Islam is the most based thing

[yandex99]

especially salafi.

look at this,hiding a woman's beauty so that we will see her as a actual person,because her body and face doesn't blind us,but we still see the window of her soul.

Then there is nasheeds,this is music straight from jannah



and they are always seeking justice,and putting off the yoke of foreign opressors.

 

[kebab]

muslim women oppressed bro ! They cant have onlyfans bro !!

 

[ReinhardRacist]

Who cares I want a lesbians lips around my white cock

 

[yandex99]

they are always fighting superpowers and destroying them lol

 

[shabby890]

Sufism is the most based

 

[Fiqh]

Sufism is the most based

Sufism is just bid'ah (religious innovation).

Abdullah Ibn. ‘Umar, Allah be pleased with them both, said:

Every bid’ah (religious innovation) is misguidance, even if people think it is good.

[Al-Lālakā’ī in Sharh Usūl I’tiqād Ahl Al-Sunnah wa Al-Jamā’ah Vol 1. P134, no.111]

[Ibn Battah in Al-Ibānah Al-Kubraa Vol.1 p219, no. 213]

Also,

Sufism (التصوف) did not appear until after the first three generations which the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) praised when he said, “The best of mankind is my generation, then those who come after them, then those who come after them…” (narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2652; Muslim, 2533; from the hadeeth of Ibn Mas’ood).

Shaykhul-Islam ibn Taymiyyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

"With regard to the word (الصوفية) (Sufism), it was not known during the first three generations, rather it became known after that." Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 11/5.

 

[yandex99]

sufi is most spiritually based.sufi hanbalis and shafiis are the most based because they also enforce niqab.

 

[shabby890]

Sufism is just bid'ah (religious innovation).

Do you consider Conference of the Birds a major Islamic text even though it's sufi?
It's very beautiful writing

 

[Fiqh]

Do you consider Conference of the Birds a major Islamic text even though it's sufi?
It's very beautiful writing

It's irrelevant

 

[shabby890]

It's irrelevant

Isn't sufism tasawwuff, at its core its about getting closer to Allah through meditation and Spirtuality. Yeah some of their ideas seem kinda wack like Iblis being the only real believer. But in its core its well guided I think

 

[Fiqh]

Isn't sufism tasawwuff, at its core its about getting closer to Allah through meditation and Spirtuality. Yeah some of their ideas seem kinda wack like Iblis being the only real believer.

Irrespective of what Sufism really is, it came after the first three generations that the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) praised.

But in its core its well guided I think

The wise believer agrees with all people in that in which they are in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah and obey Allah and His Messenger, but he does not agree with that in which they go against the Quran and Sunnah and disobey Allah and His Messenger.

(Al-Fatawa, 11/280-290)

Additionally, Sufism isn't like what it used to be. They celebrate the Mawlid of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), their exaggeration about their living shaykhs, and their attachment to shrines and graves, where they pray and circumambulate the graves and make vows to them, and other well-known practices of theirs. Because of these matters, the correct approach now is to warn against them with no reservations.

This is what the Standing Committee said regarding the Sufi tariqas that exist today:

Usually those that are called Sufis nowadays follow bid’ahs (innovations) that constitute shirk, as well as other kinds of bid’ah, such as when some of them say “Madad ya sayyid (Help, O Master)”, and call upon the qutubs (“holy men”), and recite dhikr in unison using names which Allah has not called Himself, like saying “Huw, Huw (He, He)” and “Ah, Ah (a contraction of the word ‘Allah’)”. Whoever reads their books will be aware of many of their innovations that constitute shirk, and other evils.”

Given that Sufism is riddled with innovation and nonsense, and that it came after the first three generations that were praised, it makes no sense to follow it as a Muslim.

 

[shabby890]

Irrespective of what Sufism really is, it came after the first three generations that the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) praised.


The wise believer agrees with all people in that in which they are in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah and obey Allah and His Messenger, but he does not agree with that in which they go against the Quran and Sunnah and disobey Allah and His Messenger.

(Al-Fatawa, 11/280-290)

Additionally, Sufism isn't like what it used to be. They celebrate the Mawlid of the Prophet(peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), their exaggeration about their living shaykhs, and their attachment to shrines and graves, where they pray and circumambulate the graves and make vows to them, and other well-known practices of theirs. Because of these matters, the correct approach now is to warn against them with no reservations.

This is what the Standing Committee said regarding the Sufi tariqas that exist today:



Given that Sufism is riddled with innovation and nonsense, and that it came after the first three generations that were praised, it makes no sense to follow it as a Muslim.

I see. It's just that I find it strange Islamic mysticism doesn't go in hand with Islam like Chrisitan mysticism does. I get it.
Btw is this a good guide for the Quran ( for religious studies)

 

[Fiqh]

I see. It's just that I find it strange Islamic mysticism doesn't go in hand with Islam like Chrisitan mysticism does. I get it.
Btw is this a good guide for the Quran ( for religious studies)
View attachment 2682380

The image is mistaken about what to avoid. I'm not surprised given what they present, with their misguided notion of "Salafi".

The most accurate and well known ones I can recommend are Saheeh International and the translation of Taqiuddeen al-Hilali and Muhsin Khan. A very easy and beginner tafseer (explanation) I can recommend alongside this is the explanation of Shaykh Abdur Rahman Ibn Nasir as-Saadi (Tafseer As-Saadi).

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

islam fundamentalism is a CIA fabrication

 

[shabby890]

The image is mistaken about what to avoid. I'm not surprised given what they present, with their misguided notion of "Salafi".

The most accurate and well known ones I can recommend are Saheeh International and the translation of Taqiuddeen al-Hilali and Muhsin Khan. A very easy and beginner tafseer (explanation) I can recommend alongside this is the explanation of Shaykh Abdur Rahman Ibn Nasir as-Saadi (Tafseer As-Saadi).

Thanks.