Indo-Europeans/Aryans were not full whites. Only half whites.

D

Deleted member 40739

Silver
Joined
Aug 20, 2023
Posts
621
Reputation
525
They were 50% Caucasus hunters in dna. The other 50% was Eastern (European) hunters. So you could say they were only half whites.

They were pretty close to what modern non gook non Indic looking Afghans look like.

Something like this:

1000014861
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz, enchanted_elixir, TsarTsar444 and 1 other person
Ok so what about the EEF then? More specifically the Anatolian Neolithic farmer component
 
  • +1
Reactions: vermillioncorefan
No group today exist that is genetically similar to them..pheno is open to debate
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and enchanted_elixir
Ok so what about the EEF then? More specifically the Anatolian Neolithic farmer component
I havent researched that yet. But I think they lacked that. They were 50-50 Caucasus hunters-Eastern (European) hunters.

This is brutal news for nazicels. Indo Europeans/Aryans looked exactly like some modern day Afghanis which they dont deem white enough:

1000014861
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 23558 and enchanted_elixir
I havent researched that yet. But I think they lacked that. They were 50-50 Caucasus hunters-Eastern (European) hunters.

This is brutal news for nazicels. Aryans looked exactly like some modern day Afghanis which they dont deem white enough:

View attachment 2626741
No sane person claims Aryans were "white" Aryans predate the white race
 
  • +1
Reactions: MakinMogReturns, deadmanwalking, Deleted member 23558 and 3 others
They were 50% Caucasus hunters in dna. The other 50% was Eastern (European) hunters. So you could say they were only half whites.

They were pretty close to what modern non gook non Indic looking Afghans look like.

Something like this:

View attachment 2626728
White = nordic/germanic/scandinavian. Simple as that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 50891, deadmanwalking and 4 others
I havent researched that yet. But I think they lacked that. They were 50-50 Caucasus hunters-Eastern (European) hunters.

This is brutal news for nazicels. Indo Europeans/Aryans looked exactly like some modern day Afghanis which they dont deem white enough:

View attachment 2626741
The Yamnaya dna is highest amongst Scandinavians. Norway has highest Yamnaya affinity
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryan
White = nordic/germanic/scandinavian. Simple as that.
White=any person whos max DNA genetic makeup is a mix of yamnaya+western hunter gatherer+Anatolian farmers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and TsarTsar444
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558, Big White Cuck and ElTruecel
What a deranged thread, what makes EHG white somehow and CHG non white? Both had dark coloring with blue eyes and blonde hair being very rare
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and ElTruecel
White=any person whos max DNA genetic makeup is a mix of yamnaya+western hunter gatherer+Anatolian farmers
All europeans are white, only exception are Sardinians they lack steppe completely almost
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryan
They were 50% Caucasus hunters in dna. The other 50% was Eastern (European) hunters. So you could say they were only half whites.

They were pretty close to what modern non gook non Indic looking Afghans look like.

Something like this:

View attachment 2626728
6A6F4E1D DC54 40C0 BEE4 E0B543C7FC41
My aryan brother!!!
 
White=any person whos max DNA genetic makeup is a mix of yamnaya+western hunter gatherer+Anatolian farmers
White is a term invented by mutts. It is used to refer to the aforementioned groups. There's a reason why these posters exists.
Der Untermensch
1703345804825
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, Deleted member 23558 and TsarTsar444
Mugshotjase
Celt
1703345866790
Germanic
1703345934474
Med

All Indo-european ancestry but look drastically different
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall and Deleted member 23558
What a deranged thread, what makes EHG white somehow and CHG non white? Both had dark coloring with blue eyes and blonde hair being very rare
Caucasus is as close to Afghanistan as it is to Europe proper. Calling these hunters white is as much a stretch as calling Afghans white.

Ehg was probably very white looking considering they roamed the areas of some slav groups. But chg not so much.
 
Spaniards have the most EEF in Europe and so are most ethnic looking, thats why
Dawg modern Europeans are just a mix of ANF + WHG + Yamnaya. What makes ANF non white
 
Caucasus is as close to Afghanistan as it is to Europe proper. Calling these hunters white is as much a stretch as calling Afghans white.

Ehg was probably very white looking considering they roamed the areas of some slav groups. But chg not so much.
Non of them are white because such a thing didn't exist until after all the 3 parts which made up europeans came to be. EHG had south european like skin and mostly brown hair with brown eyes, some had blonde. CHG had also olive skin and brown hair with brown eyes but lacked blue eye and blonde hair genes completely

Caucasus is part of Europe itself but this is irrelevant, the white looking Afghans (Tajiks mostly) are a mix of Indo Europeans + Iranian Neolithic Farmer primary, they have very low WHG and EEF ancestry which makes them distinct somewhat in looking off in Europe but anyways non mixed Afghans are still arguably white
 
White along with Europe is a social construct. If we are actually being scientific and not using science to just confirm our bias then we have to accepts there are 1000s of biological "races".
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558 and incel194012940
yamnayas (aryans/indoeuropeans) weere the ones to bring the white skin into western europe. they were white, after mixing with native europeans (who were not white), their descendants (modern europeans) retained their white skin
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
They were 50% Caucasus hunters in dna. The other 50% was Eastern (European) hunters. So you could say they were only half whites.

They were pretty close to what modern non gook non Indic looking Afghans look like.

Something like this:

View attachment 2626728
this is so wrong :lul: blue eyes were already in europe before the indoeuropeans migrated here. in fact its believed that the modern blue eyes and blonde hair come from WHG and other preindoeuropeans and not from the yamnayas
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
yamnayas (aryans/indoeuropeans) weere the ones to bring the white skin into western europe. they were white, after mixing with native europeans (who were not white), their descendants (modern europeans) retained their white skin
No EEF farmers were the first to develop the genes for white skin, both them and Steppe people had the genes for white skin in them, only WHG lacked this and had dark curry tier skin but they are the ones who gave the gene for blue eyes the most
 
  • +1
Reactions: ElTruecel and Deleted member 43685
this is so wrong :lul: blue eyes were already in europe before the indoeuropeans migrated here. in fact its believed that the modern blue eyes and blonde hair come from WHG and other preindoeuropeans and not from the yamnayas
Blonde hair comes from Indo Europeans actually
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 43685
I havent researched that yet. But I think they lacked that. They were 50-50 Caucasus hunters-Eastern (European) hunters.

This is brutal news for nazicels. Indo Europeans/Aryans looked exactly like some modern day Afghanis which they dont deem white enough:

View attachment 2626741
Afghans are giga mixed with iranian farmers, gook, and south asian black hole no one look like indo europeans

The most white looking afghans like nuristanis and some afghans tajik are at best 40% indo european which is already very good considering normal pachto have 25-30%

Even the most indo european (lithuanians) are mixed at 50%
 
No EEF farmers were the first to develop the genes for white skin, both them and Steppe people had the genes for white skin in them, only WHG lacked this and had dark curry tier skin but they are the ones who gave the gene for blue eyes the most
didnt know that tbf, i always thought light coloring (hair+eyes) came from preindoeuropean populations
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
the photo op used is still wrong, yamnayas didnt look like that
They didnt because the photo example is a person which has zagros/iranic hunter gatherer dna which Proto IE's lacked ofcourse jfl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 43685
yamnayas (aryans/indoeuropeans) weere the ones to bring the white skin into western europe. they were white, after mixing with native europeans (who were not white), their descendants (modern europeans) retained their white skin
No. It was Middle Eastern farmers
 
didnt know that tbf, i always thought light coloring (hair+eyes) came from preindoeuropean populations
SmartSelect 20231223 180546 Gallery

This is a sardinian girl, they have the lowest steppe dna in Europe at 10% on average only which is nuts, and they still have this kind of skin on average without tanning. Steppe people had very similar skin tone to this women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 43685
Blonde hair comes from Indo Europeans actually
No. It comes from Ancient North Eurasians who predates Indo-Europeans by thousands of years
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
No. It comes from Ancient North Eurasians who predates Indo-Europeans by thousands of years
Well yes im talking about the ANE offspring which were the proto indo europeans
 
No group today exist that is genetically similar to them..pheno is open to debate
Nope. Icelandic, Irish & Danish people are genetically closest to them, and quite close at that.
 
Nope. Icelandic, Irish & Danish people are genetically closest to them, and quite close at that.ran
Technically Pamiris are as close to them as Nordics are. Both max out at 50% ancestry.

If you replaced the Iranian farmer ancestry in Pamiris with Western hunters, they would look pretty much the same as Scandinavians.

1000014883
1000014884


These people don't look 100% European because they have 50% Iranic farmer which was a mogger race but darker pigmented:

1000014882
 
Nope. Icelandic, Irish & Danish people are genetically closest to them, and quite close at that.
47% is not quite close. It's not even half.
 
Nope. Icelandic, Irish & Danish people are genetically closest to them, and quite close at that.
No, they are 50-55% on average
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ryan
  • +1
Reactions: St.TikTokcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top