is preferring Eurocentric features racist?

teddy101

teddy101

THE GREATEST GREY IN ORG HISTORY
Joined
Jan 24, 2026
Posts
473
Reputation
647
NO YOU ARE NOT RACIST



first off lets get this straight

if you actually did the research you would find out that even other ethnic groups find white people more attractive on average and no its not "but saar white ppl pushed this standard up our throat"




attractivness

attractiveness is largely suspected to be caused by three things

high averageness
symmetry
health indicators

and of these the one that is concerned with Eurocentric faces attractiveness is averageness and cause of large media coverage even a nigger in mumbai slumbs seen more attratvie white than indians and connects attractiveness with white




how it actually happened

europeans built and dominated modeling, movies, and mainstream media. when that media spread to african and asian countries a few things happened

1. it was built and introduced with the help and education of europeans
2. ethnic countries adopted european standards instead of building their own
3. even when ethnic media existed nobody watched it because it was low effort and poorly produced so the space got dominated by white faces

the repeated exposure to white faces in media led to them being perceived as the standard of attractiveness worldwide.




the only real competition

the only thing actually contesting white beauty standards right now is K-Pop. and you can clearly see it working. teens across the world are becoming more attracted to east asian men because of it.

yet even then whites are putting more ethnic people into their own media than ethnic groups are doing for themselves.




the point

it is stupid to say eurocentric averageness is seen as more attractive because europeans are inherently superior looking. that is stupid but the fault is ethnics niggers not europeans fault

eurocentric averageness is NOT biologically attractvie dumb racist

and the ones responsible for that are not europeans. europeans did what they had to do and built dominant media. the fault lies with the ethnics themselves for not building their own competing media and representation.

you have to make that distinction we are the problem not whites


that person isn't racist stop calling whites racist cause of preferences



also fuck you idoits that want white fiod but cry "eurocentric beauty standards ruined dating for ethnics" fuck you from the bottom of my heart
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: слон, GhenCohen, mirinnnasal and 6 others
bump
low effort post but atleast its somehting
 
  • +1
Reactions: слон, tomahawk and lowtierdalit
bumo
 
  • +1
Reactions: слон, tomahawk and lowtierdalit
bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
dnr I'm racist
 
  • +1
Reactions: GhenCohen and mirinnnasal
NO YOU ARE NOT RACIST



first off lets get this straight

if you actually did the research you would find out that even other ethnic groups find white people more attractive on average and no its not "but saar white ppl pushed this standard up our throat"




attractivness

attractiveness is largely suspected to be caused by three things

high averageness
symmetry
health indicators

and of these the one that is concerned with Eurocentric faces attractiveness is averageness and cause of large media coverage even a nigger in mumbai slumbs seen more attratvie white than indians and connects attractiveness with white



how it actually happened

europeans built and dominated modeling, movies, and mainstream media. when that media spread to african and asian countries a few things happened

1. it was built and introduced with the help and education of europeans
2. ethnic countries adopted european standards instead of building their own
3. even when ethnic media existed nobody watched it because it was low effort and poorly produced so the space got dominated by white faces

the repeated exposure to white faces in media led to them being perceived as the standard of attractiveness worldwide.




the only real competition

the only thing actually contesting white beauty standards right now is K-Pop. and you can clearly see it working. teens across the world are becoming more attracted to east asian men because of it.

yet even then whites are putting more ethnic people into their own media than ethnic groups are doing for themselves.




the point

it is stupid to say eurocentric averageness is seen as more attractive because europeans are inherently superior looking. that is stupid but the fault is ethnics niggers not europeans fault

eurocentric averageness is NOT biologically attractvie dumb racist

and the ones responsible for that are not europeans. europeans did what they had to do and built dominant media. the fault lies with the ethnics themselves for not building their own competing media and representation.

you have to make that distinction we are the problem not whites


that person isn't racist stop calling whites racist cause of preferences



also fuck you idoits that want white fiod but cry "eurocentric beauty standards ruined dating for ethnics" fuck you from the bottom of my heart
Low iq bt mirin d effort
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
NO YOU ARE NOT RACIST



first off lets get this straight

if you actually did the research you would find out that even other ethnic groups find white people more attractive on average and no its not "but saar white ppl pushed this standard up our throat"




attractivness

attractiveness is largely suspected to be caused by three things

high averageness
symmetry
health indicators

and of these the one that is concerned with Eurocentric faces attractiveness is averageness and cause of large media coverage even a nigger in mumbai slumbs seen more attratvie white than indians and connects attractiveness with white



how it actually happened

europeans built and dominated modeling, movies, and mainstream media. when that media spread to african and asian countries a few things happened

1. it was built and introduced with the help and education of europeans
2. ethnic countries adopted european standards instead of building their own
3. even when ethnic media existed nobody watched it because it was low effort and poorly produced so the space got dominated by white faces

the repeated exposure to white faces in media led to them being perceived as the standard of attractiveness worldwide.




the only real competition

the only thing actually contesting white beauty standards right now is K-Pop. and you can clearly see it working. teens across the world are becoming more attracted to east asian men because of it.

yet even then whites are putting more ethnic people into their own media than ethnic groups are doing for themselves.




the point

it is stupid to say eurocentric averageness is seen as more attractive because europeans are inherently superior looking. that is stupid but the fault is ethnics niggers not europeans fault

eurocentric averageness is NOT biologically attractvie dumb racist

and the ones responsible for that are not europeans. europeans did what they had to do and built dominant media. the fault lies with the ethnics themselves for not building their own competing media and representation.

you have to make that distinction we are the problem not whites


that person isn't racist stop calling whites racist cause of preferences



also fuck you idoits that want white fiod but cry "eurocentric beauty standards ruined dating for ethnics" fuck you from the bottom of my heart
Everything is made up. Racism doesnt exist
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
explain more i cant undertand you
 
  • +1
Reactions: LXR
explain more i cant undertand you
What do you mean by racist ? Usually people say its discrimination on basis of how a person looks, their skin color, their ethnicity, their culture, their physical features. But discrimination is everywhere. You might have heard of caste system in India. Most people just say Brahmins and Dalits. But its all crap, even within Dalits they practice untouchability and do "we wuz kangz". Then we come to other forms of discrimination, you'll find that people discriminate on so many things, they even hold prejudices inside their family. Ultimately, racism and misogyny are buzzwords, the world is as fair today as it has always been. Today its the whites, yesterday it was the Mediterraneans, before them were Egyptians, and before them were the people from Iraq. This idea that Whites are at totem pole and oppress others is modern fiction. The world keeps changing its kings and with it the nature of discrimination always changes but never goes away
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
extremly low effort and high iq but ok
IMG 20260317 014515
 
  • JFL
Reactions: teddy101
What do you mean by racist ? Usually people say its discrimination on basis of how a person looks, their skin color, their ethnicity, their culture, their physical features. But discrimination is everywhere. You might have heard of caste system in India. Most people just say Brahmins and Dalits. But its all crap, even within Dalits they practice untouchability and do "we wuz kangz". Then we come to other forms of discrimination, you'll find that people discriminate on so many things, they even hold prejudices inside their family. Ultimately, racism and misogyny are buzzwords, the world is as fair today as it has always been. Today its the whites, yesterday it was the Mediterraneans, before them were Egyptians, and before them were the people from Iraq. This idea that Whites are at totem pole and oppress others is modern fiction. The world keeps changing its kings and with it the nature of discrimination always changes but never goes away
inequality is unavoidable the claim that inequality is at the same lvl as it has always been is a extrmely incorrect statment there is obvious improvemnt and the improvment is growing first it was skin color then gender now sexuality and who know what next these are left overs ofc but discrimination isnt built in to the govt as it used to and its decreasing and you logic is wrong cause it like saying crime is unavoidable and everywhere therfore it doesnt exist you are just normalizing it which is extrmely worng
 
  • Woah
Reactions: LXR
inequality is unavoidable the claim that inequality is at the same lvl as it has always been is a extrmely incorrect statment there is obvious improvemnt and the improvment is growing first it was skin color then gender now sexuality and who know what next these are left overs ofc but discrimination isnt built in to the govt as it used to and its decreasing and you logic is wrong cause it like saying crime is unavoidable and everywhere therfore it doesnt exist you are just normalizing it which is extrmely worng
Inequality is based on resources though, and its been the same if not worse than olden times. Look at the difference between a Sub Saharan African and an American. Look at the difference between the middle and upper class today and what it was in 50s-60s or even before. Yes the quality of life has increased drastically but that is not due to falling inequality, rather due to technological adoption across the world. Inequality is relative not objective. Compare your life to that of someone who owns a stake in one of the biggest private banks and the inequality becomes even clearer. Across nations, inequality is as it has always been. The most important technologies are in a select few countries, countable on one hand. You would be wrong if you said Europe, because even within Europe only 2 or 3 countries hold technological edge. Compare that to how behind 2nd world or 3rd world countries are. Crime is more about quality of life than about inequality in my opinion. In America crime has decreased since 90s but inequality has not, at least in terms of assets. Same goes for a lot of OECD countries that reported decrease in crime. Of course one can argue that I live a better life than kings of past, but that is not inequality is it ? I would have to compare my life with someone who holds more wealth than me today, in which case I fall seriously short. Discrimination is cause and symptom of inequality so its been the same its ever been and is going to be, what you are pointing out is change in quality of life across the board, that doesnt negate my point of things being the same. Wealthy people today have the same advantages over you that they did in the past, its just not obvious. You will still be obligated to fight in a war if the State so chooses to. You will be obligated to play as per company rules that put you at a disadvantage but you will because you have no other choice and you wont care anyway because you are conditioned to compare yourself to your own amcestors not your competition. You will succumb to introduction of subscription models and owning things that are deaigned to fail and get replaced. You will play ball with insurance and healthcare however your State wishes. Right now for example European healthcare seems splendid, except look at the outcomes for the rich getting treatment in America at places most people cant afford. Really, you live in a more inequal era than even your grandfather but you wont notice it. These are just some of the examples in which the upper class holds power of commoners.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
NO YOU ARE NOT RACIST



first off lets get this straight

if you actually did the research you would find out that even other ethnic groups find white people more attractive on average and no its not "but saar white ppl pushed this standard up our throat"




attractivness

attractiveness is largely suspected to be caused by three things

high averageness
symmetry
health indicators

and of these the one that is concerned with Eurocentric faces attractiveness is averageness and cause of large media coverage even a nigger in mumbai slumbs seen more attratvie white than indians and connects attractiveness with white



how it actually happened

europeans built and dominated modeling, movies, and mainstream media. when that media spread to african and asian countries a few things happened

1. it was built and introduced with the help and education of europeans
2. ethnic countries adopted european standards instead of building their own
3. even when ethnic media existed nobody watched it because it was low effort and poorly produced so the space got dominated by white faces

the repeated exposure to white faces in media led to them being perceived as the standard of attractiveness worldwide.




the only real competition

the only thing actually contesting white beauty standards right now is K-Pop. and you can clearly see it working. teens across the world are becoming more attracted to east asian men because of it.

yet even then whites are putting more ethnic people into their own media than ethnic groups are doing for themselves.




the point

it is stupid to say eurocentric averageness is seen as more attractive because europeans are inherently superior looking. that is stupid but the fault is ethnics niggers not europeans fault

eurocentric averageness is NOT biologically attractvie dumb racist

and the ones responsible for that are not europeans. europeans did what they had to do and built dominant media. the fault lies with the ethnics themselves for not building their own competing media and representation.

you have to make that distinction we are the problem not whites


that person isn't racist stop calling whites racist cause of preferences



also fuck you idoits that want white fiod but cry "eurocentric beauty standards ruined dating for ethnics" fuck you from the bottom of my heart
make the font size smaller i can almost read it nigga :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
NO YOU ARE NOT RACIST



first off lets get this straight

if you actually did the research you would find out that even other ethnic groups find white people more attractive on average and no its not "but saar white ppl pushed this standard up our throat"




attractivness

attractiveness is largely suspected to be caused by three things

high averageness
symmetry
health indicators

and of these the one that is concerned with Eurocentric faces attractiveness is averageness and cause of large media coverage even a nigger in mumbai slumbs seen more attratvie white than indians and connects attractiveness with white



how it actually happened

europeans built and dominated modeling, movies, and mainstream media. when that media spread to african and asian countries a few things happened

1. it was built and introduced with the help and education of europeans
2. ethnic countries adopted european standards instead of building their own
3. even when ethnic media existed nobody watched it because it was low effort and poorly produced so the space got dominated by white faces

the repeated exposure to white faces in media led to them being perceived as the standard of attractiveness worldwide.




the only real competition

the only thing actually contesting white beauty standards right now is K-Pop. and you can clearly see it working. teens across the world are becoming more attracted to east asian men because of it.

yet even then whites are putting more ethnic people into their own media than ethnic groups are doing for themselves.




the point

it is stupid to say eurocentric averageness is seen as more attractive because europeans are inherently superior looking. that is stupid but the fault is ethnics niggers not europeans fault

eurocentric averageness is NOT biologically attractvie dumb racist

and the ones responsible for that are not europeans. europeans did what they had to do and built dominant media. the fault lies with the ethnics themselves for not building their own competing media and representation.

you have to make that distinction we are the problem not whites


that person isn't racist stop calling whites racist cause of preferences



also fuck you idoits that want white fiod but cry "eurocentric beauty standards ruined dating for ethnics" fuck you from the bottom of my heart
yea come on man no matter how dominant they got in the media no somali is ever outcompeting whites
and the kpop stuff is likely gonna be a small part compared to eurocentric features
having eurocentric features as an ethnic makes you exotic asf, ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
Good points but what’s with the usage of “nigger”

Very distasteful
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
Inequality is based on resources though, and its been the same if not worse than olden times. Look at the difference between a Sub Saharan African and an American. Look at the difference between the middle and upper class today and what it was in 50s-60s or even before. Yes the quality of life has increased drastically but that is not due to falling inequality, rather due to technological adoption across the world. Inequality is relative not objective. Compare your life to that of someone who owns a stake in one of the biggest private banks and the inequality becomes even clearer. Across nations, inequality is as it has always been. The most important technologies are in a select few countries, countable on one hand. You would be wrong if you said Europe, because even within Europe only 2 or 3 countries hold technological edge. Compare that to how behind 2nd world or 3rd world countries are. Crime is more about quality of life than about inequality in my opinion. In America crime has decreased since 90s but inequality has not, at least in terms of assets. Same goes for a lot of OECD countries that reported decrease in crime. Of course one can argue that I live a better life than kings of past, but that is not inequality is it ? I would have to compare my life with someone who holds more wealth than me today, in which case I fall seriously short. Discrimination is cause and symptom of inequality so its been the same its ever been and is going to be, what you are pointing out is change in quality of life across the board, that doesnt negate my point of things being the same. Wealthy people today have the same advantages over you that they did in the past, its just not obvious. You will still be obligated to fight in a war if the State so chooses to. You will be obligated to play as per company rules that put you at a disadvantage but you will because you have no other choice and you wont care anyway because you are conditioned to compare yourself to your own amcestors not your competition. You will succumb to introduction of subscription models and owning things that are deaigned to fail and get replaced. You will play ball with insurance and healthcare however your State wishes. Right now for example European healthcare seems splendid, except look at the outcomes for the rich getting treatment in America at places most people cant afford. Really, you live in a more inequal era than even your grandfather but you wont notice it. These are just some of the examples in which the upper class holds power of commoners.
holy shit you are rigth but the solution isnt denying it but trying to fix it the gap will continue to widden i thougth your point was racial and gender inquality but i 100% agree the rich will keep becoming better in every aspect this shows how important iq and luck is but sitting down and accepting like a good boy is bad the commoner/us should relaisze race gender any other physical trait doesnt matter and if keep arguing with our selves we let the gap be too wide then we are done for we should be closing the gap not sitting down your logic is sound but lettings racism be because of this is way way more harmful and should do the opposite by uniting and resting the powerfull
 
  • +1
Reactions: LXR
yea come on man no matter how dominant they got in the media no somali is ever outcompeting whites
and the kpop stuff is likely gonna be a small part compared to eurocentric features
having eurocentric features as an ethnic makes you exotic asf, ideal
that cause you never saw somali faces during devlopment and besiedes there are attractive somailis you litteraly skipped everything averagness determines which people are attractvie this study shows that other races arent born with the want of eurocentric face https://sci-hub.africa/10.1068/p5601 its just exposure to the media + status nothing else
 
holy shit you are rigth but the solution isnt denying it but trying to fix it the gap will continue to widden i thougth your point was racial and gender inquality but i 100% agree the rich will keep becoming better in every aspect this shows how important iq and luck is but sitting down and accepting like a good boy is bad the commoner/us should relaisze race gender any other physical trait doesnt matter and if keep arguing with our selves we let the gap be too wide then we are done for we should be closing the gap not sitting down your logic is sound but lettings racism be because of this is way way more harmful and should do the opposite by uniting and resting the powerfull
Yeah I agree with you, in fact it would be better for everyone if they wisened up and realised that the upper class is playing everyone against each other. I do think that doing something about it is good. My pessimism is more so from what I've seen happen in my country. You see, in one of the states in my country, people were fed up of intellectuals and rich gatekeeping and holding back the common people. So they joined up and formed a Marxist government. Now during the campaigns, it looked real good, the proletariat coming together and establishing a better state. Instead what happened in reality was that the psychos took over and the movement became a plague. They raped women and then said it was justified because they were "bourgeoisie". There have been plenty of non Marxist uprisings too and each time it leads to the dominant group being replaced but the heirarchy itself remains the same. I dont know but looking at the ever steaming AI race, I am not sure things will get better. But we must fight because that is what we can control
 
  • +1
Reactions: teddy101
yeah that the fucking problem the solution always turns out to be worse than the problem same thing happened in my country the solution would be to find people that actually care about the commonrs even when they get power and ppl like those dont have the balls and the determination to get power
 

Similar threads

EuphoricAsianNormie
Replies
6
Views
123
stonecold trucel
stonecold trucel
P
Replies
16
Views
107
supergoat972
supergoat972
PSLbbc
Replies
26
Views
137
dhusc
dhusc
SwissArms
Replies
13
Views
114
meowingtwentyfour7
meowingtwentyfour7

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top