
GerbertJohnson
Indian Bull
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Posts
- 278
- Reputation
- 183


Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i think thats from his gonions being pretty lowIts hard to tell his face looks shorter in some pics and longer in some
Yea true, I think he is brachy because brachys always get nuked by agepilli think thats from his gonions being pretty low
Brachy doesnt mean ugly but it is a disadvantage, you have to have very good zygo prominence+mandible height and be very lean to look good as a brachybrachi doesn't mean being ugly lol most of the psl pretty boy archetype are brachi, dodicofelia tall skull has less appeal
How? Wider skull makes your skin stretched out more so even when you lose collagen it's not gonna droop as much as a narrow facerYea true, I think he is brachy because brachys always get nuked by agepill
wide skull mogs imo look at barret... tall skulled have usually long midface, if you are mcgregor you'll come out unfazed but most of the guys looks like horseBrachy doesnt mean ugly but it is a disadvantage, you have to have very good zygos+mandible height and be very lean to look good as a brachy
Having excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman traitHow? Wider skull makes your skin stretched out more so even when you lose collagen it's not gonna droop as much as a narrow face
Barrett is an exception, long midface is ideal as long as its not in horse territory because it adds dimorphism and volume and a more developed lookwide skull mogs imo look at barret... tall skulled have usually long midface, if you are mcgregor you'll come out unfazed but most of the guys looks like horse
99percent of the tall skulled guys have long midface, even the psl god such as maher jon kortajarena mcgregor... it is not the same for brachicefalisHaving excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman trait
brachy’s issue is that all the mass is in width so when there is extra soft tissue it can make you look very bloated and wide. but narrow is worse for looking saggyHow? Wider skull makes your skin stretched out more so even when you lose collagen it's not gonna droop as much as a narrow facer
If it's like Jordans skull yeah it looks comically wide, my skull shape is a lot closer to Meeks just obviously nowhere near as hot JFL. Also people still think 1:1 midface ratio is ideal for menHaving excellent width and poor height is worse than having good width and good height, tall skull is better because it stretches out the soft tissues even better, and if your face is hyper brachy/short its a subhuman trait
how is long midface ideal lmao it's the biggest harmony turn offBarrett is an exception, long midface is ideal as long as its not in horse territory because it adds dimorphism and volume and a more developed look
99percent of the tall skulled guys have long midface, even the psl god such as maher jon kortajarena mcgregor... it is not the same for brachicefalis
uhm... no ? 1:1 is ideal , it seems to you that he looks good because in the photo he still has a nice fwhrView attachment 3688253
Long midface looks better than overly compact midface
True thats what I meant to say, Im lowkey biased because Im very brachy and hate it but brachy face doesnt hold up well to aging or getting fatbrachy’s issue is that all the mass is in width so when there is extra soft tissue it can make you look very bloated and wide. but narrow is worse for looking saggy
lots of girls maybe 50/50 would prefer left compact looks more youthful and friendlyView attachment 3688253
Long midface looks better than overly compact midface
Ngl I dont feel like doing ratios rn because it hurts but all Im saying is its better to be on the higher range of midface height than the lower range when all else is equaluhm... no ? 1:1 is ideal , it seems to you that he looks good because in the photo he still has a nice fwhr
yea definitely better have long face then short faceNgl I dont feel like doing ratios rn because it hurts but all Im saying is its better to be on the higher range of midface height than the lower range when all else is equal
He looks more dimorphic and less cutecel on the right, imagine how much better he would look rn if he had a tall skull toolots of girls maybe 50/50 would prefer left compact looks more youthful and friendly
same im brachy + overbite so my face is all cheekbones no jaw but its still infinitely better then epstein face shapeTrue thats what I meant to say, Im lowkey biased because Im very brachy and hate it but brachy face doesnt hold up well to aging or getting fat
Yea same it probably wont be too bad once I get fully leanmaxxed and debloated but its just not gonna hold up well once I get past my 20ssame im brachy + overbite so my face is all cheekbones no jaw but its still infinitely better then epstein face shape
The right is not a long midface lolView attachment 3688253
Long midface looks better than overly compact midface