Lefort 2 + CCW jaw rotation

Why lefort 2?, not many perform it unless giant implant, i would reccomend you to get infra implants or fat grafts for the upper maxilla
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Clark and N1666
LF 2 moggs it is 35k with Celal ( including bimax and plates )
 
Why lefort 2?, not many perform it unless giant implant, i would reccomend you to get infra implants or fat grafts for the upper maxilla
You are a fucking idiot everything you’ve just said is wrong.
 
  • +1
Reactions: oily703
You are a fucking idiot everything you’ve just said is wrong.
Yeah sure, only surgeon who performs it is celal in turkey, almost no other surgeon will perform it on you unless top tier deformity.
 
Yeah sure, only surgeon who performs it is celal in turkey, almost no other surgeon will perform it on you unless top tier deformity.
Hes talking about what you sugested you utter fucking retard
Fat grafts jfl:feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: N1666
Yeah sure, only surgeon who performs it is celal in turkey, almost no other surgeon will perform it on you unless top tier deformity.
Pagnoni does it too but for 70-80k per a user here who asked him in 2022
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Pagnoni does it too but for 70-80k per a user here who asked him in 2022
Really? It's interesting we don't hear about any results - even with that price tag - considering how widely promoted Pagnoni is in this forum and that LF2/3 is presented as the El Dorado of surgeries. I've seen LF2 results online - it's definitely not the silver bullet everyone thinks it is.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: moze and Clark
Why lefort 2?, not many perform it unless giant implant, i would reccomend you to get infra implants or fat grafts for the upper maxilla
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: blinemaxxer, Acne Victim, Clark and 1 other person
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
There is also an implant for the nasal bone, but i saw it only at Eppley so i am not sure if other surgeons do it.
 
There is also an implant for the nasal bone, but i saw it only at Eppley so i am not sure if other surgeons do it.
You can also get a rhinoplasty which augments the nose bridge, I think. The danger with surgeries is how quickly it becomes a rabbit hole. More surgeries = more chance of a botch. That's not an anti-surgery argument. It's just that people have unrealistic expectations about what surgery can achieve. You can achieve some degree of improvement but it's no silver bullet in the vast majority of cases sadly - at least if your entire maxilla is recessed.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Clark and Lefor3Laser
You can also get a rhinoplasty which augments the nose bridge, I think. The danger with surgeries is how quickly it becomes a rabbit hole. More surgeries = more chance of a botch. That's not an anti-surgery argument. It's just that people have unrealistic expectations about what surgery can achieve. You can achieve some degree of improvement but it's no silver bullet in the vast majority of cases sadly - at least if your maxillary complex is recessed.
Indeed, as i said, i saw many giant implant results wich were underwhelming or uncanny, sadly not even implants feel right sometimes, big movements/implants = more uncanny looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Snicket
Indeed, as i said, i saw many giant implant results wich were underwhelming or uncanny, sadly not even implants feel right sometimes, big movements/implants = more uncanny looks.
Totally agreed. One guy who had his entire maxilla covered in implants looked like MJ. I'm not even anti-implants but they should augment the existing, albeit flawed, structure instead of almost trying to replace the entire facial skeleton! Tom Cruise had incredibly natural jaw implants in his early 20s and they looked great.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clark and Lefor3Laser
4538372 1732906420449

Totally agreed. One guy who had his entire maxilla covered in implants looked like MJ. I'm not even anti-implants but they should augment the existing, albeit flawed, structure instead of almost trying to replace the entire facial skeleton! Tom Cruise had incredibly natural jaw implants in his early 20s and they looked great.
You are absolutely right, this is a result i saw from giant, many might say that he looks better than his before, but looking ugly but natural will always be better than pretty and uncanny.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FrenchareMedCucks and Snicket
View attachment 3433044

You are absolutely right, this is a result i saw from giant, many might say that he looks better than his before, but looking ugly but natural will always be better than pretty and uncanny.
Yep. Seen many cases like this. The facial contour looks totally unnatural. Accepting some measure of improvement and knowing when to walk away is key.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
Are there any concerns about the CCW jaw rotation tho? Will it actually look good? I’m definitely doing CCW rotation, but I’m considering Lefort because someone told me it’s cheaper when done with CCW rotation.
 
View attachment 3433044

You are absolutely right, this is a result i saw from giant, many might say that he looks better than his before, but looking ugly but natural will always be better than pretty and uncanny.
I don’t even consider that uncanny tbh, dude looks good asf
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: FrenchareMedCucks and Lefor3Laser
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
The people who talk about lf2/3 like that are usually teenagers who think it’s edgy to be getting extremely invasive procedures. LF2 specially has a shit roi imo
 
Are there any concerns about the CCW jaw rotation tho? Will it actually look good? I’m definitely doing CCW rotation, but I’m considering Lefort because someone told me it’s cheaper when done with CCW rotation.
It's an interesting point. We know the nature of rotation changes when you mobilise more of the maxilla. In a lot of the medical literature I've read, LF2/3 is done first and then orthognathic surgery is done separately to get the optimal occlusal plane and bite. In some other cases, the surgeon mobilises different parts of the maxilla simultaneously. E.g. LF1 + naso-maxillary region + orbits and cheekbones. It's super specialised though. Only a tiny subset of surgeons do this apparently.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Clark
The people who talk about lf2/3 like that are usually teenagers who think it’s edgy to be getting extremely invasive procedures. LF2 specially has a shit roi imo
I think so. And the roi is terrible for surgeons as well. The risks inherent in LF2/3 are much higher to the extent that the financial return doesn't seem worth it. The procedure no doubt takes a huge amount of planning too. If I were a surgeon, I'd just squeeze out more bimax operations instead. 3 LF1s probably brings in more money than 1 LF2. And imagine getting sued for a botched LF2/3. It could ruin your entire professional reputation. That's why even many capable surgeons who could perform this surgery outright refuse to imo.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Acne Victim
I think so. And the roi is terrible for surgeons as well. The risks inherent in LF2/3 are much higher to the extent that the financial return doesn't seem worth it. The procedure no doubt takes a huge amount of planning too. If I were a surgeon, I'd just squeeze out more bimax operations instead. 3 LF1s probably brings in more money than 1 LF2. And imagine getting sued for a botched LF2/3. It could ruin your entire professional reputation. That's why even many capable surgeons who could perform this surgery outright refuse too.
Celal want western Incel to ascend , guy is low inihb and don't care about risky surgery, we should praise him more here.
 
I think so. And the roi is terrible for surgeons as well. The risks inherent in LF2/3 are much higher to the extent that the financial return doesn't seem worth it. The procedure no doubt takes a huge amount of planning too. If I were a surgeon, I'd just squeeze out more bimax operations instead. 3 LF1s probably brings in more money than 1 LF2. And imagine getting sued for a botched LF2/3. It could ruin your entire professional reputation. That's why even many capable surgeons who could perform this surgery outright refuse too.
you’re absolutely right. the ROI just isn’t there for surgeons too. I can’t say too much here but these procedures, just like any other surgery, almost never go perfectly. But one thing is not going perfectly with a set of implants, and another is with a lefort 3 CCW lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Celal want western Incel to ascend , guy is low inihb and don't care about risky surgery, we should praise him more here.
Celal wants your money. A good surgeon doesn't ignore risks; he tries to address and mitigate them.
LF2/3 isn't a silver bullet. It comes with a bunch of aesthetic trade-offs that probably need other surgeries to address them based on what I've seen.
 
Last edited:
No offence to him, but he could have gone to more natural looks and still get better looking.
true but if his goals are to get laid, then idk if its such a bad decision. i can speak from experience that its kinda irrelevant to look slightly uncanny like him, specially as irl it will be more natural
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
With projection rhinoplasties and implants, LF2 is obsolete beyond syndromic cases
 
View attachment 3433044

You are absolutely right, this is a result i saw from giant, many might say that he looks better than his before, but looking ugly but natural will always be better than pretty and uncanny.
Looks too much
But he asked for it himself and the designer did a good job with his request
It still leaves the question does everyone know what they're asking for when they ask for it
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say yes
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Lefor3Laser
Was it custom wraparound or jaw angle implants?

Looks good though
 
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
Agree on everything except making eye and midface more compact.it is possible to make midface more compact with lf3 and i ve seen cases where they fixed sunken eyes
 
The issue is that the nasal cavity is left behind. Implants and fat grafts are the realistic solution. Unfortunately, there is no optimal surgery for a recessed maxilla. Even LF2/3 don't make the midface more compact. There's concerns of sunken eyes (enophthalmos ), a larger nose, complications relating to facial nerves, moving the medial canthus. Rotation is also more limited. It's a very serious and invasive operation and yet people talk about here like ordering a happy meal.
Agree on everything except making eye and midface more compact.it is possible to make midface more compact with lf3 and i ve seen cases where they fixed sunken eyes
 
I know many people will disagree but in my opinion to have a natural and aesthetically pleasing change on the uppermaxilla there should be a domino effect ie applying continuous pressure on the maxilla by adult facepuller can change the bones which conmect to the maxilla.when the maxilla is expanded to a certain degree the suture of bones including the sphenoid bone will loosen which allows for a good protraction of the maxilla.in theory it can work if we have a good device for adults.
 
I know many people will disagree but in my opinion to have a natural and aesthetically pleasing change on the uppermaxilla there should be a domino effect ie applying continuous pressure on the maxilla by adult facepuller can change the bones which conmect to the maxilla.when the maxilla is expanded to a certain degree the suture of bones including the sphenoid bone will loosen which allows for a good protraction of the maxilla.in theory it can work if we have a good device for adults.
This is already done with MSE - which is meant to split the sutures of the maxilla - and then used in combination with the facemask to advance the maxilla in adults.

I haven't seen evidence that any meaningful advancement can be achieved in adults or even teenagers.

The issue is that the maxilla is almost completely developed by the age of 11.

Facemasks are optimal around age 5 or 6 when the maxilla is still growing and long before the sutures start closing. One study claimed that past the age of 10, no protraction of the maxilla was even achieved in teenagers using facemasks vs their control group.

Adults would have to wear facemasks 12 hours day for a year to get maybe a measly milimetre. Even if you were right, the best candidates for this treatment would be class 3s with prognathic mandibles. Anyone else would almost definitely get an overbite.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

maxx151151
Replies
4
Views
192
normie_joe
normie_joe
qazw
Replies
3
Views
54
TheoRaven
T
N
Replies
4
Views
64
NepoCel
N
Clark
Replies
3
Views
119
ducksoover
D
W
Replies
11
Views
193
whitepill_is_true
W

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top