thenewhebbe
Defender of Israel
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
- Posts
- 8,012
- Reputation
- 5,486
Explain your reasoning
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
BasedDon’t know don’t care
Already did but you keep arguing in bad faith.@Big White Cuck explain
You didnt and I did not argue in bad faithAlready did but you keep arguing in bad faith.
You didnt and I did not argue in bad faith
>Amnesty International
>Muslim Brotherhood
Typical racist iq.
You didnt explain shit nigger, get back in hereAlready did but you keep arguing in bad faith.
I know. I did that in another thread@Big White Cuck thats was about apartheid
No. Because articles have higher value among intellectuals.and you should use your arguments not an article.
In the same way Zionists have connections to Nazis.And it have connections to muslims brothershood
Then you didnt argue against genocide.I know. I did that in another thread
No. Because articles have higher value among intellectuals.
In the same way Zionists have connections to Nazis.
Okay, so the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group" the national part is arguable.. however given Israel's bad PR I would argue they wouldn't want to destroy any national identity, the only current disagreement is probably about Jerusalem's status (If the PLO gave up it's claim on East Jerusalem, every war opposing these sides would be over by tomorrow) and given Israel has reaffirmed they wouldn't annex Gaza and only in their own words "Destroy Hamas", a charge would probably fail very badly.Explain your reasoning
Then you didnt argue against genocide.
I have no issue with articles but i need to je able to respond to your points in a easy way
Nah not at all
You can't even make an argument
The ironyYou can't even make an argument
Then make an argumentThe irony
@ItsOver999 explain your reasoning
This is not about the genocide claim. Most muslims countries still stod strong.Jews did 9/11
After 9/11 7 muslim countries were invaded meaning the muslim countries had to spend money on themselves as opposed to sending money to palestine and therefore Palestine couldnt fight Israel.
The twin towers were owned by a Jew and he took out an insurance policy on the towers 4 days before the attack.
The "evidence" we have that muslims did it is their passports or drivers license somehow survived fires but the black boxes didnt.