Is a small rib cage a death sentence?

Lmao what a bitch. Of course you will... yet you’re too much of a pussy to post yours. I wonder why.

I measured myself to be 18 inches wide. One google search tells me the average is 16, but probably just like with height stats you need to add an extra 2 inches, making me exactly average, with a below average rib cage.

Now go ahead and post yours or you,”” just seem like an insecure barker. Wouldn’t want that.
ok lol

1585688125200
1585688130277


muhh "average"
mogged tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, Chadelite and didntreadlol
thanks for proving my point for me. all the guys i posted have small ribcages but have insane v tapers due to their big clavicles, therefore proving that clavicles are more important than ribcage for ratios.

View attachment 330969


you are too autistic to understand hyperbole apparently. when i say it's all about shoulders i don't mean that's all that matters, i mean it's the most important. and i never once said ratios don't matter, just that shoulders are the main thing that affects the ratio which i posted several examples of

no one has the fucking bone structure to have a waist as wide as a pair of wide shoulders. if a guy has wide shoulders and his waist is just as big that's because he has high body fat.

you don't have a better v taper than this guy. post pics or it's just e stats.

They have insane V tapers due to their shoudlers and WAIST not just just because of big shoulders you fucking retard.

Shoulders is not most important, its literally on par with waist.

"no one has the fucking bone structure to have a waist as wide as a pair of wide shoulders. if a guy has wide shoulders and his waist is just as big that's because he has high body fat." Exactly, so RATIOS once again.

Also ribcage still matter because they still would look better with a slightly bigger ribcage. RATIOS.

1585688240681


Thank you for proving me correct with this pic. He's 50 years old and his frame still look good because of ribcage to waist ratio while having "smaller" clavicle. You fucking reject.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and 1 other person

Is that really you? Sorry boyo but I don’t think you’ll be Chico any time soon lmao. Maybe the first half of my avi.

You do have better proportions than me but I wouldn’t be so sure if you’re wider. Only way is to measure yourself I guess which I don’t assume you’ll do. Also my arms are way thicker.
Anyway props to you for actually posting it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
body is cope tbh, just be big body wise, and the rest is height and face.
Sad shit that due to thot mentality now huge D is a thing and a necessity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
They have insane V tapers due to their shoudlers and WAIST not just just because of big shoulders you fucking retard.
once again being too autistic to understand hyperbole. you think because i say shoulders matter most means i think waist doesn't matter at all. what i say is true, because anyone can get a decently small waist even if their bone structure in that area is wider. by your logic this guy shouldn't have good ratios because he has a wide waist bone structure, yet he does:
Shoulder model

"no one has the fucking bone structure to have a waist as wide as a pair of wide shoulders. if a guy has wide shoulders and his waist is just as big that's because he has high body fat." Exactly, so RATIOS once again.
that doesn't fucking matter because body fat is not genetic like bone structure. if the hypothetical guy with big shoulders and a big waist loses body fat he will have good ratios you idiot.
View attachment 331009

Thank you for proving me correct with this pic. He's 50 years old and his frame still look good because of ribcage to waist ratio while having "smaller" clavicle. You fucking reject.
he looks like utter shit. the guy is built like a dopey cartoon character and not in a good way. and if you're really so deluded as to think his ratios are good, his shoulder to waist ratio is still objectively lower than all the other guys i posted, therefore clavicles are more important. the guys i posted with wide clavicle and small ribcage all have extreme v tapers and he doesn't.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
Is that really you? Sorry boyo but I don’t think you’ll be Chico any time soon lmao. Maybe the first half of my avi.

You do have better proportions than me but I wouldn’t be so sure if you’re wider. Only way is to measure yourself I guess which I don’t assume you’ll do. Also my arms are way thicker.
Anyway props to you for actually posting it.
lol im not indian bro im black
also its not about the measurements its about the ratios, im shorter than you so if i was your height i would measure wider, not like that matters anyway
also cope your arms arent thicker, youre just as much of a twig as me lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401, didntreadlol and Deleted member 3795
lol im not indian bro im black
also its not about the measurements its about the ratios, im shorter than you so if i was your height i would measure wider, not like that matters anyway
also cope your arms arent thicker, youre just as much of a twig as me lol

Ratios are more important but when you’re wearing a shirt then it’s better to have wider shoulders than anything else. David Laid wearing a shirt doesn’t look as impressive as he should.

A black dude worshiping white TikTok twinks? That’s a first. Are you of west African descent?

And yes, you can see from a mile away my arms are way thicker.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
once again being too autistic to understand hyperbole. you think because i say shoulders matter most means i think waist doesn't matter at all. what i say is true, because anyone can get a decently small waist even if their bone structure in that area is wider. by your logic this guy shouldn't have good ratios because he has a wide waist bone structure, yet he does:
View attachment 331024

that doesn't fucking matter because body fat is not genetic like bone structure. if the hypothetical guy with big shoulders and a big waist loses body fat he will have good ratios you idiot.

he looks like utter shit. the guy is built like a dopey cartoon character and not in a good way. and if you're really so deluded as to think his ratios are good, his shoulder to waist ratio is still objectively lower than all the other guys i posted, therefore clavicles are more important. the guys i posted with wide clavicle and small ribcage all have extreme v tapers and he doesn't.

1585688911334


He doesn't have a wide waist, do you even know where the waist is you retard?

"that doesn't fucking matter because body fat is not genetic like bone structure. if the hypothetical guy with big shoulders and a big waist loses body fat he will have good ratios you idiot." Yes but because he is fat he has a shit ratio and will still look like shit even if he has big shoudlers. I'm not arguing that you cant change your body fat.

1585689195657


And you're fucking stupid to think he doesn't look good for a 50 year old.

Just because shoulder to waist ratio is more important, it doesn't exclude the fact that ribcage to waist ratio is also important.

its like me saying "just have a good skull, hair is not important".
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and 1 other person
Ratios are more important but when you’re wearing a shirt then it’s better to have wider shoulders than anything else. David Laid wearing a shirt doesn’t look as impressive as he should.

A black dude worshiping white TikTok twinks? That’s a first. Are you of west African descent?

And yes, you can see from a mile away my arms are way thicker.
i dont get what u mean by the first part i think youre just coping

also no im not west african, im east african and have a caucasian skull so im chicomaxxing

your arms arent really thicker lol, ive never done a single pushup in my life so not like i care (FACE), have the genes for bodybuilding so i could gymcel if i wanted tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
View attachment 331037

He doesn't have a wide waist, do you even know where the waist is you retard?
I said wide waist BONE structure. learn to read. look at his hip bones.
"that doesn't fucking matter because body fat is not genetic like bone structure. if the hypothetical guy with big shoulders and a big waist loses body fat he will have good ratios you idiot." Yes but because he is fat he has a shit ratio and will still look like shit even if he has big shoudlers. I'm not arguing that you cant change your body fat.
but your entire autistic rant started with the fact that somehow the clavicle isn't more important than the ribcage for ratios, these are both GENETIC traits therefore it's irrelevant what a completely non genetic factor does to your ratios becauase it's completely preventable. you can't grow a longer pair of clavicles or a wider ribcage
View attachment 331047

And you're fucking stupid to think he doesn't look good for a 50 year old.
looking good for a 50 year old doesn't mean he doesn't look like shit. the average 50 year old looks like horseshit, he looks like better shit. a pile of shit with sprinkles on it is still a pile of shit. your argument is that having big clavicles isn't more important than having a big ribcage, and when i post pics proving you wrong you have to backpeddle saying he looks good "for a 50 year old" because you know he looks like shit compared to people with a better bone structure
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
I said wide waist BONE structure. learn to read. look at his hip bones.

but your entire autistic rant started with the fact that somehow the clavicle isn't more important than the ribcage for ratios, these are both GENETIC traits therefore it's irrelevant what a completely non genetic factor does to your ratios becauase it's completely preventable. you can't grow a longer pair of clavicles or a wider ribcage

looking good for a 50 year old doesn't mean he doesn't look like shit. the average 50 year old looks like horseshit, he looks like better shit. a pile of shit with sprinkles on it is still a pile of shit. your argument is that having big clavicles isn't more important than having a big ribcage, and when i post pics proving you wrong you have to backpeddle saying he looks good "for a 50 year old" because you know he looks like shit compared to people with a better bone structure

"I said wide waist BONE structure. learn to read. look at his hip bones."

giphy.gif


When the fuck did I say that clavicle isn't more important than ribcage for ratios, quote me you stupid schizophrenic fuck.

I said that ratios matter more than just big shoulders in itself.

giphy.gif


Can't believe I'm actually arguing with a schizophrenic retard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horizontallytall, AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and 1 other person
"I said wide waist BONE structure. learn to read. look at his hip bones."

giphy.gif
the hip bones are the bone that affects width of the waist you retard. there's no such thing as a "waist bone", there's a ribcage then a pair of hips.
1200px-Human_skeleton_front_arrows_no_labels.svg.png


When the fuck did I say that clavicle isn't more important than ribcage for ratios, quote me you stupid schizophrenic fuck.
you never explicitly stated that, but you obviously implied it when i clearly stated that i simply meant clavicles are the most important thing for ratios and posted several pictures proving that point and you still are too retarded to get the point. posting le funny memes mocking me doesn't make you right, just proves you're too much of a retard to make a real argument.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
the hip bones are the bone that affects width of the waist you retard. there's no such thing as a "waist bone", there's a ribcage then a pair of hips.
1200px-Human_skeleton_front_arrows_no_labels.svg.png



you never explicitly stated that, but you obviously implied it when i clearly stated that i simply meant clavicles are the most important thing for ratios and posted several pictures proving that point and you still are too retarded to get the point. posting le funny memes mocking me doesn't make you right, just proves you're too much of a retard to make a real argument.

I'm not saying that the waist is a bone you fucking retard.

I already made the real argument, you're just a fucking lost cause beyond help so all I can do is laugh at you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
I'm not saying that the waist is a bone you fucking retard.

I already made the real argument, you're just a fucking lost cause beyond help so all I can do is laugh at you.
you implied it. i said the waist is affected by hip bone structure, you mocked me for it, i posted a picture of human anatomy proving you wrong and now you're back peddling again. why the fuck do lean people have massively different waist sizes at the same body fat and muscle mass? because of fucking bones, and the hip bones are ones that occupy that area of the body. you can't do anything except chimpout because your iq is too low to make a real argument. "all i can do is laugh at you" as if i didn't post like 10 pics proving you wrong while all you do is act like a retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
you implied it. i said the waist is affected by hip bone structure, you mocked me for it, i posted a picture of human anatomy proving you wrong and now you're back peddling again. why the fuck do lean people have massively different waist sizes at the same body fat and muscle mass? because of fucking bones, and the hip bones are ones that occupy that area of the body. you can't do anything except chimpout because your iq is too low to make a real argument. "all i can do is laugh at you" as if i didn't post like 10 pics proving you wrong while all you do is act like a retard

When did I imply it? your schizophrenia is kicking in again buddy.

"i posted a picture of human anatomy proving you wrong and now you're back peddling again. why the fuck do lean people have massively different waist sizes at the same body fat and muscle mass? because of fucking bones, and the hip bones are ones that occupy that area of the body." - so now you're arguing for waist sizes, are you implying that the waist is just as important as shoulders? if so, we both agree that ratios are more important than big shoulders in itself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
When did I imply it? your schizophrenia is kicking in again buddy.
gaslighting again because you have no argument. i started out posting in this thread saying clavicles are most important, you made the argument that ratios matter more, after which i made it clear that clavicles are everything because they are precisely what gives you good ratios even if you have a bad ribcage or waist structure which i posted several examples of.
"i posted a picture of human anatomy proving you wrong and now you're back peddling again. why the fuck do lean people have massively different waist sizes at the same body fat and muscle mass? because of fucking bones, and the hip bones are ones that occupy that area of the body." - so now you're arguing for waist sizes, are you implying that the waist is just as important as shoulders? if so, we both agree that ratios are more important than big shoulders in itself.

no, my argument there was a rebuttal to the fact that you mocked me for saying waist genetics are caused by hip bones, which i posted anatomical proof of, then you just backpeddled on it when you realized you were wrong.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
gaslighting again because you have no argument. i started out posting in this thread saying clavicles are most important, you made the argument that ratios matter more, after which i made it clear that clavicles are everything because they are precisely what gives you good ratios even if you have a bad ribcage or waist structure which i posted several examples of.


no, my argument there was a rebuttal to the fact that you mocked me for saying waist genetics are caused by hip bones, which i posted anatomical proof of, then you just backpeddled on it when you realized you were wrong.

Clavicles are not everything, overall ratios are. End of.

And I will continue to mock you for being a schizophrenic retard making things up in your head thinking I typed them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
Clavicles are not everything, overall ratios are. End of.

And I will continue to mock you for being a schizophrenic retard making things up in your head thinking I typed them.
and clavicles are everything when it comes to determining your ratios. i have posted endless pics proving that with a shit ribcage or wide hips, big clavicles guarantee perfect ratios. all the guys i posted have either a framecel ribcage or birthing hips, but they have an insane v taper because of their clavicles, therefore proving that clavicles are everything. you have nothing to prove me wrong. if i'm a "schizophrenic retard" then you must be a fucking troglodyte for going back and forth with me on an autist forum of all things
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401 and didntreadlol
ok, make his clavicles smaller and leave everything else unchanged and it looks like shit. just because a ribcage can make a body look worse doesn't change the fact that clavicles are far more important. ratios matter but your clavicles are the main thing that effects the v taper. given that they're both lean, big shoulders with a bad waist looks better than narrow shoulders with a tiny waist
View attachment 330907
this guy has hip bones wider than his ribcage but still has an insane v taper due to his clavicle
Nohips
damn small hips with his frame
 
  • Love it
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 6401 and Deleted member 5656
there are absolutely discrepanices, they are correlated but they aren't the exact same bones so there are discrepancies
shoulder .png

small ribcage + above average clavicle
Looks absolutely normal in proportion. i don't see it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
and clavicles are everything when it comes to determining your ratios. i have posted endless pics proving that with a shit ribcage or wide hips, big clavicles guarantee perfect ratios. all the guys i posted have either a framecel ribcage or birthing hips, but they have an insane v taper because of their clavicles, therefore proving that clavicles are everything. you have nothing to prove me wrong. if i'm a "schizophrenic retard" then you must be a fucking troglodyte for going back and forth with me on an autist forum of all things

"clavicles are everything when it comes to determining your ratios." its not, your waist and ribcage also determine ratio.

"you must be a fucking troglodyte for going back and forth with me on an autist forum of all things" ironic.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
"clavicles are everything when it comes to determining your ratios." its not, your waist and ribcage also determine ratio.
clavicles are everything because it's the main genetic feature that determines ratios. once again, look at the pictures i posted of guys with narrow ribcages or birthing hips still having good ratios because of their long clavicles.
"you must be a fucking troglodyte for going back and forth with me on an autist forum of all things" ironic.
ironic? you're chimping out on an autistic forum because you got proved wrong, then when i point out how stupid it is for you to accuse someone else of being mental you backpeddle.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
My shoulder width is average.
What’s yours?
Show picture without cutting the skull out. That's a good way to see if you look narrow or not irl cause you look way smaller than 18 inch bideltiod on the picture
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6401
clavicles are everything because it's the main genetic feature that determines ratios. once again, look at the pictures i posted of guys with narrow ribcages or birthing hips still having good ratios because of their long clavicles.

ironic? you're chimping out on an autistic forum because you got proved wrong, then when i point out how stupid it is for you to accuse someone else of being mental you backpeddle.

"clavicles are everything because it's the main genetic feature that determines ratios. once again, look at the pictures i posted of guys with narrow ribcages or birthing hips still having good ratios because of their long clavicles." They have good ratios because of small waist and big shoulder, their ribcage are also bigger or equal to their waist not smaller.

So you didn't proof anything wrong, once again making stuff up in your head to think you're right.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Deleted member 6401
it's negligible. no one gives a fuck about your small ribcage if you have broad shoulders, and no one gives a fuck about your barrel ribcage if you have narrow shoulders . SHOULDERS are the bodily symbol of masculinity and dimorphism
My ribcage seems narrower than my shoulder. Someone also commented that my ribcage is narrow. It is something that i can relate to.
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
32
Views
2K
fendinyl
fendinyl
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
22
Views
5K
6foot3Mediterranean
6foot3Mediterranean
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
20
Views
4K
Sphenoid
Sphenoid
Spidermanne2returns
Replies
19
Views
4K
Jay_Arya
Jay_Arya
PsychoDsk
Replies
101
Views
3K
Loveland
Loveland

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top