Infraorbital implant vs Quad Lefort 1

AustrianMogger

AustrianMogger

LTN from Austria 𝕯𝖝𝕯 𝖈𝖗𝖊𝖜, #1 MGTOL
Joined
Oct 25, 2024
Posts
9,531
Reputation
8,567
What is better?
1758640117585

1758640137471
 
  • +1
Reactions: pajjeetslayer and Resistance.
du brauchst keine bimaxxxx
man so over.
Lass doch nen alten kauz träumen. Es is anscheinend so over das selbst chirurgen mich nicht behandel wollen.
Ropefuel
 
man so over.
Lass doch nen alten kauz träumen. Es is anscheinend so over das selbst chirurgen mich nicht behandel wollen.
Ropefuel
einfach implants für bessere und günstigere ergebnisse??
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AustrianMogger
einfach implants für bessere und günstigere ergebnisse??
Wenns irgendwie mit osteotomie geht ist immer besser. Hoffe irgendwann kann man eigenknochen implant machen aber bisdahin is es halt irgendwie over
 
einfach implants für bessere und günstigere ergebnisse??
Naja keiner macht doch implants is ja das problem.
Wenn Zemann mir nen titan implant reinschweißen würd würd ichs auch sofort machen aber alle cban ja nur
 
If your goal is to improve lower eye support and simultaneously move your maxilla forward, the Lefort 1 + Lower Eyelid R. will be sufficient.

However, if your goal is only lower eye support, the Lower Eyelid R. will suffice.


This is because Lefort 1 addresses forward facial growth and midface problems rather than the lower eyes. Lefort 2 and Lefort 3 generally address lower eye support directly, but this is quite expensive and unnecessary. Lefort 1 + lower eyelid r. is the most logical approach.
 
If your goal is to improve lower eye support and simultaneously move your maxilla forward, the Lefort 1 + Lower Eyelid R. will be sufficient.

However, if your goal is only lower eye support, the Lower Eyelid R. will suffice.


This is because Lefort 1 addresses forward facial growth and midface problems rather than the lower eyes. Lefort 2 and Lefort 3 generally address lower eye support directly, but this is quite expensive and unnecessary. Lefort 1 + lower eyelid r. is the most logical approach.
Lower eyelid retraction ?
How does it give support for eye area ?
Or are you saying that the support is already given with standard Lefort1, and you just do low eyelid R for extra cosmetic result on eye area ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Resistance.
Lower eyelid retraction ?
How does it give support for eye area ?
Or are you saying that the support is already given with standard Lefort1, and you just do low eyelid R for extra cosmetic result on eye area ?
Lefort 1 cannot directly address lower eyelid support. If you desire both lower eyelid support and a developed upper jaw, Lefort 1 + Lower Eyelid R. is a very logical choice. Lefort 2 and Lefort 3 can directly address lower eyelid support, but these are much more expensive and difficult procedures.
 
Lefort 1 cannot directly address lower eyelid support. If you desire both lower eyelid support and a developed upper jaw, Lefort 1 + Lower Eyelid R. is a very logical choice. Lefort 2 and Lefort 3 can directly address lower eyelid support, but these are much more expensive and difficult procedures.
what i don't get is how lower eyelid retraction is supposed to support eye area ?
this procedure soleley aims to pull the lower eyelid more up, giving less scleral show.
But that's it, no mass is injected/grafted/implanted to the infraorbital...

Why'd you do this over canthopexy ?
 

Similar threads

bobbyp343
Replies
64
Views
441
JohnDoe
J
william.
Replies
7
Views
224
william.
william.
C
Replies
0
Views
105
crabhi
C
J
Replies
24
Views
545
moze
M
J
Replies
3
Views
225
coolman985
coolman985

Users who are viewing this thread

  • pllxiao
Back
Top