ZINSSER
Iron
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2026
- Posts
- 51
- Reputation
- 12
Looks are one of the least important factors for having sex
If you deny this fact you are denying literally all the data we have on this subject.
See the graph on the right (Boegart and Fisher, 1995)
In this study, men's attractiveness correlated with sexual partners at r = .2, which is a consistent finding across pretty much all studies on this
That means roughly 4% of the variation in bodycount is thanks to PSL. If you don't understand what all these statistics words mean, to put it blunt, looks isn't what determines if you get sex or not.
Here are a handful of traits that are more or as strongly predictive of bodycount than face or height in men:
- Grip strength
- Perceived Upper body strength
- Extraversion
- Conscientiousness (inverse correlation)
- Dominance
- Willingness to have sex (slampig maxxing)
- Alcohol usage
This is why roids are the number one looksmax. Yes, they make you physically more attractive, but they also make you more motivated, brave, extraverted, and dominant- this is key in any situation where there are girls. Imagine being in a club and not knowing what to do with yourself vs. being so low inhib you go up to foids and are so pushy that it's borderline rape. This works, and it's why alcohol is necessary for parties.
Some call it cope but natural bodybuilding has its merit. There's plenty of success stories of normies becoming sexually and socially successful after gaining a solid 10-20lbs in the gym. Those who call this cope are the same people LDARing and hopping between this forum and ome.tv all day.
