let’s see if you are low iq - philosophical question that has an objective answer 🙌

[ascensionneeeded]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

 

[Sub5kang]

This is obviously alluding to religion, I wouldn't but I'm not God for he knows best how about that

 

[AressGymMaxx]

Yeah they only deserve the suffering they caused like an equal trade of suffering

 

[hotrodduncan]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

something something finite sins doesnt justify infinite suffering

 

[afroheadluke]

the question

 

[Sub5kang]

Yeah they only deserve the suffering they caused like an equal trade of suffering

The guy who dropped fat man and little boy would be in deep shit

 

[Cessation]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

Eternal suffering doesn’t exist and if it did I wouldn’t.

 

[AressGymMaxx]

The guy who dropped fat man and little boy would be in deep shit

Very deep shit

 

[Sub5kang]

You're alive Luke? I haven't seen you on tiktok in a while

 

[ascensionneeeded]

This is obviously alluding to religion, I wouldn't but I'm not God for he knows best how about that

no one deserves infinite suffering, no matter if god is handing it out.

eternal suffering isn’t imaginable. imagine being stuck in a box for 9999999999999999 years and then multiply that by 9999999999

it’s unimaginable. no one deserves that

 

[ascensionneeeded]

Eternal suffering doesn’t exist and if it did I wouldn’t.

so you don’t believe in god?

 

[silently_said]

Your premise is flawed because it assumes Hitler did bad things

 

[Acquiescence]

But muh bronze age ethics bro!

 

[slaters]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

By giving this question an objective answer proves you yourself low is iq

You could make the claim that no one deserves infinite suffering

You could also making the claim that if you made millions of people suffer BY CHOICE they deserve infinite suffering

Your example doesn’t count though because it was Jews

 

[Sub5kang]

no one deserves infinite suffering, no matter if god is handing it out.

eternal suffering isn’t imaginable. imagine being stuck in a box for 9999999999999999 years and then multiply that by 9999999999

it’s unimaginable. no one deserves that

Well it is kinda an "I told you so" gotcha moment, since you know about it and choose not follow it arrogantly turning your nose up at your creator who moulded you he will do as he sees fit, he dictates morals since he created it and as you don't believe in it you shouldn't care

 

[Cessation]

so you don’t believe in god?

No

 

[_MVP_]

Rokos Basilisk dont care

 

[ascensionneeeded]

By giving this question an objective answer proves you yourself low is iq

You could make the claim that no one deserves infinite suffering

You could also making the claim that if you made millions of people suffer BY CHOICE they deserve infinite suffering

Your example doesn’t count though because it was Jews

i was just saying that there is an objective answer and if you disagree with the objective answer then you are wrong and low iq for disagreeing

 

[ascensionneeeded]

No

based

 

[Petsmart]

The dude burning in hell 4 quadrillion years later cause he didn’t believe in god for 80 years

 

[eyewideshut]

The only answer here is what are we leaning towards, retributivism, consequentialism, humanist?

I lean towards absurdism personally, and i think eternal punishment assumes a just that doesn't exist. There's no grand judge, so the question itself is dim.

 

[Mizi44]

above equal suffering

 

[kazama]

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

Who dictates what is non atrocious thing or atrocious thing? Our rules r only to keep our species in harmony and constant reproduction (despite certain pointless wars)
So in the end, I see no reason to throw her into eternal suffering. Prisons and death penalties r a way for a person to pay for their mistake and be excluded from society cuz they r no longer fit
Other than that there is no logical reason, ofc I am excluding divine beings etc...

 

[1blamedrako]

I wouldn’t send anyone to an infinite punishment no matter the crime. Infinite is too long of a time
Imagine in 50 000 000 years and they would still be in punishment no matter how much they atone for their sins

 

[eyewideshut]

Who dictates what is non atrocious thing or atrocious thing? Our rules r only to keep our species in harmony and constant reproduction (despite certain pointless wars)
So in the end, I see no reason to throw her into eternal suffering. Prisons and death penalties r a way for a person to pay for their mistake and be excluded from society cuz they r no longer fit
Other than that there is no logical reason, ofc I am excluding divine beings etc...

Mirin, absurdism and humanist mix, prison talk is more pragmatic though.

There’s no objective answer to this philosophically, because different views of objectivity exist and none are truly universal.

 

[ascensionneeeded]

The dude burning in hell 4 quadrillion years later cause he didn’t believe in god for 80 years

View attachment 4188624

all loving god will send you to eternal suffering because you chose the wrong religion (you made a decision that was perfectly reasonable based on the evidence / lack of evidence you had access to. in the end you got unlucky and you’ll spend the next quadrillion years burning, despite just being a good, yet unlucky person)

 

[ascensionneeeded]

I wouldn’t send anyone to an infinite punishment no matter the crime. Infinite is too long of a time
Imagine in 50 000 000 years and they would still be in punishment no matter how much they atone for their sins

exactly.

how tf can people not understand this

 

[1blamedrako]

exactly.

how tf can people not understand this

Low iq people or psychopaths

 

[caleb555]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

I strongly agree with this

 

[1blamedrako]

If you were to send someone to an endless suffering you would be far worse than the criminal

 

[ascensionneeeded]

Well it is kinda an "I told you so" gotcha moment, since you know about it and choose not follow it arrogantly turning your nose up at your creator who moulded you he will do as he sees fit, he dictates morals since he created it and as you don't believe in it you shouldn't care

but why is there ever a reason for God to infinitely torture people for making the wrong decision?

is there any compelling evidence that means that a single religion is clear that it’s the true religion? no. Islam vs Christianity for example, none of them stand out and there’s reasons for both. so why will God infinitely torture you for just getting unlucky in a reasonable guess based off the evidence you had?

 

[ascensionneeeded]

If you were to send someone to an endless suffering you would be far worse than the criminal

facts

 

[kazama]

There’s no objective answer to this philosophically, because different views of objectivity exist and none are truly universal.

I agree with u and thank u

but why is there ever a reason for God to infinitely torture people for making the wrong decision?

None, he is a god. But some people who follow religion ignore this
Im not an expert, but Idont think theres any verse denying this, so really. Is he a god and does that because he wants to do, u know? I mean, you can quote "but isn't he a good god?" Yes, but we have his parameters. And hes already changed those parameters from the Old Testament to the New

 

[ascensionneeeded]

Mirin, absurdism and humanist mix, prison talk is more pragmatic though.

There’s no objective answer to this philosophically, because different views of objectivity exist and none are truly universal

i disagree.

there’s nothing a human could do that would equally result in them deserving eternal suffering.

how can a finite life of finite actions and finite consequences result in them deserving infinite pain if infinite pain is infinitely times greater than finite pain? the whole point is it is impossible to grasp infinity which is why it’s so inhumane to send someone to suffer eternally. think about it for a second, the suffering never EVER ends. no one deserves that and that is 100% the objective answer.

 

[FiendFiend]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

u have a bojack pfp ur most definitley lower end of the iq spectrum

 

[eyewideshut]

i disagree.

there’s nothing a human could do that would equally result in them deserving eternal suffering.

how can a finite life of finite actions and finite consequences result in them deserving infinite pain if infinite pain is infinitely times greater than finite pain? the whole point is it is impossible to grasp infinity which is why it’s so inhumane to send someone to suffer eternally. think about it for a second, the suffering never EVER ends. no one deserves that and that is 100% the objective answer.

this is a moral arguement, not stating an objective fact. it makes sense, but it's still your framework, not some truth to the universe.

Different people and systems define justice differently as to what @kazama displayed in short. That's exactly why there isn't one objective answer.

 

[ascensionneeeded]

u have a bojack pfp ur most definitley lower end of the iq spectrum

ad hominem argument tells me all i need to know about YOUR iq

 

[kazama]

u have a bojack pfp ur most definitley lower end of the iq spectrum

ad hominem argument tells me all i need to know about YOUR iq

fr, L take. 2025 and people still do this, its being extremely irrational
Trait of people with low iq

 

[JasGews69x]

Cry about it

They would be doing infinite crimes if they were given an infinite life...so they get infinite punishment
God is infinitely greater than anything so rejecting Him would result in Infinite punishment

Try again

 

[tuberculosisinmybal]

This is obviously alluding to religion, I wouldn't but I'm not God for he knows best how about that

this tbh

 

[ascensionneeeded]

Cry about it

They would be doing infinite crimes if they were given an infinite life...so they get infinite punishment
God is infinitely greater than anything so rejecting Him would result in Infinite punishment

Try again

makes no sense

 

[JasGews69x]

makes no sense

What doesnt make sense?

 

[wewuzaryans134]

Cry about it

They would be doing infinite crimes if they were given an infinite life...so they get infinite punishment
God is infinitely greater than anything so rejecting Him would result in Infinite punishment

Try again

99% of men would be doing infinite crime as the bible says jerking off is a sin

 

[FiendFiend]

ad hominem argument tells me all i need to know about YOUR iq

how nigga felt using "ad hominem" in a sentence :

 

[JasGews69x]

99% of men would be doing infinite crime as the bible says jerking off is a sin

Nobody will go to Hell for eternity except for disbelief/associating partners with God
This sin could be forgiven

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

subchad suffering is eternal

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

subchad suffering is eternal

in afterlife Robust Prettyboy Angels will Mog you

 

[gunrenaissance]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

Who cares if they deserve it or not? The world would be a better place if they just suffer and pay for what they've done

 

[ascensionneeeded]

Who cares if they deserve it or not? The world would be a better place if they just suffer and pay for what they've done

this literally just means you are evil

 

[registerfasterusing]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

Nigga in what world does this have an objective answer