Its crazy how high class can vinnie look

just use edited photos taken from the best possible angle theory.
IMG 2126
edited bro:soy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joe Rogancel
@Arborist Ryan Gosling is as recessed as Vinnie, maybe worse. Yet you turned a blind eye to him.
no one's claiming gosling is a chad, he's a mid tier normie that has wide appeal regardless.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Deleted member 21044
Vinnie Hacker is a good looking guy, good jaw good zygos decent fwhr/midface ratio full lips lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
ofcourse.

View attachment 2189038


here's your top percentile mandibular development bro.
arent you a big advocate of averageness?

vinnie might be more downgrown than you, but his mandible doesnt have your crimson chin that destroys all averageness and makes his face uncanny
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pollorex and Deleted member 24789
Looks as downgrown as me jfl
 
no one's claiming gosling is a chad, he's a mid tier normie that has wide appeal regardless.
Vinnie mogs him facially, he just has a " bad body " and not a very masc vibe for women 25+. You will see how he will become in 6 years. He will be a mogger
 
they dont
Of course they do it's a very basic dimorphic trait tied to the y chromosome. Every man has outward gonions like every man has a dick (the sizes differ of course).
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17595
btw @Dr. Bruh and @Arborist , i have studies that show for males 90 degrees GA isnt ideal for appeal as a male, its 110
 
  • +1
Reactions: jflsnowdzz
btw @Dr. Bruh and @Arborist , i have studies that show for males 90 degrees GA isnt ideal for appeal as a male, its 110
no point in explaining to them dr bruh is very low iq, arboist is coping hard
 
btw @Dr. Bruh and @Arborist , i have studies that show for males 90 degrees GA isnt ideal for appeal as a male, its 110
I have a "study" that shows 5'8 is the most attractive height.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 24789
cope harder.

1683466101846

even when he's jutting his jaw forward (notice the lower lip protrusion) he's still clinically recessed and has zero forward growth.

women like him for the same reason they like pugs.
pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-copy-space-pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-160019505.jpg


he is the human equivalent of a dysfunctional dog.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Deleted member 24235, Brootal and 3 others
cope harder.

View attachment 2189051
even when he's jutting his jaw forward (notice the lower lip protrusion) he's still clinically recessed and has zero forward growth.

women like him for the same reason they like pugs.
pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-copy-space-pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-160019505.jpg


he is the human equivalent of a dysfunctional dog.
has to be lifefuel for incels then??? He is clinically recessed and women love him for the same reason they like pugs!!! Everyone on this forum can get 5.6 min followers right of their face alone right??? :bluepill:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468 and Orc
cope harder.

View attachment 2189051
even when he's jutting his jaw forward (notice the lower lip protrusion) he's still clinically recessed and has zero forward growth.

women like him for the same reason they like pugs.
pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-copy-space-pug-dog-closeup-side-view-outdoor-160019505.jpg


he is the human equivalent of a dysfunctional dog.
Si For Ryan it's high class and averageness, but for the other it's ropemaxxing
 
has to be lifefuel for incels then??? He is clinically recessed and women love him for the same reason they like pugs!!! Everyone on this forum can get 5.6 min followers right of their face alone right??? :bluepill:
yes, it is actually.

goes to show it's really not that important as long as you've got some resemblance of harmony and appeal to a niche, but by all means, his jaw development is not good, it looks appealing from some angles, and terrible from others, he's not a 'full package' so to say.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Deleted member 24789
yes, it is actually.

goes to show it's really not that important as long as you've got some resemblance of harmony and appeal to a niche.
you are genuinely stupid as shit or just larping sorry bruh
 
This is an entertaining thread, please keep going
 
  • +1
Reactions: GalacticHero
Si For Ryan it's high class and averageness, but for the other it's ropemaxxing
both have good appeal despite mid tier normies, is my point, they don't even have facial neutrality like most models do, just a combination of good and bad features, and they hide the bad features with angles and light, this is lifefuel if anything.
 
both have good appeal despite mid tier normies, is my point, they don't even have facial neutrality like most models do, just a combination of good and bad features, and they hide the bad features with angles and light, this is lifefuel if anything.
its actually making me angry irl how retarded your takes are i wanna smash my phone into the wall please atop being retarded
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Sanguinius, GalacticHero, Magnum Opus and 1 other person
its actually making me angry irl how retarded your takes are i wanna smash my phone into the wall please atop being retarded
the irony
 
its actually making me angry irl how retarded your takes are i wanna smash my phone into the wall please atop being retarded
my reaction to this information.

20230506 133420
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
show the 5‘8 study btw, i bet it has poor methodology

i will make a thread about GA later

Of course the study is bullshit just like the gonial angle study which compared completely different mandibles of completely different people instead of using a morph with equal characteristics.

90° gonial angle is subconsciously the most attractive since it is evolutionarily the most benefitial - proper development. Its mechanics are optimal for breathing and maximal biting force. Excavated hunter-gatherer skulls had 90° gonial angles. Then came the agricultural revolution and maldevelopment. Anything higher than 90° is technically a morphological defect. People are just ashamed to call it that even tho they do it with animals.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: p0lishsubhuman, Deleted member 27472, Magnum Opus and 3 others

Of course the study is bullshit just like the gonial angle study which compared completely different mandibles of completely different people instead of using a morph with equal characteristics.

90° gonial angle is subconsciously the most attractive since it is evolutionarily the most benefitial - proper development. Its mechanics are optimal for breathing and maximal biting force. Excavated hunter-gatherer skulls had 90° gonial angles. Then came the agricultural revolution and maldevelopment. Anything higher than 90° is technically a physiological defect. People are just ashamed to call it that even tho they do it with animals.
@St.TikTokcel no excuse
 

Of course the study is bullshit just like the gonial angle study which compared completely different mandibles of completely different people instead of using a morph with equal characteristics.

90° gonial angle is subconsciously the most attractive since it is evolutionarily the most benefitial - proper development. Its mechanics are optimal for breathing and maximal biting force. Excavated hunter-gatherer skulls had 90° gonial angles. Then came the agricultural revolution and maldevelopment. Anything higher than 90° is technically a physiological defect. People are just ashamed to call it that even tho they do it with animals.
yea this isnt a study but a stasistic

im gonna read into the studies and see if theyre cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21044

Of course the study is bullshit just like the gonial angle study which compared completely different mandibles of completely different people instead of using a morph with equal characteristics.

90° gonial angle is subconsciously the most attractive since it is evolutionarily the most benefitial - proper development. Its mechanics are optimal for breathing and maximal biting force. Excavated hunter-gatherer skulls had 90° gonial angles. Then came the agricultural revolution and maldevelopment. Anything higher than 90° is technically a morphological defect. People are just ashamed to call it that even tho they do it with animals.
Shit genetics. That's life.
 

Of course the study is bullshit just like the gonial angle study which compared completely different mandibles of completely different people instead of using a morph with equal characteristics.

90° gonial angle is subconsciously the most attractive since it is evolutionarily the most benefitial - proper development. Its mechanics are optimal for breathing and maximal biting force. Excavated hunter-gatherer skulls had 90° gonial angles. Then came the agricultural revolution and maldevelopment. Anything higher than 90° is technically a morphological defect. People are just ashamed to call it that even tho they do it with animals.
Where is ur point then
5'8 is ideal ?

We should all get reverse LL
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
yea this isnt a study but a stasistic
Same principle, what matters is it's cope.
im gonna read into the studies and see if theyre cope
I thought you meant this:


Which is obviously garbage. Comparing johnny depp to some indian with bruxism lol.
 
Same principle, what matters is it's cope.

I thought you meant this:


Which is obviously garbage. Comparing johnny depp to some indian with bruxism lol.
nope theres a lot of difference between mere statistics and a proper empirical study

the link you sent me really is cope tho because its a survey
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
nope theres a lot of difference between mere statistics and a proper empirical study

the link you sent me really is cope tho because its a survey
Only administrative differences. I worked with a "scientist" on a "study" last year and it was litereally just comparing data from two databases about skin cancer. That's how it goes. Having a name with title under it means nothing.
 
Only administrative differences. I worked with a "scientist" on a "study" last year and it was litereally just comparing data from two databases about skin cancer. That's how it goes. Having a name with title under it means nothing.
no lol, statistics are only descriptive while empirical studies look at correlation and regression

but youre right its very important to read how the study was conducted to see if it is worth anything
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
no lol, statistics are only descriptive while empirical studies look at correlation and regression

but youre right its very important to read how the study was conducted to see if it is worth anything
Yea mabye it has to be more complex to be called a "study" instead of "statistics" but the principle is the same.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
Yea mabye it has to be more complex to be called a "study" instead of "statistics" but the principle is the same.
what i mean is that statistics merely describe their findings without looking for reasoning

studies specifically look at correlation between two or more variables
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21044
do you have a sexual attraction in a homosexual way to this wet wipe?
 
do you have a sexual attraction in a homosexual way to this wet wipe?
i have no attractin towards him other than being able to appreciate how objectively he mogs. Also how appealing he is to women since ive been vinniepilled irl many many times. Also admiration
 
H
he is a classical example of a down-grown recessed mouth-breather, his appeal is exclusively a result of niche maxxing with youth halo and his entire fan-base consists out of underage women which leads me to assume you are also underage, the second his hairline recedes his career is over because it hides how disfigured his skull is.

he looks like a recessed subhuman roach next to me, notice how my jaw is a classical example of nose breathing, by the way anglos don't look high class to anyone besides third worlders (americans), all of europe despises them.
have you posted your face on here? Rly curious
 
H

have you posted your face on here? Rly curious
yeah, I have the the opposite issue of what most of the forum struggles with, they have recession, I have abnormal levels of development, literally cursed with neanderthal pheno.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862
yeah, I have the the opposite issue of what most of the forum struggles with, they have recession, I have abnormal levels of development, literally cursed with neanderthal pheno.
Can u show in dms please? I live in place with high concentration of neanderthals so curious lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orc
Can u show in dms please? I live in place with high concentration of neanderthals so curious lol
yeah sure, I'm not shy about my face I just don't share it publicly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862

Similar threads

beautyiswhatwedesir
Replies
17
Views
477
beautyiswhatwedesir
beautyiswhatwedesir
N
Replies
8
Views
681
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
D
Replies
7
Views
668
e65man
e65man
kingedward
Replies
12
Views
254
kingedward
kingedward
cutecoolnerdboy
Replies
128
Views
3K
Liferuiner
Liferuiner

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top