JB vids compliaton PART 2 WATCH FULL SCREEN

i cant answer that question because i did not make this thread. i dont know why OP put that pic of the 10 year olds in his OP. i suspect he looked up young girls and just picked some pretty faces, and these 10 year old twins ended up on his list, despite the majority of his list being 13-17
Man I don't have a link but I could've sworn you posted a prepubescent gymnastics girl here before. And OP is clearly a pedophile just look at his Avi and him sliding in the prepubescent girls in the vid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecaste
Man I don't have a link but I could've sworn you posted a prepubescent gymnastics girl here before. And OP is clearly a pedophile just look at his Avi and him sliding in the prepubescent girls in the vid.
i dont think i did

and I dont think OP is pedo. I suppose you might disagree with me though. I just think OP likes hebe/ephebo girls and he saw some pretty faces and liked them too

at the end of the day, is it really that big of a deal if he put in the faces of some 10 year olds into his vid?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
why? im serious. i genuinely dont undertand how a picture (non pornographic) that is posted in a vid is harmful.
Like I said before, why would anyone incarcerate themselves? If it was allowed your next excuse would be "but bro her body is aesthetic let me appreciate"
 
Like I said before, why would anyone incarcerate themselves? If it was allowed your next excuse would be "but bro her body is aesthetic let me appreciate"
im confused. what the fuck are you talking about? i dnt see the connection? ho is incarcerating themselves?
 
im confused. what the fuck are you talking about? i dnt see the connection? ho is incarcerating themselves?
Ur word play is boring asf to deal with, you clearly know what I meant by what I said.
 
no i really dont.
I'm saying it's pointless to entertain "but it's not harmful if it's not nudity" because who in the right mind, including pedophiles, would post child porn on a public domain?
 
I'm saying it's pointless to entertain "but it's not harmful if it's not nudity" because who in the right mind, including pedophiles, would post child porn on a public domain?
woah

the post did not feature child porn

the post was two CLOTHED young girls
 
I'm saying it's pointless to entertain "but it's not harmful if it's not nudity" because who in the right mind, including pedophiles, would post child porn on a public domain?
why would you mention posting CP then?
 
jfl how degenerate kys
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheEndHasNoEnd
i said people dont post it
Ya and I said it would be stupid because they would risk getting jailtime.
explain why posting a pic of pretty faced clothed 10 year olds is wrong
First off fucking crazy that you can say that with a straight face
Secondly if there is no sort of attraction to those girls, then why stop there? Why not continue to boys? If it's clearly an aesthetics appreciation like child modelling agencies then it wouldn't stop at one gender would it? If you post a 10 year old girl, there is a clear intention behind it. Why the fuck, in the first place, even post those prepub girls in a place where appreciation of aesthetics is mostly reserved to male models, and the appreciation of sexual attraction is reserved to sexually mature hot girls?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecaste
First off fucking crazy that you can say that with a straight face
Secondly if there is no sort of attraction to those girls, then why stop there? Why not continue to boys? If it's clearly an aesthetics appreciation like child modelling agencies then it wouldn't stop at one gender would it? If you post a 10 year old girl, there is a clear intention behind it. Why the fuck, in the first place, even post those prepub girls in a place where appreciation of aesthetics is mostly reserved to male models, and the appreciation of sexual attraction is reserved to sexually mature hot girls?
1610210692803


thinking a face is pretty =/= sexual attraction

@Edmund_Kemper
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7313
Ya and I said it would be stupid because they would risk getting jailtime.

First off fucking crazy that you can say that with a straight face
Secondly if there is no sort of attraction to those girls, then why stop there? Why not continue to boys? If it's clearly an aesthetics appreciation like child modelling agencies then it wouldn't stop at one gender would it? If you post a 10 year old girl, there is a clear intention behind it. Why the fuck, in the first place, even post those prepub girls in a place where appreciation of aesthetics is mostly reserved to male models, and the appreciation of sexual attraction is reserved to sexually mature hot girls?
Very well explained. @personalityinkwell you make a fool of yourself. Just stop arguing, you are a degenerate with no morals whatsoever.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TheEndHasNoEnd
Very well explained. @personalityinkwell you make a fool of yourself. Just stop arguing, you are a degenerate with no morals whatsoever.
define morals you stupid fuck.

if someone doesnt pursue, what is immoral?
 
View attachment 919739

thinking a face is pretty =/= sexual attraction

@Edmund_Kemper
Bro there's many pretty faces in all age groups and genders, even in those 25+ girls you despise so much. Why not post them more? It's clear the only reason why you (yes you did post that prepub girl vid don't act clueless) and your pedo clique post these prepub girls is to jack off to them. And also stop tagging innocent teens who are attracted to jbs and older, they have a future unlike you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecaste
@thecaste @TheEndHasNoEnd is such trolls :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: :lul: dont use the word pedophilia if u not know what it means
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6695, thecaste and Deleted member 4612
I'm talking about the gymnastics girl, again don't act dumb dude I've seen it.
please link me to here i posted 8 year olds

im serious. i never did this
 
I told you I don't know how to find it, I think it's an older post of yours
isaw a pos of yours saying you wan to marry a 4 year old. i just cant find it nigger
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TheEndHasNoEnd
isaw a pos of yours saying you wan to marry a 4 year old. i just cant find it nigger
It was an instagram video, maybe it got taken down idk. But you did say that one example of a 5 year old who was able to give birth is perfectly fine to have sex with because she can give birth like lol.
 
It was an instagram video, maybe it got taken down idk. But you did say that one example of a 5 year old who was able to give birth is perfectly fine to have sex with because she can give birth like lol.
lmao

that was @ImprovLoser . he did indeed make that argument. i dont agree with him btw
 
What separates you not liking 5 year olds and you liking 14 year olds (just answer, don't make any assumptions yet)
developemnt

a 14 year old girl has finished puberty (or close to finished)

a 5 year old hasnt even started
 
So fucking based and wow!
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 7313
developemnt

a 14 year old girl has finished puberty (or close to finished)

a 5 year old hasnt even started
Would you consider a girl at peak fertility to be the most developed?
 
.
 
Last edited:
who cares if it is? why should women necessarily start reproducing at peak fertility and not before it?
Better genes, and not only that, what would separate a prepubescent girl from teenage one if you're willing to separate a teenage one from an adult? Prepubescents still have estrogen, and let's face it, there's no way ur gonna be able to reproduce with even a late teen at this day and age, hence my questions have been personal rather than theoretical. So, if you aren't going to reproduce either way, what separates a prepub from pub for u?
 
Last edited:
let's face it, there's no way ur gonna be able to reproduce with even a late teen at this day and age, hence my questions have been personal rather than theoretical. So, if you aren't going to reproduce either way, what separates a prepub from pub for u?
well you are right, i aint gonna mate with either

however i feel attraction towards pubescents and not towards prepubescents
 
well you are right, i aint gonna mate with either

however i feel attraction towards pubescents and not towards prepubescents
But why not more towards adults since you like pubescents compared to pre due to development. You know hip size increases linearly with age, and I believe boob size stops growing at 18. Collagen also peaks at early 20s.
 
But why not more towards adults since you like pubescents compared to pre due to development. You know hip size increases linearly with age, and I believe boob size stops growing at 18. Collagen also peaks at early 20s.
Would you say you physically prefer the fully fertile woman yet mentally prefer the pubescent?
 
Would you say you physically prefer the fully fertile woman yet mentally prefer the pubescent?
tough to describe but this may be true

i think 14-17 is prime age
 

Similar threads

theonewhorisesabove
Replies
16
Views
282
Docc
Docc
D
Replies
67
Views
1K
Fraud.san
Fraud.san
bigmaxingboss
Replies
19
Views
391
Faker78611
Faker78611
vidit
Replies
102
Views
2K
obscuredusk
obscuredusk

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top