Incitement to violence should be protected under freedom of speech.

D

Deleted member 20890

Banned
Joined
Jul 20, 2022
Posts
13,887
Reputation
16,382
If I don’t like someone, I should be allowed to publicly demonize someone and call on others to physically assault and possibly even kill them, and as long as I don’t carry out the violence, I should be legally in the clear.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TheDragon and Deleted member 19101
What if this was done to you? You would definitely be singing a different tune then. Do unto others as you wish them to do to you!
 
What if this was done to you? You would definitely be singing a different tune then. Do unto others as you wish them to do to you!
That doesn’t mean I’m wrong though.

If I was someone who raped 5 year olds then I wouldn’t want to be arrested. I would want to get off the hook. That wouldn’t mean I was right.
 
That doesn’t mean I’m wrong though.

If I was someone who raped 5 year olds then I wouldn’t want to be arrested. I would want to get off the hook. That wouldn’t mean I was right.
If what you say was brought into effect through the law or something, I could easily see it being abused by some random incel. Imagine being wrongfully accused of a crime that you did not commit, and someone has the verbal skills or charisma to incite others to kill you. There are levels to this, the constitution was created perfectly to protect your individual rights. The system is perfect, it's just humans who fuck it up too much.
 
If what you say was brought into effect through the law or something, I could easily see it being abused by some random incel. Imagine being wrongfully accused of a crime that you did not commit, and someone has the verbal skills or charisma to incite others to kill you. There are levels to this, the constitution was created perfectly to protect your individual rights. The system is perfect, it's just humans who fuck it up too much.
Nah this is stupid. You didn’t commit violence so you shouldn’t be held responsible for it.
 
Nah this is stupid. You didn’t commit violence so you shouldn’t be held responsible for it.
You wouldn't believe the kind of shit people will do to you when they are angry. They got little rules or loopholes they utilize to destroy you. It's kind of like playing a rigged game. When some random feker gets mad--especially a female--they turn to the law. And those guys are retarded as fuck, and just listen to whatever they say.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Primalsplit
i support euthanizing downies then the op wouldn't be around to make such stupid posts
 
If I don’t like someone, I should be allowed to publicly demonize someone and call on others to physically assault and possibly even kill them, and as long as I don’t carry out the violence, I should be legally in the clear.
It is protected, otherwise how do you think Muslim brotherhood is working in USA and Europe.
 
You wouldn't believe the kind of shit people will do to you when they are angry. They got little rules or loopholes they utilize to destroy you. It's kind of like playing a rigged game. When some random feker gets mad--especially a female--they turn to the law. And those guys are retarded as fuck, and just listen to whatever they say.
I don’t see your point. No violence = no penalties for violence
 
I don’t see your point. No violence = no penalties for violence
No penalties like jailtime, but if people think you did something. They will treat you like they would a common criminal. There is no such thing as acceptance in society.
 
No penalties like jailtime, but if people think you did something. They will treat you like they would a common criminal. There is no such thing as acceptance in society.
Social consequences are different than legal ones. I’m focused on legal ones.
 
Social consequences are different than legal ones. I’m focused on legal ones.
You may not be in jail, but to socially ostracized and hated by society is in itself a consequence worse than the legal variety. Think of the OJ Simpson trial (the first one). He was freed by the law, but hated by society. Which is worse? To be punished by randos who have never even heard of you, or be punished by the law (at least they have to feed you in jail).
 
You may not be in jail, but to socially ostracized and hated by society is in itself a consequence worse than the legal variety. Think of the OJ Simpson trial (the first one). He was freed by the law, but hated by society. Which is worse? To be punished by randos who have never even heard of you, or be punished by the law (at least they have to feed you in jail).
Social ostracism happens. That doesn’t mean it should me illegal.
 
freedom of speech is such a lie its funny they try to claim we have it in any form "muh u can say things against government officials muh muh'
 

Similar threads

coastal
Replies
58
Views
297
agustoz
agustoz
AbnormalAfrican
Replies
1
Views
17
molotov
molotov
resting
Replies
16
Views
128
scuderia
scuderia
Rick_bozo
Replies
32
Views
223
mortis
mortis
yyk117
Replies
6
Views
47
Crimx991
Crimx991

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top