly buccal fat is more resistant to loss.
this isn't an issue that's unique to the under-eyes, the more dynamic an area is the lower the survival rate tends to be for fat grafts, and your eyes are extremely dynamic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eiei
this isn't an issue that's unique to the under-eyes, the more dynamic an area is the lower the survival rate tends to be for fat grafts, and your eyes are extremely dynamic.
i saw you mentioning that threads are only for areas that need little volume because they don't generate as much volume as fillers, but wouldn't it just be a matter of adding more of them? or is there a limit to how much volume you can add with them?

anw, thank you orc, you've been helping me a lot
 
i saw you mentioning that threads are only for areas that need little volume because they don't generate as much volume as fillers, but wouldn't it just be a matter of adding more of them? or is there a limit to how much volume you can add with them?

anw, thank you orc, you've been helping me a lot
you can add a decent amount of volume if you just continue dumping them in the same area, but it won't be comparable to fillers.

some people think I got surgery due to the little amount of volume I've build on my cheekbones.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eiei
you can add a decent amount of volume if you just continue dumping them in the same area, but it won't be comparable to fillers.
that's interesting
some people think I got surgery due to the little amount of volume I've build on my cheekbones.
you should take this as a compliment

only a few people had the idea of using PDO threads to reposition soft tissues instead of just lifting the skin, and even fewer have used them to specifically create volume
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orc
you can add a decent amount of volume if you just continue dumping them in the same area, but it won't be comparable to fillers.

some people think I got surgery due to the little amount of volume I've build on my cheekbones.
so , If you were to either do pdos in the folds or fat-dissolving injections which would you do first ?

Im do this but I want to know which I should do before the other to not cause any complications between the two. Also how many sessions of fat-dissloving did this take ?
 
so , If you were to either do pdos in the folds or fat-dissolving injections which would you do first ?

Im do this but I want to know which I should do before the other to not cause any complications between the two. Also how many sessions of fat-dissloving did this take ?
I did threads first, dissolver later, the threads aren't affected by it by the way.

it took 4 or 5 sessions, it's not easy to remove fat from your mid-face, you have to be careful and use low dosages like I did, it's possible to take too much.
 
  • +1
Reactions: future_
I did threads first, dissolver later, the threads aren't affected by it by the way.

it took 4 or 5 sessions, it's not easy to remove fat from your mid-face, you have to be careful and use low dosages like I did, it's possible to take too much.
alr, thank you. I am assuming its fine to use lipolab instead aswell, correct ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: MUSTYCOPER
How come that people like O'pry and Barrett have almost no nasolabial folds then? You think they did surgery or fillers? I think it has to be bone structure, maxilla, zygos + bimax. The only pic of O'pry where he has them a lil bit is under bad lighting and when he's oiled up.



Sddefault


but then again dudes like henry cavill, jensen ackles etc. started to develop them in their mid 20s already like me.

I also noticed that foids have visible more folds than men, which implies that it's because of more fat pads on cheeks and probably less bones.

edit:
also chico has less bones than o'pry and you see him with nasolabial folds under bad lighting and without too much editing/make up:
Image 6325235
 
Last edited:
Hey Orc! Really appreciate what u give to this forum. I have 100 threads in my face since I have read your threads.

Do u think lemonbottle is also working instead of aqualyx? I can get it way more easier than aqualyx.
 
  • +1
Reactions: future_
How come that people like O'pry and Barrett have almost no nasolabial folds then? You think they did surgery or fillers? I think it has to be bone structure, maxilla, zygos + bimax. The only pic of O'pry where he has them a lil bit is under bad lighting and when he's oiled up.



View attachment 3149168

but then again dudes like henry cavill, jensen ackles etc. started to develop them in their mid 20s already like me.

I also noticed that foids have visible more folds than men, which implies that it's because of more fat pads on cheeks and probably less bones.

edit:
also chico has less bones than o'pry and you see him with nasolabial folds under bad lighting and without too much editing/make up:
View attachment 3149177
o'pry doesn't have it due to the shape and position of his orbital vector, he has shit under-eyes because the bone starts very low which kind of prevents that area from denting in.

barrett doesn't have it because he's barely in his late twenties and probably had fillers for it (they were present when he was younger)

they are easy to hide with some light make-up, and are edited out of modeling shots.
Hey Orc! Really appreciate what u give to this forum. I have 100 threads in my face since I have read your threads.

Do u think lemonbottle is also working instead of aqualyx? I can get it way more easier than aqualyx.
lemonbottle is easier to get because it's shit.
 
Hey Orc! Really appreciate what u give to this forum. I have 100 threads in my face since I have read your threads.

Do u think lemonbottle is also working instead of aqualyx? I can get it way more easier than aqualyx.
Get kabelline. It's the korean copy that's a bit weaker (lower concentration) and can easily be ordered from korean websites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: germanmogger
i followed all your nasolabial guides

and it worked!
But I also add a Cog Thread in frontal cheekbones and this made a very big difference also.
 
yo so I did this and did just 6 on my left side and 5 on the right, but i didn't really bleed at all compared to the photo of you. Did i possibly not go deep enough?
 
yo so I did this and did just 6 on my left side and 5 on the right, but i didn't really bleed at all compared to the photo of you. Did i possibly not go deep enough?
nah it doesn't always bleed a whole lot that usually happens when you pull them out quickly.
 
Get kabelline. It's the korean copy that's a bit weaker (lower concentration) and can easily be ordered from korean websites.


here's a list of vendors.
 
nah it doesn't always bleed a whole lot that usually happens when you pull them out quickly.
bet , thx for this thread lwky i got around the same amount of fold u got so i hope for improvement. Im do screws soon to finish up soon. THX FR
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
3
Views
427
ronald_2
R
appealmaxed
Replies
138
Views
6K
wollet2
wollet2
NZb6Air
Replies
19
Views
655
Giorgio
Giorgio
garoupilled_
Replies
55
Views
2K
idkwhattoputhere
idkwhattoputhere

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top