Is my inter-pupillary distance within the normal range?

Are my eyes spaced-out well?

  • Yes, within the normal range

    Votes: 3 18.8%

  • No, narrowly spaced-out

    Votes: 13 81.3%
  • Total voters
    16
D

Deleted member 15081

Sphinx
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Posts
2,801
Reputation
3,048
575ECD19 05D9 4D9F B6E3 5F1A9D78B95B
 
measure it IRL in mirror what distance you get
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2403 and Deleted member 15081
@MisterMercedes @Kingkellz @Thompsonz @LondonVillie
 
Ain’t looking too good ngl
 
damn your fucking ugly
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Haven, fras, Deleted member 14978 and 1 other person
MarkCorrigan said:
measure it IRL in mirror what distance you get
Click to expand...
66-67 mm inter-pupillary distance, 0.46 ES ratio. But few people here say my eyes are narrowly spaced-out. What do you think?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670
USER0213 said:
66-67 mm inter-pupillary distance, 0.46 ES ratio. But few people here say my eyes are narrowly spaced-out. What do you think?
Click to expand...
your zygos are too wide then
 
MarkCorrigan said:
your eye area looks the same as makinithappen
Click to expand...
Not even close, his eyes have upper eyelid exposure, are rounded and not really deep-set, plus he doesn’t have downturned medial canthus, what makes you think he has a similar eye area?
 
USER0213 said:
Not even close, his eyes have upper eyelid exposure, are rounded and not really deep-set, plus he doesn’t have downturned medial canthus, what makes you think he has a similar eye area?
Click to expand...
Z3yk2MO
 
USER0213 said:
Not even close, his eyes have upper eyelid exposure, are rounded and not really deep-set, plus he doesn’t have downturned medial canthus, what makes you think he has a similar eye area?
Click to expand...
in my opionon his eye area mogs slight tbh, better color and no nct
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670
How’s it looking boys @volcelfatcel @chaddyboi66
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chaddyboi66 and volcelfatcel
MarkCorrigan said:
View attachment 1401904
Click to expand...
Upper eye lid exposure, straight medial canthus, high set eyebrows. In what world are my eyes similar to this guy? You are just saying that cause he is an Indian like me. You just want to stick to the fact that “two Indians will look same”
 
USER0213 said:
Upper eye lid exposure, straight medial canthus, high set eyebrows. In what world are my eyes similar to this guy? You are just saying that cause he is an Indian like me. You just want to stick to the fact that “two Indians will look same”
Click to expand...
i didn't even know you were indian

he has a better eye area than you, tho similar
 
MarkCorrigan said:
cope
Click to expand...
Show me the difference, same thick eyebrows that extend past lateral canthus, same medial canthus and eye shape, similar hooding. The only 2 differences are that he has higher degrees of positive canthal tilt which is feminine, while I have 4-5 degrees of positive canthal tilt and he has green eyes.
 
Tankymax said:
in my opionon his eye area mogs slight tbh, better color and no nct
Click to expand...
I don’t have negative canthal tilt, I have less darker brown eyes than him, his has a lot of upper eyelid exposure, he doesn’t have a downturned medial canthus.
 
USER0213 said:
I don’t have negative canthal tilt, I have less darker brown eyes than him, his has a lot of upper eyelid exposure, he doesn’t have a downturned medial canthus.
Click to expand...
hmm it looked like nct on first fglance maybe its neutral, but something is making u to have this sad eyes look maybe nct hooding and pfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670
Tankymax said:
hmm it looked like nct on first fglance maybe its neutral, but something is making u to have this sad eyes look maybe nct hooding and pfl
Click to expand...
I have a PFL of 33 mm and I have neutral hooding, slight squinting can cause the eyes to seem negatively hooded -
AC55BB5C 9262 4EF1 96C8 C9C254797D44
 
1636793693491
scleral show and ratio could be closer to 3 ipd seems about righrt, could be a bit wider since cheeks are wider
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
You have NCT
 
Lol
Lolzz
Lolz


this bitch eye area mogs u
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chaddyboi66
This is from @StrangerDanger
1636823798364
 
Your eye area is really good tbh
It’s what separates you from other south Asians. You probably have one of the best on the site
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 15081
USER0213 said:
This picture is lens distorted, here are the measurements for the picture in the thread -
View attachment 1402391View attachment 1402390
View attachment 1402393
As you can see I have an ES ratio of 0.46. You can zoom in an check multiple times
Click to expand...
The picture you just sent is distorted, not the other one. Lens distortion also only contributes to the ES ratio being higher since it narrows the facial dimensions on the edges, so it wouldnt lower your ES Ratio. Therefore the other measurement is more accurate. Your Es ratio is obviously low, without a doubt. No one with an 0.46 es ratio would have an eye spacing that appears to look that way
 
delusionalretard said:
The picture you just sent is distorted, not the other one. Lens distortion also only contributes to the ES ratio being higher since it narrows the facial dimensions on the edges, so it wouldnt lower your ES Ratio. Therefore the other measurement is more accurate. Your Es ratio is obviously low, without a doubt. No one with an 0.46 es ratio would have an eye spacing that appears to look that way
Click to expand...
Let me enlighten you a little, that picture I took was from my main camera and it was of a reflection of me. Mirrors sometimes don't show the real picture, now if you add the fact that there is also a lens involved on top of that then it can make the image lens distorted. Nearly every ES ratio measurement involves a picture of a 'real person', not the picture of the 'reflection' -
HGF2wlpk 400x400
Screenshot 20211113 231400

You clearly are coping way too hard by showing a picture that is clearly not taken properly.
I don't understand, why do you guys try to misguide people😑
 
USER0213 said:
I don't have negative canthal tilt -
View attachment 1402065
Click to expand...
no NCT doesnt matter when the lowest point of your bottom eyelid dips under the medial canthus and your upper lid is negatively tilted. it may be technically neutral/positive but it sure appears like NCT
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20211113-144616~3.jpg
    Screenshot_20211113-144616~3.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 13
USER0213 said:
Let me enlighten you a little, that picture I took was from my main camera and it was of a reflection of me. Mirrors sometimes don't show the real picture, now if you add the fact that there is also a lens involved on top of that then it can make the image lens distorted. Nearly every ES ratio measurement involves a picture of a 'real person', not the picture of the 'reflection' -
View attachment 1402412 View attachment 1402415
You clearly are coping way too hard by showing a picture that is clearly not taken properly.
I don't understand, why do you guys try to misguide people😑
Click to expand...
Go take a picture with your back camera, stand 2 feet away from camera to minimize distortion as much as possible like this thread stickied in the ratings section https://looksmax.org/threads/gtfih-...res-for-rating-and-looksmaxxing-advice.90748/ Take 10 pictures or whatever, how many you need for your sample and calculate the average ES ratio you have in all of them. I can promise you 100% that you do not have an 0.46 ES Ratio. 100% It will fall within 0.41-0.43 range 100% No doubts about it Go ahead and try. Do it It's over for your looks knowledge
 
dakchuh said:
no NCT doesnt matter when the lowest point of your bottom eyelid dips under the medial canthus and your upper lid is negatively tilted. it may be technically neutral/positive but it sure appears like NCT
Click to expand...
O'pry has neutral hooding, now cope -
IMG 0429
IMG 04292

Even his supra-orbitals look tilted downwards in some photos
 
delusionalretard said:
Go take a picture with your back camera, stand 2 feet away from camera to minimize distortion as much as possible like this thread stickied in the ratings section https://looksmax.org/threads/gtfih-...res-for-rating-and-looksmaxxing-advice.90748/ Take 10 pictures or whatever, how many you need for your sample and calculate the average ES ratio you have in all of them. I can promise you 100% that you do not have an 0.46 ES Ratio. 100% It will fall within 0.41-0.43 range 100% No doubts about it Go ahead and try. Do it It's over for your looks knowledge
Click to expand...
Will not take advice from a
Chrome screenshot 1636826233042

like you.
 
USER0213 said:
O'pry has neutral hooding, now cope -
View attachment 1402436View attachment 1402437
Even his supra-orbitals look tilted downwards in some photos
Click to expand...
yeah, his eyes do appear to be slightly negatively tilted but he has an actual positive canthal tilt and no droopy bottom eyelid. his eyes are also very angular. in your case you have bigly droopy lid and a pretty much neutral tilt with no angularity. you dont have eyes like o'pry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

xdw15
Serious Inject T to max the normal range
Replies
3
Views
53
19NorCel
19NorCel
6became7
ES Ratio + Additional Implementation of a Zygo-Pupillary Angle.
Replies
2
Views
130
Bryce
Bryce
iblamemaxillas
Serious I need to know if my maxilla is recessed or "normal"
Replies
13
Views
716
iraqi
iraqi
choppedshyt
Over My little cousin is developmentally fucked and it's his parents fault
Replies
11
Views
172
SubSigma
SubSigma
i eat organs
Required PSL reading - the infamous ORB letter:
Replies
6
Views
171
McSkziofren
McSkziofren

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top