INFRAS | INFRA-OBSESSED AUTISTS GTFIH

[jr49506]

Everyone sees dark inner undereyes and immediately concludes that the Infras are ‘recessed’

This doesn’t make sense to me, when you look at the side profiles of Chad’s or Chadlites:

If you laser focus on the infras, they have an orbital vector that angles slightly back toward the ear.

Of course these people don’t have the purple vascularity in the tear trough which amplifies the illusion of ‘recessed infras’

Im just saying that if looksmax niggas are expecting that this line pointing down is supposed to point forward:

I have yet to see a single person who doesn’t have the line below their eye pointing down or toward the ear.

CONCLUSION: niggas heavily overdiagnose ‘recessed’ infras and that tear trough line is not anatomically possible to slant forward like the nose does.

 

[jr49506]

WATER

 

[jr49506]

Dnr nigger

 

[Autistical]

Everyone sees dark inner undereyes and immediately concludes that the Infras are ‘recessed’

This doesn’t make sense to me, when you look at the side profiles of Chad’s or Chadlites:

View attachment 5429479View attachment 5429480View attachment 5429481View attachment 5429482


If you laser focus on the infras, they have an orbital vector that angles slightly back toward the ear.

Of course these people don’t have the purple vascularity in the tear trough which amplifies the illusion of ‘recessed infras’

Im just saying that if looksmax niggas are expecting that this line pointing down is supposed to point forward:

I have yet to see a single person who doesn’t have the line below their eye pointing down or toward the ear.

CONCLUSION: niggas heavily overdiagnose ‘recessed’ infras and that tear trough line is not anatomically possible to slant forward like the nose does.

View attachment 5429514View attachment 5429516View attachment 5429517View attachment 5429518

High IQ. it's rarely the infras being recessed too. and in the cases that they are, usually the whole orbital area and subsequentially the rest of the face follows along in the recession

 

[jr49506]

High IQ. it's rarely the infras being recessed too. and in the cases that they are, usually the whole orbital area and subsequentially the rest of the face follows along in the recession

Yes. The tear trough area will never look forward, what matters is that the eyes look supported.

 

[jr49506]

@Clavicular

 

[jr49506]

bump

 

[Goy.boy.Hero]

Everyone sees dark inner undereyes and immediately concludes that the Infras are ‘recessed’

This doesn’t make sense to me, when you look at the side profiles of Chad’s or Chadlites:

View attachment 5429479View attachment 5429480View attachment 5429481View attachment 5429482


If you laser focus on the infras, they have an orbital vector that angles slightly back toward the ear.

Of course these people don’t have the purple vascularity in the tear trough which amplifies the illusion of ‘recessed infras’

Im just saying that if looksmax niggas are expecting that this line pointing down is supposed to point forward:

I have yet to see a single person who doesn’t have the line below their eye pointing down or toward the ear.

CONCLUSION: niggas heavily overdiagnose ‘recessed’ infras and that tear trough line is not anatomically possible to slant forward like the nose does.

View attachment 5429514View attachment 5429516View attachment 5429517View attachment 5429518

Correct

 

[jr49506]

Correct

Please rep me

 

[jr49506]

Everyone sees dark inner undereyes and immediately concludes that the Infras are ‘recessed’

This doesn’t make sense to me, when you look at the side profiles of Chad’s or Chadlites:

View attachment 5429479View attachment 5429480View attachment 5429481View attachment 5429482


If you laser focus on the infras, they have an orbital vector that angles slightly back toward the ear.

Of course these people don’t have the purple vascularity in the tear trough which amplifies the illusion of ‘recessed infras’

Im just saying that if looksmax niggas are expecting that this line pointing down is supposed to point forward:

I have yet to see a single person who doesn’t have the line below their eye pointing down or toward the ear.

CONCLUSION: niggas heavily overdiagnose ‘recessed’ infras and that tear trough line is not anatomically possible to slant forward like the nose does.

View attachment 5429514View attachment 5429516View attachment 5429517View attachment 5429518

BTW ANYONE WHO ACTUALLY BELIVES THIS IS WATER IS RETARDED

‘Recessed Infras’ is one of the most popular flaws that looksmax autists spread.

The point of this is to explain that the inner undereye area: ‘infras’ being purple ≠ recession, rather the best way to tell if someone has recessed infras is:

the eye shape itself, if you have sclera show, or eyes that are too open vertically.

 

[idontmogYET]

@Clavicular

nigga tagged the forum israeli plant

 

[gasping]

Everyone sees dark inner undereyes and immediately concludes that the Infras are ‘recessed’

This doesn’t make sense to me, when you look at the side profiles of Chad’s or Chadlites:

View attachment 5429479View attachment 5429480View attachment 5429481View attachment 5429482


If you laser focus on the infras, they have an orbital vector that angles slightly back toward the ear.

Of course these people don’t have the purple vascularity in the tear trough which amplifies the illusion of ‘recessed infras’

Im just saying that if looksmax niggas are expecting that this line pointing down is supposed to point forward:

I have yet to see a single person who doesn’t have the line below their eye pointing down or toward the ear.

CONCLUSION: niggas heavily overdiagnose ‘recessed’ infras and that tear trough line is not anatomically possible to slant forward like the nose does.

View attachment 5429514View attachment 5429516View attachment 5429517View attachment 5429518

Peep mine

 

[jr49506]

Peep mine

Peep ur thread? Or your infras?

 

[gasping]

Peep ur thread? Or your infras?

What’s ur discord

 

[jr49506]

What’s ur discord

Jr49506