Injecting GHK-Cu for better facial skin is probably a waste of your time & money

[fiesta]

Injecting GHK-Cu for better facial skin might be total cope....... Lets talk about it

The most talked about human studies showing smoother skin, fewer wrinkles, and thicker skin were done using creams. Not from injecting it.

So when studies say GHK-CU can improve your skin.... they’re talking about topical use.

I think pinning it got hyped because people assume a needle must be stronger. It feels more serious. More extreme. Like it has to work better somehow.

But there aren’t large human cosmetic studies showing GHK-Cu used that way improves facial skin the way topical creams have been shown to. If anything most data points to effectively injecting GHK-Cu being pretty difficult to do :

• Once GHK-Cu is dissolved in water, stability becomes time and pH dependent.
• Major lab suppliers recommend not storing these aqueous solutions long term.
• Copper complexes are sensitive to:
  • pH
  • oxidation
  • light
  • temperature

And lets be honest most retards wont do the research to know what precautions to take to keep this peptide stable.

I'm not trying to prove that injecting GHK-Cu is totally ineffective, my point is that just assuming something is effective is cope. I don't want to follow something blindly, I want to follow data. And it seems like the data for facial skin improvement isn't there with injecting this peptide.

TDLR​

GHK-Cu is biologically active in skin cells.

Topical delivery places it directly where those cells live.

Systemic delivery adds unnecessary complexity if the goal is improving facial skin.

If anyone has data that proves injecting GHK-Cu systemically is better for facial skin than topical use, please share it and lets discuss.

 

[peacefulgreycell]

both cope

 

[aztecas]

high IQ. Tretinoin mogs

 

[dxelt]

Injecting GHK-Cu for better facial skin might be total cope....... Lets talk about it

The most talked about human studies showing smoother skin, fewer wrinkles, and thicker skin were done using creams. Not from injecting it.

So when studies say GHK-CU can improve your skin.... they’re talking about topical use.

I think pinning it got hyped because people assume a needle must be stronger. It feels more serious. More extreme. Like it has to work better somehow.

But there aren’t large human cosmetic studies showing GHK-Cu used that way improves facial skin the way topical creams have been shown to. If anything most data points to effectively injecting GHK-Cu being pretty difficult to do :

• Once GHK-Cu is dissolved in water, stability becomes time and pH dependent.
• Major lab suppliers recommend not storing these aqueous solutions long term.
• Copper complexes are sensitive to:
  • pH
  • oxidation
  • light
  • temperature

And lets be honest most retards wont do the research to know what precautions to take to keep this peptide stable.

I'm not trying to prove that injecting GHK-Cu is totally ineffective, my point is that just assuming something is effective is cope. I don't want to follow something blindly, I want to follow data. And it seems like the data for facial skin improvement isn't there with injecting this peptide.

TDLR​

GHK-Cu is biologically active in skin cells.

Topical delivery places it directly where those cells live.

Systemic delivery adds unnecessary complexity if the goal is improving facial skin.

If anyone has data that proves injecting GHK-Cu systemically is better for facial skin than topical use, please share it and lets discuss.

it literally made my skin so much better (injected) im not sure why so many people claim cope

 

[YIBUTI_]

injected is cope and topical is cope too, people just wasting money atp

 

[Notzaiddy]

it literally made my skin so much better (injected) im not sure why so many people claim cope

how many mg are you on

 

[negativ_canthalshit]

Injecting GHK-Cu for better facial skin might be total cope....... Lets talk about it

The most talked about human studies showing smoother skin, fewer wrinkles, and thicker skin were done using creams. Not from injecting it.

So when studies say GHK-CU can improve your skin.... they’re talking about topical use.

I think pinning it got hyped because people assume a needle must be stronger. It feels more serious. More extreme. Like it has to work better somehow.

But there aren’t large human cosmetic studies showing GHK-Cu used that way improves facial skin the way topical creams have been shown to. If anything most data points to effectively injecting GHK-Cu being pretty difficult to do :

• Once GHK-Cu is dissolved in water, stability becomes time and pH dependent.
• Major lab suppliers recommend not storing these aqueous solutions long term.
• Copper complexes are sensitive to:
  • pH
  • oxidation
  • light
  • temperature

And lets be honest most retards wont do the research to know what precautions to take to keep this peptide stable.

I'm not trying to prove that injecting GHK-Cu is totally ineffective, my point is that just assuming something is effective is cope. I don't want to follow something blindly, I want to follow data. And it seems like the data for facial skin improvement isn't there with injecting this peptide.

TDLR​

GHK-Cu is biologically active in skin cells.

Topical delivery places it directly where those cells live.

Systemic delivery adds unnecessary complexity if the goal is improving facial skin.

If anyone has data that proves injecting GHK-Cu systemically is better for facial skin than topical use, please share it and lets discuss.

Mirin, oh wow

 

[fiesta]

injected is cope and topical is cope too, people just wasting money atp

Using topical GHK-CU has been proven to show improvements in facial skin in multiple studies bro go read

 

[tastas]

dermastamp + high % topical ghk is better
gives faster and more localized results for the face

 

[fiesta]

dermastamp + high % topical ghk is better
gives faster and more localized results for the face

wow finally someone with a brain this guy knows what's up