Elaborate
This depends. Guy with 0.9 ratio can look more compact than guy with 1.0+ ratio.
.9 is awfully low tho
Then why does Ian look so godly, can you explain?
hair ,skin, leanliness carries him so hard with eye area
Higher the better
Measured wrong
not only about hair and skin
But this doesn't make much sense to me. How long your midface is is relative to your skull size, if your skull is small then something like 62-65 would look same with 65-68 on someone that has a larger skull
No it wouldnt.
Doesn't make sense, if someones proportions are bigger, like taller skull 24cm, 15cm byzigomatic, taller thirds, then he's midface will naturally be inline with his other proportions and be longer opposed to someone that has 22cm skull, 13.7cm byzigomatic, and his thirda are also smaller so he will end up with a 63mm mid face
But still your features (eyes and lips) are more away from themselves and it looks worse.
My theory is that that is relative to your es ratio and lower third height, lucky blue's mid third is the longest out of his third thats why it has a horse face look, if he had a broader and taller lower third and smaller es ratio then he would look compact
jordan barrett has a fwhr of like 2.3-2.4 and he's easily one of the top 5 goodlooking models (with everyone in prime)
His fwhr is 1.98
2 fwhr is still within the ideal range
