is johnny depp brachy?

GerbertJohnson

GerbertJohnson

Indian Bull
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
278
Reputation
183
IMG 5008
IMG 5009
i think so right? his jaws so big it makes it look harmonious so it’s not as noticeable
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: iblamemandible7
Its hard to tell his face looks shorter in some pics and longer in some
 
  • +1
Reactions: GerbertJohnson
brachi doesn't mean being ugly lol most of the psl pretty boy archetype are brachi, dodicofelia tall skull has less appeal
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and GerbertJohnson
My entire family is dolio but I came out brachy for some reason it's actually so nice
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: iblamemandible7
brachi doesn't mean being ugly lol most of the psl pretty boy archetype are brachi, dodicofelia tall skull has less appeal
Brachy doesnt mean ugly but it is a disadvantage, you have to have very good zygo prominence+mandible height and be very lean to look good as a brachy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
Brachy doesnt mean ugly but it is a disadvantage, you have to have very good zygos+mandible height and be very lean to look good as a brachy
wide skull mogs imo look at barret... tall skulled have usually long midface, if you are mcgregor you'll come out unfazed but most of the guys looks like horse
 
How? Wider skull makes your skin stretched out more so even when you lose collagen it's not gonna droop as much as a narrow face
Having excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman trait
 
  • JFL
Reactions: CD34
wide skull mogs imo look at barret... tall skulled have usually long midface, if you are mcgregor you'll come out unfazed but most of the guys looks like horse
Barrett is an exception, long midface is ideal as long as its not in horse territory because it adds dimorphism and volume and a more developed look
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops and CD34
Having excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman trait
99percent of the tall skulled guys have long midface, even the psl god such as maher jon kortajarena mcgregor... it is not the same for brachicefalis
 
How? Wider skull makes your skin stretched out more so even when you lose collagen it's not gonna droop as much as a narrow facer
brachy’s issue is that all the mass is in width so when there is extra soft tissue it can make you look very bloated and wide. but narrow is worse for looking saggy
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamemandible7 and Bryce
Having excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman trait
If it's like Jordans skull yeah it looks comically wide, my skull shape is a lot closer to Meeks just obviously nowhere near as hot JFL. Also people still think 1:1 midface ratio is ideal for men :lul: I have a .99 midface and it's way more dimorphic than these little button nosed dudes
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin
99percent of the tall skulled guys have long midface, even the psl god such as maher jon kortajarena mcgregor... it is not the same for brachicefalis
1745877753724

Long midface looks better than overly compact midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
brachy’s issue is that all the mass is in width so when there is extra soft tissue it can make you look very bloated and wide. but narrow is worse for looking saggy
True thats what I meant to say, Im lowkey biased because Im very brachy and hate it but brachy face doesnt hold up well to aging or getting fat
 
uhm... no ? 1:1 is ideal , it seems to you that he looks good because in the photo he still has a nice fwhr
Ngl I dont feel like doing ratios rn because it hurts but all Im saying is its better to be on the higher range of midface height than the lower range when all else is equal
 
  • +1
Reactions: CD34
Ngl I dont feel like doing ratios rn because it hurts but all Im saying is its better to be on the higher range of midface height than the lower range when all else is equal
yea definitely better have long face then short face
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamemandible7
lots of girls maybe 50/50 would prefer left compact looks more youthful and friendly
He looks more dimorphic and less cutecel on the right, imagine how much better he would look rn if he had a tall skull too
 
  • +1
Reactions: GerbertJohnson
True thats what I meant to say, Im lowkey biased because Im very brachy and hate it but brachy face doesnt hold up well to aging or getting fat
same im brachy + overbite so my face is all cheekbones no jaw but its still infinitely better then epstein face shape
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamemandible7
same im brachy + overbite so my face is all cheekbones no jaw but its still infinitely better then epstein face shape
Yea same it probably wont be too bad once I get fully leanmaxxed and debloated but its just not gonna hold up well once I get past my 20s
 
  • +1
Reactions: GerbertJohnson

Similar threads

Ekko
Replies
19
Views
316
Bigonial
B
0ogrpostcel
Replies
4
Views
190
moze
M
Cjizz
Replies
6
Views
139
rik
rik
AronnMtn
Replies
12
Views
64
AronnMtn
AronnMtn
๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
Replies
19
Views
336
LTNUser
LTNUser

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top