Is 1.82 fwhr ideal?

I’d have to disagree, if you look at actors/models most have lower fwhr with high angularity, like one of the only exceptions is jb.
Yeah, most of them fall on the lower side of the ideal, but they are still usually above or just around 1.9.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mltn2mtn
Yeah, most of them fall on the lower side of the ideal, but they are still usually above or just around 1.9.
Yeah but 1.82 can’t be that brutal right? Most of them are like 1.92-1.95.
 
1.86 is ideal contrary to the 2.X copers
 
  • +1
Reactions: zirving and mltn2mtn
1782929006309
 
  • +1
Reactions: mltn2mtn

Similar threads

xye
Replies
7
Views
70
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
K
Replies
2
Views
54
Kaperoo
K
ascendent
Replies
10
Views
34
polarpop
polarpop
copecell118
Replies
3
Views
65
copecell118
copecell118
A
Replies
6
Views
69
PSLgodBlackPerson
PSLgodBlackPerson

Users who are viewing this thread

  • chudstagram
  • Sulfuras
  • mltn2mtn
  • zirving
  • Pale God
  • Delete_user
  • czechpsl
  • NDMTNcel
  • duduboy
  • ntlarper420
Back
Top