Lies For The Weak, Beacons For The Deluded. Debunking The Hopepill @looks>books

InanimatePragmatist

InanimatePragmatist

There is nothing for your genetics.
Joined
Feb 13, 2025
Posts
3,594
Reputation
4,696
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: turneywest, FlotPSL, EliasDePoop and 1 other person
who hurt bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: canoli
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
unemployed final boss
 
  • +1
Reactions: looks>books and canoli
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
why do you always post so much ropefuel lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist
unemployed final boss
iu
 
why do you always post so much ropefuel lol
Ah, a member from the Sharties. Well I prefer to keep things clean and orderly. I do not like tiktok kids ruining the message of the Blackpill. The Blackpill is about accepting reality, not trying to change it. You of course improve your life and all but do not expect it make you the next god amongst men.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamegenetics7681
Ah, a member from the Sharties. Well I prefer to keep things clean and orderly. I do not like tiktok kids ruining the message of the Blackpill. The Blackpill is about accepting reality, not trying to change it. You of course improve your life and all but do not expect it make you the next god amongst men.
nigga book a thearhpy session i will pay
 
nigga book a thearhpy session i will pay
Please. I am going to be a therapist in a years time. I always loved seeing how people work. Why not be the doctor then.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: iblamegenetics7681
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
Brutal theworldisnothingbutmatterandit'sprocesses pill :feelswah:. How can looks>bookscels cope?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
You really are intelligent my man
But he is not going to respond to you just like he did not respond to me
Glad u explained it the way i wanted but didnt
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: looks>books and InanimatePragmatist
@looks>books You know, this place is not for a man of your conviction. There is no god in genetics or nature.
OG OP post https://looksmax.org/threads/blackp...fect-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think.1492152/

Yet the comfort of lies. Ah, the classic rebuke. The promise of meaning, wrapped in pleasant stories about divine intention, art, and love. A well written story, yet is the same one that crumbles under scrutiny. Let’s dissect your coping mechanism line by line. You quote Jesus, yet you entirely miss the irony of your own argument. You claim he defies cause and effect by saying, "Love those who hate you." Yet that's exactly cause and effect, just another emotional strategy. Loving the unlovable to gain spiritual merit or inner satisfaction. Everything you do, consciously or subconsciously, serves a biological or psychological purpose. Even altruism can be explained by evolutionary benefit, emotional comfort, or social validation. Your Jesus is not above cause and effect, he's the embodiment of it. He demands love and worship, offering salvation which is an effect for belief and submission, both being cause. No different than any other emotional transaction, just spiritual capitalism disguised as virtue. Let me open your eyes.

Part One: God Is Cause And Effect.

You present an argument for God existing outside cause and effect, yet fail to grasp the contradiction this poses. If God had no beginning, he must exist outside reality as we understand it, yet you apply human logic to something you admit defies it. How very convenient. If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect. Your point then is meaningless. God becomes an abstract fiction used to comfort those who cannot handle their insignificance.

You romanticize art as divine self-expression, yet art itself is profoundly rooted in cause and effect. Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval. No creation happens in a vacuum. Artists seek validation, emotional release, or psychological catharsis, all cause and effect. Your “art” is just emotional commerce wrapped in prettier packaging. Why do we make art? To express emotions triggered by stimuli. Cause, the emotional impulse. Effect, the creation itself. You haven’t debunked cause and effect. you've illustrated it further.
You claim we're “God’s masterpiece,” as if declaring humans special makes it true. It’s comforting but not logical. You romanticize existence to soothe existential dread. This isn't reality, it’s poetry masking desperation. You ask, “Why would a perfect God create us if he didn't need us?” Simple. He wouldn't. The logical conclusion? He doesn't exist, at least not in your benevolent, personal form. Your entire claim hinges on emotion, not logic. Exactly what you accuse nihilists of doing.

Part Two: Love Is Fickle.

You argue that understanding love chemically doesn't diminish it. You're partially correct. Love isn't diminished by scientific explanation. Yet love also isn’t elevated above nature, it remains biological programming. Animals have pair-bonding, loyalty, even mourning. Humans simply romanticize the mechanics, adding layers of mythology to cope with our self-awareness. You said: "True love is attraction plus imprint" Correct and you've just defined another biological transaction. Attraction, hormones, genes plus imprint and neurological conditioning. You haven’t debunked nihilism, you only merely confirmed it.

You say life is personal because people love your good parts. Congratulations, you've accepted transactional affection. Acknowledging you’re liked for your looks, status, money, or personality isn’t deep, it is rather obvious. Personal isn't the opposite of transactional. Personal just means the transaction involves your specific qualities. It doesn't erase the harsh truth, if the qualities fade, so does affection. There's no unconditional love. No transcendental loyalty. Only conditions. Only temporary approval until the conditions expire. Your movie analogy? A movie is a product, consumed and discarded once it no longer entertains. Thanks for clarifying how disposable love truly is.

Part Three: Think Before You Cope.

Your entire post is a beautifully constructed cope. You are rebirthing your psyche from half truths and romantic delusions. You're not debunking the blackpill. you're reinforcing it but desperately trying to paint it pretty colors. You traded clarity for comfort, logic for poetry, and truth for hope. I understand why but reality is brutal. It will confide to your comfort and it doesn't change truth. it just blinds you to it. Enjoy your illusions. I prefer the cold clarity of reality.
“Everything you do serves a biological purpose”

Art doesnt. Loving those who hate you doesnt.

“oh muh its so you can go to heaven its still selfish” then you arent christian you do it bc its right, not bc you go to heaven.

“Oh muh its bc then virtue signaling” then im done with you youll find a cope for everything these clearly debunk animalistic primal survival instincts.

Part three:
“If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect.”

Not really. He still exists in reality, i mean hes REAL aint he? (In this scenario), he just defies logic. Why would he not

“Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval”
I debunked this in my post. People who just enjoy art for the sake of it.

Part three love is ficke:
Idk if you can read or not ig not.

I agreed with this in my post. No love on earth is non transactional. Thats why God’s is so powerful. This is a broken world, and God loves you without a reason.

But still lets say you’re an athiest, love is still very cool. No animal feels love like we do. Sure it may just be chemicals and bc someone is attractive but its still very good to be able to feel love.
Only incels would disagree (bc they want to not love the person bc they wouldnt love them back)


Also, a word of advice:

Simple sales
Fancy fails

Using big fancy words doesnt make you right. Im too busy to be arguing with some stranger on .org thats why im not formatting professionally.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FlotPSL
“Everything you do serves a biological purpose”

Art doesnt. Loving those who hate you doesnt.

“oh muh its so you can go to heaven its still selfish” then you arent christian you do it bc its right, not bc you go to heaven.

“Oh muh its bc then virtue signaling” then im done with you youll find a cope for everything these clearly debunk animalistic primal survival instincts.

Part three:
“If this entity truly existed beyond cause and effect, it’s completely irrelevant to us, beings bound entirely by cause and effect.”

Not really. He still exists in reality, i mean hes REAL aint he? (In this scenario), he just defies logic. Why would he not

“Every brushstroke, every creation emerges from emotional impulses driven by neurotransmitters, environmental stimuli, evolutionary drives, or social approval”
I debunked this in my post. People who just enjoy art for the sake of it.

Part three love is ficke:
Idk if you can read or not ig not.

I agreed with this in my post. No love on earth is non transactional. Thats why God’s is so powerful. This is a broken world, and God loves you without a reason.

But still lets say you’re an athiest, love is still very cool. No animal feels love like we do. Sure it may just be chemicals and bc someone is attractive but its still very good to be able to feel love.
Only incels would disagree (bc they want to not love the person bc they wouldnt love them back)


Also, a word of advice:

Simple sales
Fancy fails

Using big fancy words doesnt make you right. Im too busy to be arguing with some stranger on .org thats why im not formatting professionally.
There is nothing. You will only hurt yourself chasing what never was real.
 
There is nothing. You will only hurt yourself chasing what never was real.
DO NOT MAKE SOME LONG AS REPLY LET ME END THIS NOW

Anser in yes or no: do your choices matter or not
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FlotPSL
DO NOT MAKE SOME LONG AS REPLY LET ME END THIS NOW

Anser in yes or no: do your choices matter or not
worthless /wûrth′lĭs/

adjective​

  1. Lacking worth; of no use or value.
  2. Low; despicable.
    "that worthless friend of his."
  3. Destitute of worth; having no value, virtue, excellence, dignity, or the like; undeserving; valueless; useless; vile; mean.
    "a worthless garment; a worthless ship; a worthless man or woman; a worthless magistrate"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: looks>books
worthless /wûrth′lĭs/

adjective​

  1. Lacking worth; of no use or value.
  2. Low; despicable.
    "that worthless friend of his."
  3. Destitute of worth; having no value, virtue, excellence, dignity, or the like; undeserving; valueless; useless; vile; mean.
    "a worthless garment; a worthless ship; a worthless man or woman; a worthless magistrate"
Yes or no, still waiting buddy.

Yes or no question
 
Sorry for writing off-topic. The only positive thing is that with the Christianization of Europe, Scandinavian countries and Slavic peoples it gave impetus to the development of these countries. For example, in the Scandinavian peoples and in the Slavic peoples, writing appeared under Christianity and also connected the peoples with each other due to a single religion. It is stupid to deny the contribution of development, but one also asks: why the hell do we need this religion at the moment with such teachings?
 
  • +1
Reactions: InanimatePragmatist

Similar threads

O
Replies
5
Views
155
Oreone
O
got.daim
Replies
16
Views
487
Hernan
Hernan
W
Replies
51
Views
666
russiopathic
russiopathic

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top