Iranians pass better in Pakistan than Turkey

Bengalis aren't Dravidians. We are indonaryans with some gook admixture sir :Comfy:

But you're kinda right we are low SMV - got short end of stick. Just like turkey btw I think average girl mogs average guy objectively because short height and gooky genes is less brutal for women.
Yeah Turks and Bengalis both have 15% Asian mix
 
Bengalis aren't Dravidians. We are indonaryans with some gook admixture sir :Comfy:

But you're kinda right we are low SMV - got short end of stick. Just like turkey btw I think average girl mogs average guy objectively because short height and gooky genes is less brutal for women.
Bengaljeets would be Dravidian genetically if it weren’t for the Tibetan admixture. You should thank those Tibetan ancestors from saving you.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: decadouche57
Bengaljeets would be Dravidian genetically if it weren’t for the Tibetan admixture. You should thank those Tibetan ancestors from saving you.
They have stepped and Zagros too
 
Bengaljeets would be Dravidian genetically if it weren’t for the Tibetan admixture. You should thank those Tibetan ancestors from saving you.
what the fuck is a Dravidian i keep seeing that word everywhere
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Gengar
what the fuck is a Dravidian i keep seeing that word everywhere
Dravidians are a linguistic group living in South Asia. Most live in southern India, but there is some living in southwestern Pakistan, too. However, genetically they are drastically different. Based on this, they believe in the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis, which says that Dravidian languages originated in modern-day Iran and spread to southern India.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Orka
Bengaljeets would be Dravidian genetically if it weren’t for the Tibetan admixture. You should thank those Tibetan ancestors from saving you.
Bengalis are neither genetically or linguistically Dravidian. You've said this before on some occasions but I couldn't be bothered to reply. Has nothing to do with gook admixture.
 
  • +1
Reactions: decadouche57
Dravidians are a linguistic group living in South Asia. Most live in southern India, but there is some living in southwestern Pakistan, too. However, genetically they are drastically different. Based on this, they believe in the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis, which says that Dravidian languages originated in modern-day Iran and spread to southern India.
whats the significance of them then? they're being brought up so much

sounds interesting though
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
thank you but that doesn't particularly clear up my confusion
Dravidian basically means people speaking the Dravidian languages from South India but these days it is used for pretty much any dark skinned Indian regardless of what language they speak or how they look
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Orka
Bengalis are neither genetically or linguistically Dravidian. You've said this before on some occasions but I couldn't be bothered to reply. Has nothing to do with gook admixture.
It has everything to do with East Asian admixture. I’ll show you a picture soon, when I get on PC to illustrate my point.

And yes Bengalis are linguistically Indo-Aryan.
 
what the fuck is a Dravidian i keep seeing that word everywhere
This
1762654554625


HArely anyone in Bangladesh looks like this even the quite dark ones. If they do it's a sub-1% minority in the Hindujeet areas of West of Bangladesh.

You look eastern Turk or Kurd
I don't. Fr. My facial.features is 100% curry. My colouring is light brown with yellow undertones not red. All south Asians know I'm curry. Curry recognises curry.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Orka
whats the significance of them then? they're being brought up so much

sounds interesting though
They seem to be more attractive to western foids; while they have dark skin (seen as a failo), they have good bones to back it up, and some have good height too. Compared to Indo-Aryans, who have usually no bones but better coloring. Although foids clearly do not care about coloring, that’s why Indo-Aryans despite being lighter have no SMV.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
It has everything to do with East Asian admixture. I’ll show you a picture soon, when I get on PC to illustrate my point.
The east Asian genetics is as irrelevant as sub-saharan genetics in southern Moroccans, or central Asian genetics in eastern Turks. It just doesn't show up enough to make us look different unless they are an outlier.

It's just a passing reference I wouldn't even take it seriously. It has the slightest affect and usually on a minority. Usually people from Chittagong it's more prevalent.
And yes Bengalis are linguistically Indo-Aryan.
Genetically too...
 
The east Asian genetics is as irrelevant as sub-saharan genetics in southern Moroccans, or central Asian genetics in eastern Turks. It just doesn't show up enough to make us look different unless they are an outlier.

It's just a passing reference I wouldn't even take it seriously. It has the slightest affect and usually on a minority.
Not genetically. The East Asian admixture is significant, believe it or not. It’s what pulls you away from Indian Dravidians and also Sri Lankans. I’ll get on my PC in a bit. Anyway, you can also see the EA admixture reflected in your beard genetics. A lot of Bengalis cannot grow proper beards because of this admixture I think.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SplashJuice and SecularIslamist
Yeah Turks and Bengalis both have 15% Asian mix
Does that mean I'm entitled to a Turkish QT? :aheago:

Maybe the Kanglu memes were right after all :feelskek:
They’re both East Asian admixture but different kind of East Asian. Turks get it from East Asian and Central Asian Turkic populations, whereas Bengalis get is from Tibetan populations.
 
  • +1
Reactions: decadouche57
There's a lot of Iranians living in Pakistan. Why?
There are barely any Iranians living in Pakistan. We used to have a lot of Afghans living here though but due to terror attacks from Afghan soil, the Pakistan establishment decided enough is enough, send all the Afghan refugees back. Why? Because the terrorists operating on Afghan soil would enter Pakistan while disguising as refugees.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin
They’re both East Asian admixture but different kind of East Asian. Turks get it from East Asian and Central Asian Turkic populations, whereas Bengalis get is from Tibetan populations.
We have East Asian?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
thank you but that doesn't particularly clear up my confusion
They're talking about darker skin indians like this

1762655328655

They seem to be more attractive to western foids;
not really, both lightskin and darkskin Indians have the same smv to western foids ngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
We have East Asian?
Yes or Central Asian, but it’s not a lot. As you know Turks originated in East Asia, passed through Central Asia and then settled in Turkey. You are still genetically Anatolian. I’m going to look for some DNA results as well in a bit. A lot of Turks have uploaded their DNA online.
 
  • +1
Reactions: decadouche57
They're talking about darker skin indians like this

View attachment 4304458

not really, both lightskin and darkskin Indians have the same smv to western foids ngl
I disagree. I had a Balkan/Slavic foid friend: she said she specifically was into Dravidians. She didn’t like North Indians.
 
Not genetically. The East Asian admixture is significant, believe it or not. It’s what pulls you away from Indian Dravidians and also Sri Lankans. I’ll get on my PC in a bit. Anyway, you can also see the EA admixture reflected in your beard genetics. A lot of Bengalis cannot grow proper beards because of this admixture I think.
EVen without EA admixture. Bengalis are pretty much homegenous. They are distinct from both Northern and southern Indians. The EA is more prevelent in Sylethi and Chittagong - where I'm from originally but it just doesn't feature in any significant way.

Idk about beard hypothesis. I agree east Asians struggle but idk about Bengalis in particular.

They’re both East Asian admixture but different kind of East Asian. Turks get it from East Asian and Central Asian Turkic populations, whereas Bengalis get is from Tibetan populations.
Yeah well central Asia is at crossroads. But anyway if I have gook appeal I will leverage it as much as possible :Comfy:
 
EVen without EA admixture. Bengalis are pretty much homegenous. They are distinct from both Northern and southern Indians. The EA is more prevelent in Sylethi and Chittagong - where I'm from originally but it just doesn't feature in any significant way.

Idk about beard hypothesis. I agree east Asians struggle but idk about Bengalis in particular.
Yes you guys are distinct from Indians but only because of the East Asian admixture that’s not found in other South Asian populations. It’s pretty significant. But we are going in circles so give me a few mins and I’ll show you.
Yeah well central Asia is at crossroads. But anyway if I have gook appeal I will leverage it as much as possible :Comfy:
Just say “abla our ancestor are from sem place, Asia. Pls marry me abla.” Would this work, @decadouche57?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: decadouche57 and SecularIslamist
I disagree. I had a Balkan/Slavic foid friend: she said she specifically was into Dravidians. She didn’t like North Indians.
Fair, im just talking about american foids, they don't fw Indians at all tho i suppose its easier for dravidians to bbcmaxx and shit, but even then theyre stuck in a nieche when they do that
 
  • +1
Reactions: SplashJuice
Fair, im just talking about american foids, they don't fw Indians at all tho i suppose its easier for dravidians to bbcmaxx and shit, but even then theyre stuck in a nieche when they do that
Oh ok, idk about American foids ngl. This one was straight from the Balkans, but moved to the UK.
 
There are barely any Iranians living in Pakistan. We used to have a lot of Afghans living here though but due to terror attacks from Afghan soil, the Pakistan establishment decided enough is enough, send all the Afghan refugees back. Why? Because the terrorists operating on Afghan soil would enter Pakistan while disguising as refugees.
Always the case with humanitarian shit. The wolves look at anything as an opportunity and it ruins everything for people who are actually needful.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
Always the case with humanitarian shit. The wolves look at anything as an opportunity and it ruins everything for people who are actually needful.
That’s right. Collective punishment is not the way to go but sadly it happens.
 
That’s right. Collective punishment is not the way to go but sadly it happens.
Well, you cannot extend aid at such a great expense to yourself. At some point you gotta make the ultimate decision of someone else's kids dying or your own kids dying. And I wouldn't call it punishment, but just a harsh unfortunately necessity.

Like, if I were in charge of defending my citizens and enemy terrorists were continuously attacking us from a school then every child at that school would sadly have to die just to potentially save a handful of my own citizens. That is war.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • truebonesmasher210
  • Gengar
  • NotAMogger
Back
Top