Is IPD/bizygomatic (ESR) a bad ratio? A new ratio for eye spacing?

But does it or does it not look more masculine?

Here's that morph, but ICD/IPD is preserved
View attachment 3759141
The eyes are definitely not more masculine. The second pic is uncanny valley. In reality there is a limit to how far you can go in face size. I think the best measurements for getting a proportional, masculine skull are at the middle, the average.

A lot of people seem to go along with the idea of a skull mog (bigger is better) and I think it's bs. A bigger skull would be evolutionarily disadvantageous because there would be more surface area to get hit. It doesn't convey dominance, if anything it makes you look like a bobble head.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
Screenshot 20250522 063752 CapCut
on 1st glance the eyes on left look wider since there's less space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle,

2nd looks wider bc of the extra space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle

Ofc this won't have such a big difference irl unless your heavily deformed.

And also LCL to ICD have impact on how esr is perceived.
 
To prove that the length of the LCL does have impact on esr appearance
But it doesn't though. The eyes close setedness look the same as before, just zoomed in. Trust me I attempted what you are saying for a whole week. It didn't work.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Djimo
View attachment 3759152 on 1st glance the eyes on left look wider since there's less space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle,

2nd looks wider bc of the extra space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle

Ofc this won't have such a big difference irl unless your heavily deformed.

And also LCL to ICD have impact on how esr is perceived.
Not to bash on you, but this has no affect on the face and you're introducing too many confounding variables.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Djimo
View attachment 3759152 on 1st glance the eyes on left look wider since there's less space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle,

2nd looks wider bc of the extra space between the lateral canthus and the temporal muscle

Ofc this won't have such a big difference irl unless your heavily deformed.

And also LCL to ICD have impact on how esr is perceived.
go to sleep man. good effort tho I appreciate it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Djimo
The second pic is uncanny valley. In reality there is a limit to how far you can go in face size
Fully agree. My point was that skull size is what makes a face look feminine or masculine. It's actually better for a man to have degree of feminity in his face, because then he benefits from human's affinity towards the feminine. To take a note from MGTOW, we are a gynocentric species.

I've always said that andro Chad is the Chad that benefits the most of society. It's actually better for a Chad to have his bizygomatic breadth be bellow 50th percentile. That gives him the pretty look. People would call him pretty boy, but women would lose their mind over an androygenous Chad, you know how like women like other women, because of their cute looks or something? Same principle. Women basically just want a man who is huge like 6'5 but head is kind of small, so they have big pretty eyes and shit like that.
A lot of people seem to go along with the idea of a skull mog (bigger is better) and I think it's bs. A bigger skull would be evolutionarily disadvantageous because there would be more surface area to get hit. It doesn't convey dominance, if anything it makes you look like a bobble head.
No. Because the skull mog is proportional to the body, so big skull is great on 6'5 and shit like that. I thought it was obvious that I meant it should be in proportion to the body. More surface area to be hit doesn't matter if that skull is thicker because its width is proportional as well. Size is incredibly important to our perception of things. In Pixar, they call it "character language." It's something we all instinctually understand. Feminine = small, ditsy. Masculine = big, robust, imposing.
Final
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Ryder, mandiblade, flatcheck213 and 1 other person
I feel like ICD is more important than ESR. The reason why I think this is that I see people with bad ESR due to a wide face but the eyes don't look close set.

I was talking to @iblamemygenes yesterday and he made the point that Jordan Barrett doesn't look like he has close set eyes even though his esr is .42/.43, because the actual distance between his eyes is ideal.

To see if eyes are properly spaced I've created a new ratio. The ratio is the (ICD/IPD). (In the perfect face, the ICD should approximately be half the IPD; .5 ). I've also thought of another ratio; (eyeball diameter/IPD). I feel like measuring by the eyeball would be more precise since some people have different medial canthus positions, angles, lengths, bodies, etc. But it might be harder to pinpoint the start and end of the eyeball by looking at a picture. But what do yall think?
Pretty sure
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NuclearGeo20
Fully agree. My point was that skull size is what makes a face look feminine or masculine. It's actually better for a man to have degree of feminity in his face, because then he benefits from human's affinity towards the feminine. To take a note from MGTOW, we are a gynocentric species.

I've always said that andro Chad is the Chad that benefits the most of society. It's actually better for a Chad to have his bizygomatic breadth be bellow 50th percentile. That gives him the pretty look. People would call him pretty boy, but women would lose their mind over an androygenous Chad, you know how like women like other women, because of their cute looks or something? Same principle. Women basically just want a man who is huge like 6'5 but head is kind of small, so they have big pretty eyes and shit like that.

No. Because the skull mog is proportional to the body, so big skull is great on 6'5 and shit like that. I thought it was obvious that I meant it should be in proportion to the body. More surface area to be hit doesn't matter if that skull is thicker because its width is proportional as well. Size is incredibly important to our perception of things. In Pixar, they call it "character language." It's something we all instinctually understand. Feminine = small, ditsy. Masculine = big, robust, imposing.
View attachment 3759173
You're overthinking. If youre average in all metrics you will be peak masculinity and appeal. A 65mm ipd average skull will mog 68mm ipd big skull because it becomes unideal, even you maintain proportion. In reality the eyes will look small and you'll look sped.

I disagree that pretty boys need a bizygomatic that is less than 50th percentile. Look at Chico

Also pretty boy is unideal. Chad archetype mogs anyway. The only thing keeping a pretty boy afloat is averageness and health markets
 
  • +1
Reactions: mandiblade and Lookologist003
Feminine = small, ditsy. Masculine = big, robust, imposing.
Final
@thecel
Here's the full spectrum of bizygomatic breadths from "Aaaaaa! Kwaii sugi!" to "Ey, bitch, dtf?"
Final
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, mandiblade, flatcheck213 and 1 other person
@thecel
Here's the full spectrum of bizygomatic breadths from "Aaaaaa! Kwaii sugi!" to "Ey, bitch, dtf?"
View attachment 3759186
Oh my gosh, these morphs are so good!!

Normal skull mogs. 1st one makes Jordan look too much like a girl, like you predicted. 3rd one is too striking. Average will always mog.

Good job bro, high iq contribution 👏 👍 👌
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Lookologist003

Attachments

  • 4270787_IMG_3695.jpeg
    4270787_IMG_3695.jpeg
    7.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 3214591_images_68.jpeg
    3214591_images_68.jpeg
    57.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 3327923_lachowski_and_sean_opry.jpg
    3327923_lachowski_and_sean_opry.jpg
    144.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 4192086_1718303750088.jpeg
    4192086_1718303750088.jpeg
    45.1 KB · Views: 0
  • 175bc04f4634ed130cccf69c08a9d559.jpg
    175bc04f4634ed130cccf69c08a9d559.jpg
    99.2 KB · Views: 0
  • 1990b77bc06336062996dd28cb2daf67.jpg
    1990b77bc06336062996dd28cb2daf67.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Zayn-and-Harry-Styles-Cannes-2013-billboard-1548.jpg
    Zayn-and-Harry-Styles-Cannes-2013-billboard-1548.jpg
    564.2 KB · Views: 0
  • GettyImages-142308654.jpg
    GettyImages-142308654.jpg
    136.5 KB · Views: 0
  • 572998_032515-cc-ZaynHarryThumb.jpg
    572998_032515-cc-ZaynHarryThumb.jpg
    226.2 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Zayn Malik and Chico are both pretty boys, but one has a huge skull, and the other has a small one. Perhaps skull size only differs in the neurochranium and not the splachocranium because their faces seem pretty similar size wise and proportion wise. Thoughts? @Lookologist003 @thecel
 
"Skull mogger" even though his splanchocranium is pretty much proportional to everyone else.
 

Attachments

  • wvzKu8haZEUDslAbRFZj64DBepyq4B.jpg
    wvzKu8haZEUDslAbRFZj64DBepyq4B.jpg
    173.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 315ddf19aa87b3bc7f7571b935aca3b831-16-dolph-lundgren-creed.rsocial.w1200.jpg
    315ddf19aa87b3bc7f7571b935aca3b831-16-dolph-lundgren-creed.rsocial.w1200.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 0
  • ca4a7bf8c1410e4e9350ccc286f499ae.jpg
    ca4a7bf8c1410e4e9350ccc286f499ae.jpg
    73.7 KB · Views: 0
  • Sylvester-Stallone-Dolph-Lundgren-ROCKY-IV-080122-f6da7b9a717d4ce88da3bc292244108d.jpg
    Sylvester-Stallone-Dolph-Lundgren-ROCKY-IV-080122-f6da7b9a717d4ce88da3bc292244108d.jpg
    117.3 KB · Views: 0
@coolio :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: coolio
No offense your new ratio is shit. OCD is better than ESR yes but it will still be considered slightly cope unless terrible. ESR is cope if your icd and mfr is good and if it is also above .42. Most important ratios for eye spacing perception is 1. ICD (1 eye apart if you have normal pfl which is common and doesn’t vary as much as skull size does) 2. MFR (atleast .93 for eyes to look normal) 3. Nose width (1-1 with icd) 4. Esr/ocd again doesn’t matter if the rest are good and this is atleast .43
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
No offense your new ratio is shit. OCD is better than ESR yes but it will still be considered slightly cope unless terrible. ESR is cope if your icd and mfr is good and if it is also above .42. Most important ratios for eye spacing perception is 1. ICD (1 eye apart if you have normal pfl which is common and doesn’t vary as much as skull size does) 2. MFR (atleast .93 for eyes to look normal) 3. Nose width (1-1 with icd) 4. Esr/ocd again doesn’t matter if the rest are good and this is atleast .43
MFR is cope.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
No offense your new ratio is shit. OCD is better than ESR yes but it will still be considered slightly cope unless terrible. ESR is cope if your icd and mfr is good and if it is also above .42. Most important ratios for eye spacing perception is 1. ICD (1 eye apart if you have normal pfl which is common and doesn’t vary as much as skull size does) 2. MFR (atleast .93 for eyes to look normal) 3. Nose width (1-1 with icd) 4. Esr/ocd again doesn’t matter if the rest are good and this is atleast .43
I agree somewhat, I need to think about this though
 
MFR is cope.
fucking retard 😭 my esr is .42-.43 but my mfr is around 1.1 just because i have a fucking gargantuan skull with a shitty upper maxilla, and it literally make my eye seperation appear NORMAL despite my bizygo
 
  • +1
Reactions: xnj
No offense your new ratio is shit. OCD is better than ESR yes but it will still be considered slightly cope unless terrible. ESR is cope if your icd and mfr is good and if it is also above .42. Most important ratios for eye spacing perception is 1. ICD (1 eye apart if you have normal pfl which is common and doesn’t vary as much as skull size does) 2. MFR (atleast .93 for eyes to look normal) 3. Nose width (1-1 with icd) 4. Esr/ocd again doesn’t matter if the rest are good and this is atleast .43
i agree with this, additionally pflfw (pfl-bizygo) is extremely important for perceived eye spacing

alex schlab is a decent example of having good eye spacing by every metric BUT esr
 
  • +1
Reactions: xnj
i agree with this, additionally pflfw (pfl-bizygo) is extremely important for perceived eye spacing

alex schlab is a decent example of having good eye spacing by every metric BUT esr
and me:forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: coolio
i agree with this, additionally pflfw (pfl-bizygo) is extremely important for perceived eye spacing

alex schlab is a decent example of having good eye spacing by every metric BUT esr
Just means wide skull yea
 
  • +1
Reactions: coolio
fucking retard 😭 my esr is .42-.43 but my mfr is around 1.1 just because i have a fucking gargantuan skull with a shitty upper maxilla, and it literally make my eye seperation appear NORMAL despite my bizygo
Barrett ratios, ur fwhr is like above 2 right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: coolio
fucking retard 😭 my esr is .42-.43 but my mfr is around 1.1 just because i have a fucking gargantuan skull with a shitty upper maxilla, and it literally make my eye seperation appear NORMAL despite my bizygo
Mesurements matter more. Have you gotten your ipd checked?
 
these niggas are retards :lul::lul::lul:
I put DNR in the thread for a reason. A lot of the info in this thread is trash. Some of the information is valuable but doesn't tell the whole story. I think measurements that go towards the average are better. Such as 64-65mm IPD, 141-143mm bizygomatic width, average ICD, etc. The only thing that can be above average is PFL. Relying on ratios is stupid when you can get your face measured digitally by an eye doctor and that will tell the full story about your attractiveness rather than relying on a ratio that tells you a single number and doesn't point to the culprit of the disharmony. That's the point of this whole thread. The only ratio that is kind of valuable in this thread would be ( Pupil to Inner Canthus / IPD). And even then I'm still going to get my face measured because that ratio could be off due to someone having a shorter main body of the inner canthus or a longer one, so it may make it harder to measure everyone accurately. It would be best if we could use the eye as an independent variable in the ratio, but it's hard to pinpoint the ending place of the eyeball behind the inner canthus. So this thread goes back to the debate on ratios vs measurements.

The reason I think average measurements are better is because as the skull grows bigger or smaller, the most important factor for attractiveness, which is the eye spacing, begins to change incrementally. If we imagine the neurocranium and splanchnocranium growing together proportionally, and if the eye sockets were to remain the same size, the eyes would start to appear big or small inside the head, and since the eyeballs remain the same size for every human regardless of race or gender in non deformed people (24mm), the actual space and bone between the eyeballs themselves will shrink or grow leading to uncanny appearances.

I well explain with the following image. The wide set eyes look uncanny and they are hard to grasp within the mind. The normal proportional eye spacing is easy for the mind to adjust to, and it looks easy to the eye. The close set eyes are somewhat beautiful the gaze is too intense on an actual face in my opinion. If you notice bizygomatic width had nothing to contribute in the actual perception of the eyes, only the spacing between the eyeballs themselves.

@Lookologist003 @thecel
 

Attachments

  • 1748019257452.png
    1748019257452.png
    525.2 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
my ipd is 67.5mm and im central + western european
That's actually really good. The average is around 64-65 so 2.5 mm above will still be harmonious. Plus I've seen Russian and European phenotypes with slightly wide eyes and it doesn't look disharmonious. No OBO for you.
 
That's actually really good. The average is around 64-65 so 2.5 mm above will still be harmonious. Plus I've seen Russian and European phenotypes with slightly wide eyes and it doesn't look disharmonious. No OBO for you.
i need zygo shaving my facial breadth is 160(something)mm
 
i need zygo shaving my facial breadth is 160(something)mm
Fr? Your bizygomatic width is like 3sd above average (average is 141-143). I don't know if zygoma shaving can take off that much mass.
 
Fr? Your bizygomatic width is like 3sd above average (average is 141-143). I don't know if zygoma shaving can take off that much mass.
my lateral proj is insane so i assume it can get me to around .43-.44 esr which is what i really care about, alongside improving all my other width related ratios
 
my lateral proj is insane so i assume it can get me to around .43-.44 esr which is what i really care about, alongside improving all my other width related ratios
bro ESR is bs if your IPD is good, which it is (67.5). Your eyes don't look close set, your face just looks wide. A 160mm wide face is not desirable, but it's better than having close set eyes.

Also be careful of the surgery itself. Are you sure that it's going to give you the result that is desired (high chiseled look) and that it's not going to botch you.
 
bro ESR is bs if your IPD is good, which it is (67.5). Your eyes don't look close set, your face just looks wide. A 160mm wide face is not desirable, but it's better than having close set eyes.

Also be careful of the surgery itself. Are you sure that it's going to give you the result that is desired (high chiseled look) and that it's not going to botch you.
for the most part im sure it will end with me having the result i want, but at the very least it wont impact my facial angularity TOO horribly, i have good gonions, a decent chin, good temples supras etc. my cheekbones are my best feature (angularity wise) in my opinion, but getting shaving wouldnt impact me negatively like it would many other people
 
  • +1
Reactions: NuclearGeo20
I feel like ICD is more important than ESR.

There’s definitely truth to your claim. To support your argument, here are 2 women who have ESR higher than 0.5:

1748028062436
1748028071432


Their ESRs are 0.53 and 0.51.

Now take a look at this woman:

1748028129218


Guess her ESR. What do you estimate her ESR is without measuring? 0.57? 0.60?

Nope it’s 0.498. Lower than the ESRs of the 2 women above.

Her eyes look gigawideset because of her extremely wide ICD.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NuclearGeo20
@NuclearGeo20 why hmm react?
 

Similar threads

bddcoper
Replies
14
Views
266
MagicalWaves
MagicalWaves
charliewillascend
Replies
33
Views
1K
iblamemygenes
iblamemygenes
Futura
Replies
13
Views
2K
Foreverbrad
Foreverbrad
TheBlackpilledOne
Theory String theory
Replies
10
Views
601
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
TheBlackpilledOne
Replies
6
Views
247
DirtyBlonde
DirtyBlonde

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Sicilian Cyclops
  • Zeekie
  • symphony
  • LegendaryKennen
  • soggra
  • NuclearGeo20
Back
Top