its crazy how the only good looking slavs arent even slavic.

whiteegyptian

whiteegyptian

Black Pilled
Joined
Mar 20, 2025
Posts
9,555
Reputation
16,122
The only Slavs who look good are not even Slavic at all. JFL.

take for example, Chico.

1771527181340
1771527196008


He's Polish, North Pontid phenotype, North Pontid is a mix of Slavshit and Med influences. the only reason Chico looks good is because he's mixed and not predominantly Slavic. BRUTAL.

Take for example this Polish actor.

1771527431068
1771527533826


The only reason he has good coloring and looks somewhat okay relative to other Slavshits, is because he looks Nordic, AGAIN.

Or this random Polish girl (not even a celebrity).

1771527631890
1771527640261


Again, the only reason she's fuckable is because of her Nordic phenotype and appearance.

now let's look at pure bred SLAVSHITS:

1771527686240
1771527726873


Pure bred Slavs, with no Nordic mixed in look dogshit. It's so brutally over for Slavs. only good looking Poles are literally the leftovers of the Germanics.

@ltnbrownacnecel @polonaecel @moggerofhumanity @Former Shortcel @Overlord-
 
  • +1
Reactions: polonaecel, ltnbrownacnecel and .𝐏𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐌𝐀𝐓.
I thought Slavs were moggers?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jimcel
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Hasslejack, ltnbrownacnecel and Jimcel
:forcedsmile:
 

Attachments

  • 5840597_jeremy_meeks_dnrd.mp4
    4.9 MB
1771528069350
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PrettyLights, pfl and Tenres
chico is west alpinid and vasily is tavastid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres
What about a younger Jerermy fragrance ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
Everything. and I definitely do not ignore cephalic index.
"yeah lets ignore science bro"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X16305892
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7527996/
https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/boas-bones-and-race

modern day anthropologists debunked that cranial structure = heritage, meaning that anyone could develope any development.

you keep on saying that your method is "the way" whilst having nothing to back up your claims, its just comical.
 
"yeah lets ignore science bro"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X16305892
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7527996/
https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/boas-bones-and-race

modern day anthropologists debunked that cranial structure = heritage, meaning that anyone could develope any development.

you keep on saying that your method is "the way" whilst having nothing to back up your claims, its just comical.
Like I SAID. all features are developmental regardless. this is where your argument falls.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: anthrocellogy and Former Shortcel
"yeah lets ignore science bro"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X16305892
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7527996/
https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/boas-bones-and-race

modern day anthropologists debunked that cranial structure = heritage, meaning that anyone could develope any development.

you keep on saying that your method is "the way" whilst having nothing to back up your claims, its just comical.
Guarantee you got all your sources from chatgpt
 
  • +1
Reactions: 888mastermind
"yeah lets ignore science bro"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X16305892
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7527996/
https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/boas-bones-and-race

modern day anthropologists debunked that cranial structure = heritage, meaning that anyone could develope any development.

you keep on saying that your method is "the way" whilst having nothing to back up your claims, its just comical.
Stop trying to look smart by sending some studies that you haven't read. I read the first study, it basically says South American skulls are classified into dolichocephalic and brachycephalic for different time groups, but all prehistoric South Americans came from the same ancestral group. but it later found most skulls are actually mesocephalic and not either brachycephalic or dolichocephalic, but you wouldn't know this since you haven't read it at all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
Like I SAID. all features are developmental regardless. this is where your argument falls.
great, your admitting that your way is pseudoscience(y)



take a look at my example.
1771542772608
1771542836033

same cupid bow shape, eyebrow shape, nose shape and ear shape

this works with any person, just take a celeb and align those features.
theres no studies about the specifics we look at as far as i know.


Stop trying to look smart by sending some studies that you haven't read. I read the first study, it basically says South American skulls are classified into dolichocephalic and brachycephalic for different time groups, but all prehistoric South Americans came from the same ancestral group. but it later found most skulls are actually mesocephalic and not either brachycephalic or dolichocephalic, but you wouldn't know this since you haven't read it at all.
with sum thinkin you might be able to think about how the pictures you see on humanphenotypes.net are based of the precolonial time which could suggest that the physical traits section is slightly outdated.
 
great, your admitting that your way is pseudoscience(y)



take a look at my example.
View attachment 4676192 View attachment 4676198
same cupid bow shape, eyebrow shape, nose shape and ear shape

this works with any person, just take a celeb and align those features.
theres no studies about the specifics we look at as far as i know.



with sum thinkin you might be able to think about how the pictures you see on humanphenotypes.net are based of the precolonial time which could suggest that the physical traits section is slightly outdated.
Proceeds to post 2 men without clarifying his point whatsoever. fucking IQLET. and you don't seem like a native English speaker, are you raging out while speaking out with me? relax and type slower, son.
 
you aint real
View attachment 4676262
i only have to state that to make my arguement since the cranial structure one got debunked ages ago and you are aware of it.


i speak 3 languages.
u live in the balkans so keep quiet:ROFLMAO:



im mid game
hello saar let me post a pic of elon musk that will totally destroy all op arguments saar!!!!
 
Every good "slavic" pheno is blue eye blonde hair over 6 feet. They look almost nordic.

Meanwhile 80-90% are like dark hair midgets in track suits sipping a 50oz of home mad vodak.
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl and whiteegyptian
Every good "slavic" pheno is blue eye blonde hair over 6 feet. They look almost nordic.

Meanwhile 80-90% are like dark hair midgets in track suits sipping a 50oz of home mad vodak.
Those aren't Slavs. those are leftover Germanics. and you are right. the average Slav looks swarthy as fuck.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Firstname.Lastname
elaborate
Poland was founded by a Dane. and the entire Polish north was settled by North Germans who built cities like Danzig (renamed now). the Polish north was basically Germanic, until the Soviets kicked 90% of them out. but obviously a good chunk of them were Polonized and just assimilated.
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
Those aren't Slavs. those are leftover Germanics. and you are right. the average Slav looks swarthy as fuck.
Kinda my point, but they get called slav anyways and forsure have some infection in there genom like the fingolions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian
cherry picking?
 

Similar threads

888mastermind
Replies
5
Views
99
User28823
User28823
888mastermind
Replies
96
Views
899
hopecel
hopecel
whiteegyptian
Replies
37
Views
251
mr007
mr007

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top