S
scoobmcdoobington
Iron
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2026
- Posts
- 19
- Reputation
- 2
My thoughts on looksiq, considering hltn to be average then:
<40% = sub5
40% = lltn
45% = mltn
50% = hltn
55% = lmtn
60% = mmtn
65% = hmtn
70% = lhtn
75% = mhtn
80% = hhtn
85% = cl
90% = chad
This is how I’d think it would be normally, however since most of the people on the site are looksmaxxers from the forum I’d say 1 tier higher than this, as these people are usually more attractive on average. Since it’s just a voting system based on attractiveness I think it is more accurate compared to those bs facial ratios sites. As we all know this site tends to underrate so having an idea based on how attractive you are compared to others seems to be a more useful tool to gauge yourself. I don’t know how wais did the formula for calculating the score but in a neutral setting this is how I would rate it. I think advertising to more normies or girls would be useful though as it being as it is right now I feel in general it skews the population to the more attractive side.
<40% = sub5
40% = lltn
45% = mltn
50% = hltn
55% = lmtn
60% = mmtn
65% = hmtn
70% = lhtn
75% = mhtn
80% = hhtn
85% = cl
90% = chad
This is how I’d think it would be normally, however since most of the people on the site are looksmaxxers from the forum I’d say 1 tier higher than this, as these people are usually more attractive on average. Since it’s just a voting system based on attractiveness I think it is more accurate compared to those bs facial ratios sites. As we all know this site tends to underrate so having an idea based on how attractive you are compared to others seems to be a more useful tool to gauge yourself. I don’t know how wais did the formula for calculating the score but in a neutral setting this is how I would rate it. I think advertising to more normies or girls would be useful though as it being as it is right now I feel in general it skews the population to the more attractive side.
