NarrowBoneMarrow
Luminary
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2024
- Posts
- 7,650
- Reputation
- 11,049
Imagine instead of choosing partners based on looks everyone did it based on IQ 50 years ago
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Inverselyiq and looks r related
not the case for eveyoneInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
howInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
There are many other factors correlating to iq such as more testosterone exposure in the womb this is why men are typically smarter than womanImagine instead of choosing partners based on looks everyone did it based on IQ 50 years ago
and wheres the correlation between those twoInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
explain niggaInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
Inversely
The uglier the Higher iq
Literally made a thread on this hour agoexplain nigga
well this is just wrongInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
Stop pointing to anomalies and acting like it's the rulewell this is just wrong
![]()
ur calling this nigga dumb?
he has an iq of 160
went to MIT
and got like 2 STEM related degress i think
or ur just calling him ugly which is objectivley wrong
Hes an exception not the rule. Just look at the highest iq people itw.well this is just wrong
![]()
ur calling this nigga dumb?
he has an iq of 160
went to MIT
and got like 2 STEM related degress i think
or ur just calling him ugly which is objectivley wrong
iq and looks r related
Not causation but correlation, ugly people study more.Inversely
The uglier the Higher iq
lmfao i did go to a stem department at a uni and it was mostly mtns with like a few htns+ sprinkled in thereStop pointing to anomalies and acting like it's the rule
Walk into any STEM department at a T1 university, it's all subhumans with high iqs
nikola tesla wasnt uglyHes an exception not the rule. Just look at the highest iq people itw.
How does this prove your point?lmfao i did go to a stem department at a uni and it was mostly mtns with like a few htns+ sprinkled in there
it was like majoirty mtn
then ltns
then htn+
im not kidding btw
so no im still right
cuz it isnt all subhumansHow does this prove your point?
No bro it's all about equal access to educationImagine instead of choosing partners based on looks everyone did it based on IQ 50 years ago
Models are dumb peoplecuz it isnt all subhumans
IQ has nothing to do with studying![]()
Not causation but correlation, ugly people study more.![]()
Dumb people never try to learn new things.IQ has nothing to do with studying
Absolutely notInversely
The uglier the Higher iq
Wasnt a chad either was he? Mtn at best and look at the rate of subhumans on the list compared to solid looking onesnikola tesla wasnt ugly
never said he was a chad legit in my head i was ratng him as a mtn but he isnt subhumanWasnt a chad either was he? Mtn at best and look at the rate of subhumans on the list compared to solid looking ones
i mean yeah cuz there brain dread oogly boogly cuz looks made their whole life but alot r smartModels are dumb people
You dont have to learn anything to get a high number on a iq testDumb people never try to learn new things.
So how are you supposed to answer the test? The test is not a personality exam.You dont have to learn anything to get a high number on a iq test
To some extent. Chinese have highest iq but not best looking buttttiq and looks r related
It legit is tho. Its mostly logic and pattern recognition.So how are you supposed to answer the test? The test is not a personality exam.