let’s see if you are low iq - philosophical question that has an objective answer 🙌

[Gonthar]

no i’m just not stupid and brainwashed

why would an evil god exist? wtf is the point in that? i didn’t ask to exist

There's nothing "evil" in punishing evil people, it's just justice.

 

[Hernan]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

No because Hitler wasnt evil and

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

i kind of agree but neither do i disagree. it would have to seem like eternity, millions of years.

 

[ascensionneeeded]

There's nothing "evil" in punishing evil people, it's just justice.

yeah well it is evil when the punishment is infinitely times worse than the persons actions

that’s not justice

 

[Gonthar]

yeah well it is evil when the punishment is infinitely times worse than the persons actions

that’s not justice

So what would you do with people like Hitler for example if you were a God?

 

[registerfasterusing]

Permanence for this finite world is still finite. Nothing lasts forever. It's not just to give you infinite punishment for what you do in this finite plane. That's the point fuck nigga.


"Beyond the lifetimes" how many lifetimes? Still not infinite

• bad actions deserve an equally bad punishment

• a person cannot carry out an action that has infinitely bad consequences

• therefore no person deserves infinite punishment

Infinite in this context refers to ‘permanent’ because it IS infinite in the given plane, it persists as long as history does. U can say this ‘plane is finite’ but then the consequences would still last as long as the plane does, therefore they infinitely exist within the plane

If ur referring to another plane whose timeline exceeds that which youve prescribed to our own, then id say that there exists an inequality which cant be solved by any form of punishment whatseover, as the definition of time cant be replicated universally across both

Either way, ur making assumptions here that i never made any reference to at all, and also equating things that i dont think should necessarily be equated. Overall i think ur extending my argument beyond what it actually is, so if u would care to explain what im saying and why u disagree then i might actually be able to give u a response

 

[iblamechico]

Infinite in this context refers to ‘permanent’ because it IS infinite in the given plane, it persists as long as history does. U can say this ‘plane is finite’ but then the consequences would still last as long as the plane does, therefore they infinitely exist within the plane

If ur referring to another plane whose timeline exceeds that which youve prescribed to our own, then id say that there exists an inequality which cant be solved by any form of punishment whatseover, as the definition of time cant be replicated universally across both

Either way, ur making assumptions here that i never made any reference to at all, and also equating things that i dont think should necessarily be equated. Overall i think ur extending my argument beyond what it actually is, so if u would care to explain what im saying and why u disagree then i might actually be able to give u a response

If u don't think actions on earth being punishable by eternal damnation to be fair then Idc tbh

 

[iblamechico]

Infinite in this context refers to ‘permanent’ because it IS infinite in the given plane, it persists as long as history does. U can say this ‘plane is finite’ but then the consequences would still last as long as the plane does, therefore they infinitely exist within the plane

If ur referring to another plane whose timeline exceeds that which youve prescribed to our own, then id say that there exists an inequality which cant be solved by any form of punishment whatseover, as the definition of time cant be replicated universally across both

Either way, ur making assumptions here that i never made any reference to at all, and also equating things that i dont think should necessarily be equated. Overall i think ur extending my argument beyond what it actually is, so if u would care to explain what im saying and why u disagree then i might actually be able to give u a response

Besides I wonder how exactly do u quantify "infinite consequences". I'd like to use the word suffering more in this context of eternal punishment tbh.

 

[looksmaxxed]

i would artificially keep alive, resuscitate, whatever, via technologically advanced means, every single leftist, so that they can be tortured and raped for eternity by their pet browns because this is the fate that they have knowingly facilitated for countless people with their farcical and evil doctrines. if there's one thing we whites are more keen on than any other race, it's a sense of justice and proportion.

 

[Troglodyte452]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

I'd say the psychopaths probably deserve it, cause they got mental disorders. Hitler had faith in something and he had millions of his citizens happy in his country


Those underground psychopaths that just kidnap children/torture animals all those creepy fucks from gores should get it back. They literally serve nothing to earth, they dont work jobs just fucking nothing

 

[ascensionneeeded]

I'd say the psychopaths probably deserve it, cause they got mental disorders. Hitler had faith in something and he had millions of his citizens happy in his country


Those underground psychopaths that just kidnap children/torture animals all those creepy fucks from gores should get it back. They literally serve nothing to earth, they dont work jobs just fucking nothing

yeah they are really really fucking evil but still don’t come close to deserving eternal suffering

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

i asked my dad, step mother and step brother this question and they all failed (in my opinion.)

the question is:

would you send someone to eternal suffering? if they had done atrocious things? for example, hitler.

my stance, which is objectively correct, is that no one could commit any act that would make them deserve eternal suffering. someone could kill millions of people and still wouldn’t deserve close to eternal suffering.

no one deserves infinite suffering

I think u are right
To receive infinite suffering
You must do infinite atrocities,which is impossible.

 

[Troglodyte452]

yeah they are really really fucking evil but still don’t come close to deserving eternal suffering

IF we're looking from a religious perspective then maybe but for me, they do

 

[ascensionneeeded]

IF we're looking from a religious perspective then maybe but for me, they do

why infinite and not 1000 years?

imagine being tortured for a year, now imagine 100 years, now 1000, now a billion, now a quadrillion, surely you see my point?

 

[Troglodyte452]

why infinite and not 1000 years?

imagine being tortured for a year, now imagine 100 years, now 1000, now a billion, now a quadrillion, surely you see my point?

Ah I didnt take your question that literally. I just thought until you die, basically hell on earth and you die and then you pay for your sins (if you believe in God)