Looks is about falios

[Deleted member 22886]

The most important parts of your looks is your falios, not your halos.

For example height. If you're shorter than 5'8 height is your falio and gives you -2 to your overall look /10. But if you're 5'8-6'2 height isn't your halo. It becomes halo after 6'3 , but it doesn't give you +2 to your overall looks, it can max give you +1 to your overall looks.

Or you don't have chiseled jawline. It gives from -1 to -3 depends on your bf℅. But if you have a chiseled jawline it gives like +0.5 to your overall looks.

 

[eduardkoopman]

just down have failos theory, is correct.

 

[Deleted member 2729]

Just maxx everything theory

 

[Deleted member 17244]

Just maxx everything theory

just reroll life with a perfect bone structure, pheno and colouring theory strikes again

 

[BucketCrab]

Roughly correct.
I'd word it like this: being sorely lacking in ONE aspect is much more of a flaw than having ONE exceptional feature is an advantage.

But at the same time, being painfully average in all aspects won't make you attractive. It's all about having no major failos, while having some halos.

But then again; not all failos and halos are the same. Being shorter than 5'5 is unsalvageable; having a subpar frame isn't.