Is aromasin good for 16?

CoolMan78

CoolMan78

Iron
Joined
Oct 19, 2025
Posts
210
Reputation
275
Title
 
  • +1
Reactions: LDARGymmaxx and coolman985
Listen here CoolMan78 your asking a new question every 10 minutes for the last 5 hours let me direct to the SEARCH BAR
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoaA99, Leo, Greyascension and 4 others
No, most studies using AI show very little results, and AI by itself has not been proven to increase height. It only seems to have an effect when used in conjunction with HGH. This is because estrogen is required to promote bone growth, but it also inhibits the brain’s estrogen function that’s needed for the pituitary gland to stimulate HGH production. So overall, it’s really bad because you’re actually limiting growth.
 
  • +1
Reactions: CoolMan78
No, most studies using AI show very little results, and AI by itself has not been proven to increase height. It only seems to have an effect when used in conjunction with HGH. This is because estrogen is required to promote bone growth, but it also inhibits the brain’s estrogen function that’s needed for the pituitary gland to stimulate HGH production. So overall, it’s really bad because you’re actually limiting growth.
1. rule dont take advice from a user with a grey name
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoaA99, Leo, Mike456 and 1 other person
no argument=your coping because you retarded your brain for 0 height growth:lul:
Motherfuckers will type a paragraph using sophisticated lexis and then write "because you retarded your brain" => they just rely on AI for any response they make, and then if it's not a response directly involved in discourse surrounding actual pharmaceutical use, they won't use AI, and you can see how retarded they truly are, because they are actually incapable of writing in such a manner.
@HTNGrevious
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoaA99, Leo, autisticntmaxer⠀ and 2 others
Motherfuckers will type a paragraph using sophisticated lexis and then write "because you retarded your brain" => they just rely on AI for any response they make, and then if it's not a response directly involved in discourse surrounding actual pharmaceutical use, they won't use AI, and you can see how retarded they truly are, because they are actually incapable of writing in such a manner.
@HTNGrevious
'because u retarded your brain' beautiful English
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Leo, aids and Mike456
Motherfuckers will type a paragraph using sophisticated lexis and then write "because you retarded your brain" => they just rely on AI for any response they make, and then if it's not a response directly involved in discourse surrounding actual pharmaceutical use, they won't use AI, and you can see how retarded they truly are, because they are actually incapable of writing in such a manner.
@HTNGrevious
Listening to educated users with thousands of posts on a forum :no:
Listening to chatgpt because its easier :yes:
 
  • +1
Reactions: CoolMan78, Leo and aids
Motherfuckers will type a paragraph using sophisticated lexis and then write "because you retarded your brain" => they just rely on AI for any response they make, and then if it's not a response directly involved in discourse surrounding actual pharmaceutical use, they won't use AI, and you can see how retarded they truly are, because they are actually incapable of writing in such a manner.
@HTNGrevious
wtf are you yapping about, i only didnt respond seriously to him because he brought up no argument.
 
Listening to educated users with thousands of posts on a forum :no:
Listening to chatgpt because its easier :yes:
Screenshot 2025 10 28 020022
Screenshot 2025 10 28 015606
Screenshot 2025 10 28 015540
not chatgpt... if you engaged with the literature you would understand how true my statements are. this why no one on this forum grows.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 4256214View attachment 4256215View attachment 4256216not chatgpt... if you engaged with the literature you would understand how true my statements are. this why no one on this forum grows.
1761632728145

Fucker can't even interpret his own literature JFL.
The literature that suggests AI does work is regarding long-term non-steroidal AI use.
Of course using letrozole for only 2 years with no other intervention will not meaningfully increase PAH. But this one study does not disprove the claims nor does it demonstrate you're not a faggot who can't think for himself. I never disagreed with your initial claim. I am clarifying that you're an idiot.
@HTNGrevious
 
  • +1
Reactions: Leo
View attachment 4256251
Fucker can't even interpret his own literature JFL.
The literature that suggests AI does work is regarding long-term non-steroidal AI use.
Of course using letrozole for only 2 years with no other intervention will not meaningfully increase PAH. But this one study does not disprove the claims nor does it demonstrate you're not a faggot who can't think for himself. I never disagreed with your initial claim. I am clarifying that you're an idiot.
@HTNGrevious
Screenshot 2025 10 28 074321


The author can’t even make a proper conclusion about whether the long-term effects work well wtf did you mean he is suggesting annd i gave studies of long term AI use to disprove you to holy iqlet:lul:, good job cutting that part out retarded nigger. Once the fusion program of estrogen starts, the treatment becomes pretty much useless, actually even if all estrogen receptors stop working, the effects of the fusion program would still continue jfl
 
Last edited:
View attachment 4256251
Fucker can't even interpret his own literature JFL.
The literature that suggests AI does work is regarding long-term non-steroidal AI use.
Of course using letrozole for only 2 years with no other intervention will not meaningfully increase PAH. But this one study does not disprove the claims nor does it demonstrate you're not a faggot who can't think for himself. I never disagreed with your initial claim. I am clarifying that you're an idiot.
@HTNGrevious

"Of course using letrozole for only 2 years with no other intervention will not meaningfully increase PAH."

:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: you literally disproved your whole defense shit skin. Why don’t aromatase inhibitors work by themselves in studies only when combined with other drugs? Maybe it’s because aromatase inhibitors themselves are just cope, and the other drugs used are the ones actually doing the work. If they can literally delay closure and all your signaling factor production stays the same, yet there’s still no increase in height... yes you make the obvious conclusion here.
 
nah bro don’t touch aromasin at 16. that shit messes with your hormones bad you’re still growing and it can fuck up your puberty mood and gains long term unless a doc told you to take it (which they won’t), stay away from that shit.
 
"Of course using letrozole for only 2 years with no other intervention will not meaningfully increase PAH."

:lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul: you literally disproved your whole defense shit skin. Why don’t aromatase inhibitors work by themselves in studies only when combined with other drugs? Maybe it’s because aromatase inhibitors themselves are just cope, and the other drugs used are the ones actually doing the work. If they can literally delay closure and all your signaling factor production stays the same, yet there’s still no increase in height... yes you make the obvious conclusion here.
I didn't make any argument you retard, I am simply demonstrating that you cannot interpret studies because you are low IQ.

I never had any argument for/against AI, I am stating you are a retard, as aforementioned.
 
I didn't make any argument you retard, I am simply demonstrating that you cannot interpret studies because you are low IQ.

I never had any argument for/against AI, I am stating you are a retard, as aforementioned.
No clearly it was you who cannot interpret studies, because you are suggesting AI is useful when the study quite literally suggested the opposite. Furthermore, I am either right or wrong, yet you chose to disagree with me, which means you are opposing my position. If you are afraid to argue and just want to insult, that is fine. Such rhetorical talking points hidden behind a wall are common on this website, because the moment you step into the debating ring with me, you will be destroyed and i am glad you understand this
 
No clearly it was you who cannot interpret studies, because you are suggesting AI is useful when the study quite literally suggested the opposite. Furthermore, I am either right or wrong, yet you chose to disagree with me, which means you are opposing my position. If you are afraid to argue and just want to insult, that is fine. Such rhetorical talking points hidden behind a wall are common on this website, because the moment you step into the debating ring with me, you will be destroyed and i am glad you understand this
Holy fuck, you are actually a fucking faggot.
Either you are incapable of being particular about your lexis, or you genuinely just contradict yourself because you are a spastic cunt.
No, most studies using AI show very little results, and AI by itself has not been proven to increase height. It only seems to have an effect when used in conjunction with HGH. This is because estrogen is required to promote bone growth, but it also inhibits the brain’s estrogen function that’s needed for the pituitary gland to stimulate HGH production. So overall, it’s really bad because you’re actually limiting growth.
If it yields no effect, then the literature with a control group versus AI-only group versus HGH+AI group versus HGH only group would show the HGH and HGH+AI group to have grown the same amount.
But, in no literature is this the case.

You are big monkey dumb faggot cannot talk I do not want talk to you so that is why I not talk many big word, understanding?
 
Holy fuck, you are actually a fucking faggot.
Either you are incapable of being particular about your lexis, or you genuinely just contradict yourself because you are a spastic cunt.

If it yields no effect, then the literature with a control group versus AI-only group versus HGH+AI group versus HGH only group would show the HGH and HGH+AI group to have grown the same amount.
But, in no literature is this the case.

You are big monkey dumb faggot cannot talk I do not want talk to you so that is why I not talk many big word, understanding?
No, this is retarded. First of all, this is not at all how studies are interpreted. You simply cannot reject the other studies to prove AI by a simple comparison between other studies. First of all, in the study comparison you are linking, are the ages of the kids identical? Their bone age? How far into puberty? Their hormonal levels? Etc. So many factors can be taken into place, and I can’t believe you are resorting to making such low IQ points. Which is further made clear by the contradicting literature

Aromatase inhibitor most likely makes highly sensitive the estrogen receptor, which makes its effect at blocking estrogen pretty much useless unless you’re using death amounts of inhibiting estrogen and retarding your brain like you seem to have done.

Screenshot 2025 10 28 093052
Screenshot 2025 10 28 093144
 
No, this is retarded. First of all, this is not at all how studies are interpreted. You simply cannot reject the other studies to prove AI by a simple comparison between other studies. First of all, in the study comparison you are linking, are the ages of the kids identical? Their bone age? How far into puberty? Their hormonal levels? Etc. So many factors can be taken into place, and I can’t believe you are resorting to making such low IQ points. Which is further made clear by the contradicting literature

Aromatase inhibitor most likely makes highly sensitive the estrogen receptor, which makes its effect at blocking estrogen pretty much useless unless you’re using death amounts of inhibiting estrogen and retarding your brain like you seem to have done.

View attachment 4257202View attachment 4257203
I didn't link a study because there is no one study. DNR the rest.
Moron.
 
No, this is retarded. First of all, this is not at all how studies are interpreted. You simply cannot reject the other studies to prove AI by a simple comparison between other studies. First of all, in the study comparison you are linking, are the ages of the kids identical? Their bone age? How far into puberty? Their hormonal levels? Etc. So many factors can be taken into place, and I can’t believe you are resorting to making such low IQ points. Which is further made clear by the contradicting literature

Aromatase inhibitor most likely makes highly sensitive the estrogen receptor, which makes its effect at blocking estrogen pretty much useless unless you’re using death amounts of inhibiting estrogen and retarding your brain like you seem to have done.

View attachment 4257202View attachment 4257203
cope
 

Similar threads

keystrokes
  • Question
Looksmaxxing rape my new cycle
Replies
10
Views
149
doctormeow2
doctormeow2
deaflty0323
Replies
6
Views
101
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
deaflty0323
Replies
10
Views
165
Francisco_Bs
Francisco_Bs
deaflty0323
Replies
18
Views
249
Snucell
Snucell
ropemaxxxxxxxx
Replies
3
Views
128
test monster
test monster

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top