6ft4
Every Spectrum has a Purgatory Zone
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,971
- Reputation
- 25,606
It's fine to come here to ask for rating if you haven't yet done much looksmaxxing and you haven't received much attention from women as it can help guide you on how you need to improve and give you a dose of reality or a boost in confidence depending on the feedback but hanging onto your looks rating as part of your identity so that you can say you mog x amount of men isn't ideal because you are still conceding that 10% of men mog you if you settle on the belief that you are 90th percentile.
Once your looks have reached what you consider to be their final form post looksmaxxing, there is really no point in mentally referring to yourself as a HTN for example to reassure yourself that it means you mog x amount of men because as soon as a Chadlite comes along you then have to concede that he mogs you simply for existing within the framework that you derive your value from.
Rather than fixating on your looks rating at this point, it is better to think of what combination of traits you possess that nobody else possesses hence nobody can compete with you in that regard because you are 1 of 1.
I am coming to believe that looking at mogger traits in a comparative sense is way more important when it comes to men judging and earning respect from other men than it is for women selecting men.
Since men care about mogging in "superficial" aspects like height, face, muscle, lifestyle, money etc, when they are in the proximity of a guy who mogs in these traits, they recognize his value because they are striving towards being in his position.
A guy may believe he would be more content if he was a couple of inches taller, thus when he sees a heightmogger he can pay his respects to him because he sees that he has a trait he'd like to have.
Women don't operate within the same framework however, when they see a heightmogger they can't appreciate what a marvel he is because he doesn't have a trait that she craves to possess for herself.
All of these mogger traits are just abstract ideas to women because they aren't in a position where they are striving towards these traits thus they can't actually appreciate them, also women are incapable of abstract thought.
What are the main mogger traits that women can appreciate because they desire to possess for themselves?
Face is the primary one but notice women admire pretty boys like Damian Kater because they have traits they desire / are striving towards themselves.
Foids will show appreciation for Kater the same way they can appreciate a woman because he has an anteface, forward growth, full lips and an upturned nose while being cleanshaven which are traits that women wish they had.
Now if those foids look at someone like Chris Hemsworth, yes they can show lust towards him but his face again returns to just being an abstract thing for women like height or muscle because he has a masc face and facial hair.
This goes quite some way towards explaining why foids are often the harder pursuers of males than visa versa they're in the age range where their male peers have peak boyish looks, women can still appreciate them because they haven't become masculine enough to become an abstraction that no longer have traits they strive towards themselves.
Women are obsessed with guys like DiCaprio due to his averaged facial ratios which they want to have themselves, women dont want 30:30:40 facial thirds themselves thus TFBEMs are an abstraction.
The other mogger trait that women can appreciate is status because women are obsessed with attaining status thus they want a man who has status.
Why did I go on that long tangent?
Because becoming objectively better looking from looksmaxxing isn't guaranteed to have a 1:1 increase in results with women once you're passed a certain threshold because women just pick guys they like based on arbitrary tastes they have and trying to make yourself a girls preference by mogging the guy she likes in every superficial metric means nothing to her whereas every guy will be able to recognize you mog the guy she likes.
Women just pick whatever they feel like fucking on a whim whether it be a mogger or subhuman, so why constrict yourself to a box where you feel like you are destined to get better results with women than 90% of men but worse results than 10% of men based on your looks then flip out when you realize 40th percentile guys are outslaying you.
I wish women actually held men to a standard of needing to be 6'+ HTN+ for any women on earth to open their legs because it would mean you're only competing with a tiny percentage of men for sex but unfortunately we are in competition with and losing out to subhumans so why would you value your worth on your objective looks rating when your objective looks rating only matters to the male brain.
Sure it's good to know where you stand from the perspective of other men because we base our hierarchies in reality but women don't.
Women can view utter genetic garbage as being the top of the hierarchy if enough women come to that consensus so why would we even think our objective looks rating should matter to them.
When you are dealing with foids you should believe you are the best possible man in the world she could fuck, not out of disrespect for other men by devaluing guys who objectively mog you, but out of a LACK OF RESPECT for women's ability to rate men's value because it's likely that most women will at some stage in their life consider a subhuman to be the guy who she is most attracted to in the world at that particular moment.
If you don't believe you can be the most attractive man in the world to any girl at any particular moment, you are giving women TOO MUCH RESPECT which they do not deserve.
Brutal it was a year already since I first had these thoughts but haven't yet broken from of labelling myself as a HTN facially with Chadlite SMV due to body size
looksmax.org
Once your looks have reached what you consider to be their final form post looksmaxxing, there is really no point in mentally referring to yourself as a HTN for example to reassure yourself that it means you mog x amount of men because as soon as a Chadlite comes along you then have to concede that he mogs you simply for existing within the framework that you derive your value from.
Rather than fixating on your looks rating at this point, it is better to think of what combination of traits you possess that nobody else possesses hence nobody can compete with you in that regard because you are 1 of 1.
I am coming to believe that looking at mogger traits in a comparative sense is way more important when it comes to men judging and earning respect from other men than it is for women selecting men.
Since men care about mogging in "superficial" aspects like height, face, muscle, lifestyle, money etc, when they are in the proximity of a guy who mogs in these traits, they recognize his value because they are striving towards being in his position.
A guy may believe he would be more content if he was a couple of inches taller, thus when he sees a heightmogger he can pay his respects to him because he sees that he has a trait he'd like to have.
Women don't operate within the same framework however, when they see a heightmogger they can't appreciate what a marvel he is because he doesn't have a trait that she craves to possess for herself.
All of these mogger traits are just abstract ideas to women because they aren't in a position where they are striving towards these traits thus they can't actually appreciate them, also women are incapable of abstract thought.
What are the main mogger traits that women can appreciate because they desire to possess for themselves?
Face is the primary one but notice women admire pretty boys like Damian Kater because they have traits they desire / are striving towards themselves.
Foids will show appreciation for Kater the same way they can appreciate a woman because he has an anteface, forward growth, full lips and an upturned nose while being cleanshaven which are traits that women wish they had.
Now if those foids look at someone like Chris Hemsworth, yes they can show lust towards him but his face again returns to just being an abstract thing for women like height or muscle because he has a masc face and facial hair.
This goes quite some way towards explaining why foids are often the harder pursuers of males than visa versa they're in the age range where their male peers have peak boyish looks, women can still appreciate them because they haven't become masculine enough to become an abstraction that no longer have traits they strive towards themselves.
Women are obsessed with guys like DiCaprio due to his averaged facial ratios which they want to have themselves, women dont want 30:30:40 facial thirds themselves thus TFBEMs are an abstraction.
The other mogger trait that women can appreciate is status because women are obsessed with attaining status thus they want a man who has status.
Why did I go on that long tangent?
Because becoming objectively better looking from looksmaxxing isn't guaranteed to have a 1:1 increase in results with women once you're passed a certain threshold because women just pick guys they like based on arbitrary tastes they have and trying to make yourself a girls preference by mogging the guy she likes in every superficial metric means nothing to her whereas every guy will be able to recognize you mog the guy she likes.
Women just pick whatever they feel like fucking on a whim whether it be a mogger or subhuman, so why constrict yourself to a box where you feel like you are destined to get better results with women than 90% of men but worse results than 10% of men based on your looks then flip out when you realize 40th percentile guys are outslaying you.
I wish women actually held men to a standard of needing to be 6'+ HTN+ for any women on earth to open their legs because it would mean you're only competing with a tiny percentage of men for sex but unfortunately we are in competition with and losing out to subhumans so why would you value your worth on your objective looks rating when your objective looks rating only matters to the male brain.
Sure it's good to know where you stand from the perspective of other men because we base our hierarchies in reality but women don't.
Women can view utter genetic garbage as being the top of the hierarchy if enough women come to that consensus so why would we even think our objective looks rating should matter to them.
When you are dealing with foids you should believe you are the best possible man in the world she could fuck, not out of disrespect for other men by devaluing guys who objectively mog you, but out of a LACK OF RESPECT for women's ability to rate men's value because it's likely that most women will at some stage in their life consider a subhuman to be the guy who she is most attracted to in the world at that particular moment.
If you don't believe you can be the most attractive man in the world to any girl at any particular moment, you are giving women TOO MUCH RESPECT which they do not deserve.
Brutal it was a year already since I first had these thoughts but haven't yet broken from of labelling myself as a HTN facially with Chadlite SMV due to body size
The time for being realistic is over, irrational levels of delusion will be undertaken to induce a false sense of social magnetism
I've always been one champion the observation of reality I've always admitted exactly where I lay on the bellcurve I just so happen to be in the upper percentiles of several physical metrics but I've also admitted these metrics dont count for much when I'm handicapped by my inability to relate...
looksmax.org
Last edited:
