DrTony
Master
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Posts
- 1,537
- Reputation
- 2,729
Discuss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How do you explain that a lot of females are NOT physically attracted to many faces you, as a male would deem as good looking, although they do acknowledge their appeal/beauty in an abstract but non-sexual way
To an extentDiscuss
Wrong. This is fucking cyclical argument. The question is how do you explain the observable fact that not all women are attracted to the same type of guy no matter how good looking YOU think he is.Kinda, but the problem is, all beholders (foids) have basically the same tastes/standards.
If they aren't good looking then sometimes they'll have a thing for nonchads to cope with the fact that chad doesn't want themKinda, but the problem is, all beholders (foids) have basically the same tastes/standards.
No I am not talking about other external factors or confounding variables. They are simply NOT into these guys. They don't feel sexually attracted, very simple.
I guess an analogy would be how some people like certain foods while these same foods are despised by others
My point was, yes, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder in the sense of a foid finding a Chad attractive, or a man finding a hot women attractive, but not other creatures. A cat for example wouldn't find them attractive since he belongs to a different species, can't breed with humans so it would be useless biologically for him to feel attraction to people.Wrong. This is fucking cyclical argument. The question is how do you explain the observable fact that not all women are attracted to the same type of guy no matter how good looking YOU think he is.
You are basically refuting the question/reality.
Then what is your point exactly? Even if we consider a man to be attractive to women, he isn't? Do you have any examples to get your points across? I am willing to listen.
NVM, I just skimmed through the thread. What would your logical explanation be for this phenomenon? Of course there is no such thing as a universal slayer. No matter how attractive a guy is, he won't be able to slay every female there is. Some women just won't be attracted to them. Sometimes a PSL 7 can get mogged by a PSL 5 due to a number of factors. For instance, the 5 is far more outgoing whereas the 7 is really introverted.
View attachment 8125
Alot of people tought Micheal Cera looked cute after superbad, while others tought he looked super ugly (especially lookism lmao). I tough he looked good after watching it, and even when being black pilled on looks i dont think he looks half bad.
But nobody would look at this picture and think this is an ugly guy
View attachment 8127
I would say it mostly objektive and small part subkektive. Height body figure and some facial feutures. I would say are objektive. Whats subjektibe i would say eye color and hair color hair texturr.
And just because some psl autistic think guy is attractive dosent matter. Womens opininon always nummer 1 for mens look
Women's opinion is number 1, agreed, but women's opinion differ A LOT
. Hair texture and eye color is certainly NOT the only thing that is subjective, the whole face is.
No, it's in the bones.
He's trolling man. Also did u see my question to you yesterday. I need ur help on answering somethingWrong. This is fucking cyclical argument. The question is how do you explain the observable fact that not all women are attracted to the same type of guy no matter how good looking YOU think he is.
You are basically refuting the question/reality.