Is IPD/bizygomatic (ESR) a bad ratio? A new ratio for eye spacing?

[supersaiyancarp27]

My bad I meant to put thumbs up. I think you're completely right though.

what’s ur conclusion on the correct way to measure eye spacing now

 

[VampyrMaxx]

what’s ur conclusion on the correct way to measure eye spacing now

Measure your Ipd and bizygomatic width seperately.

Under 65mm IPD Narrow set eyes
65mm IPD Properly Set Eyes
Over 65mm IPD Wide Set eyes

Ideal ICD is 33mm

Under 14.3cm narrow face width
14.3cm ideal facial width
Over 14.3cm Wide face

 

[supersaiyancarp27]

Measure your Ipd and bizygomatic width seperately.

Under 65mm IPD Narrow set eyes
65mm IPD Properly Set Eyes
Over 65mm IPD Wide Set eyes

Ideal ICD is 33mm

Under 14.3cm narrow face width
14.3cm ideal facial width
Over 14.3cm Wide face

so divide the icd by the ipd and it should be .5 also is the original esr still relevant

 

[SabiWabi]

WTF Matt Bomer and Jon Erik Hexum both got approximately 25 percent. Am I missing something.

actually i think ur ratio makes sense, i got slightly close set eyes (0.443 esr, around 63 ipd) and i got 25.5 percent, bomer has a high pfl because of his medial canthus, but for a traditional medial canthus length hexum makes sense because his eyes look a bit close set aswell

 

[SabiWabi]

My conclusion is that everything matters for eye harmony, meaning icd, pfl, ipd, ocd, and bizygomatic width in mms and the ratios like icd to bizygo, the measurement you came up with, ipd to bizygo, ocd to bizygo, and pfl to bizygo, so none of these measurements and ratios can be too far out of the ideal, otherwise it would be perceived close or wide set (in the measurement and harmonious aspect, not the eyebrow spacing and nose width perception). However, I this pfl to bizygomatic width is the most important because that can help save close or wide set eyes, for example cookie king has a low ipd, but doesn't look as bad as marko jaric because of his high pfl just talking about harmony wise. And for wide set, your example with anna taylor joy and that asian girl. But besides eye area harmony i would take measurements next to a mirror with a ruler measuring a couple of times to decrease the margin of error, that's because it can be very hard to have a proper tilt in photos taking them itself without distortion and at the perfect angle. But imo you have to eyeball all 4 pillars itself and estimate their proper rating based on the metrics. Imo this gives the most accurate ratings for just estimating, a full analysis wouldn't be as accurate because of perception.

 

[stigmaboy]

@VampyrMaxx dead

 

[ICL]

I feel like ICD is more important than ESR. The reason why I think this is that I see people with bad ESR due to a wide face but the eyes don't look close set.

I was talking to @iblamemygenes yesterday and he made the point that Jordan Barrett doesn't look like he has close set eyes even though his esr is .42/.43, because the actual distance between his eyes is ideal.

To see if eyes are properly spaced I've created a new ratio. The ratio is the (ICD/IPD). (In the perfect face, the ICD should approximately be half the IPD; .5 ). I've also thought of another ratio; (eyeball diameter/IPD). I feel like measuring by the eyeball would be more precise since some people have different medial canthus positions, angles, lengths, bodies, etc. But it might be harder to pinpoint the start and end of the eyeball by looking at a picture. But what do yall think?

Necropost. Sorry.

But we need to note this is redundant as a measurement.

I'll use him as an example:

Many know him as 4ler.
He fails this measurement terribly, yet still has an extremely striking eye region.

56 is worse than T5 according to the measurements

 

[try2beme]

Jordan Barrett's ICD/IPD is .51, so slight unideal but it doesn't really affect anything

You aren’t Jordan Barrett fkn idiot