Looks theory destroyed: The future of men.

[Unhuman]

 

[Deleted member 24410]

 

[Deleted member 18879]

i dont get it? whores with adhd having lots of kids who also have no education?

 

[Unhuman]

i dont get it? whores with adhd having lots of kids who also have no education?

All these traits apply to men not women.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

or maybe this just proves low iq subhumans reproduce the most. with other low iq subhumans. (which we knew already)

the high iq genetic moggers dont reproduce as much so it doesnt show

 

[Unhuman]

or maybe this just proves low iq subhumans reproduce the most. with other low iq subhumans. (which we knew already)

the high iq genetic moggers dont reproduce as much so it doesnt show

This means that high IQ genetic moggers are being selected out of the genepool if they pass on their genes less over time.

 

[UglyAsHell]

or maybe this just proves low iq subhumans reproduce the most. with other low iq subhumans. (which we knew already)

the high iq genetic moggers dont reproduce as much so it doesnt show

High iq is a flaw

 

[Deleted member 8365]

 

[eduardkoopman]

it says nothing about the quality of women these men got with.

Still I agree.
being extraverted, and open to doing dope with dopehead women. will increase laycount.

high iq, just gets in the way, of fun and being extraverted. lol @ being smart, when trying to lay.

 

[Deleted member 23778]

Imagine a slayer being legit smart. You need a level of stupidity to slay.

 

[Deleted member 26859]

High iq is a flaw

no, you still get sex. but decide not to reproduce as much

 

[Deleted member 30411]

no, you still get sex. but decide not to reproduce as much

Why would any smart man who is attractive reproduce he knows this world is hell and he wishes he never was birb so why he give birth?

 

[Artemis]

This means that high IQ genetic moggers are being selected out of the genepool if they pass on their genes less over time.

I knew it!

This is the future:

 

[Ken]

Im too low iq to understand this.

 

[Deleted member 8758]

What race where these people?

 

[Deleted member 28904]

So I have a chance

 

[Deleted member 27660]

lmfao you guys acting like high iq is bad

high iq people create things, make the world what it is

even if the world is shitty it would be a hell of a lot worse w out high iq ppl

 

[sub5outsider]

just look like shit theory ?

 

[Crusile]

Tldr? Behavioral genetics doesn't exist, it's impossible to select for "thoughts". There are no "thoughts" in the genes

 

[bugbug]

To me, the results suggest moody people with low impulse control reproduce more, that's why ADHD, smoking and obesity are associated with more fertility, while education, intelligence and smoking cessation (all of which are related to impulse control in some way) have a negative association. For men, it seems there's also a big correlation with being extroverted and neurotypical.

Just be a dumb extrovert with low impulse control theory.

Also, here's another statistic from the same study about lifetime sex partners and partner presence (= long-term relationship). It seems most of the effects are related to casual sex, because there's not much difference in partner presence.

 

[Unhuman]

What race where these people?

Can't say unless the data provides it.

 

[Unhuman]

just look like shit theory ?

Just be a low IQ dog theory.

 

[TUSSELEIF]

Bruh autists are hated more than fatasses, chain-smokers, alcoholics, depressed neurotic people, ADHDcels and estrogenic manlets. It’s fucking over lol

 

[reptiles]

Bruh autists are hated more than fatasses, chain-smokers, alcoholics, depressed neurotic people, ADHDcels and estrogenic manlets. It’s fucking over lol

View attachment 2256706

Yeah but this data seems sus it doesn't mention the gender we know women with bad genes reproduce more any ways so this doesn't point towards a dysgenic trend on the male end also autism is unfixable it's genetic quite literally

 

[reptiles]

I knew it!

This is the future:

Seems like a cope tbqh because according to data 45 percent of women by 2030 will be single and child less I wish this cope was true tbqh

 

[Artemis]

Seems like a cope tbqh because according to data 45 percent of women by 2030 will be single and child less I wish this cope was true tbqh

It depends on the country.

But I for certain know, that high intelligence is NEGATIVELY CORRELATED with mating success and sex in general.

The cleverer, the higher chance to die alone without kids.

 

[reptiles]

It depends on the country.

But I for certain know, that high intelligence is NEGATIVELY CORRELATED with mating success and sex in general.

The cleverer, the higher chance to die alone without kids.

No jfl clever ppl figured out the scam the world is run by your genetic quality and the genes you had in the womb why in god's name would they bring another person into this hell hole

 

[Artemis]

No jfl clever ppl figured out the scam the world is run by your genetic quality and the genes you had in the womb why in god's name would they bring another person into this hell hole

Clever move

 

[nitesik]

It depends on the country.

But I for certain know, that high intelligence is NEGATIVELY CORRELATED with mating success and sex in general.

The cleverer, the higher chance to die alone without kids.

yet our brains just grew larger overtime. Women select by intellect but without realising that they select by intellect

 

[Artemis]

yet our brains just grew larger overtime. Women select by intellect but without realising that they select by intellect

Not anymore.

The study was conducted recently.

In the past, you needed somewhat high intelligence (relatively) to survive and become rich, which guaranteed procreation, because in the past money and status were the main selection factors.

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

No jfl clever ppl figured out the scam the world is run by your genetic quality and the genes you had in the womb why in god's name would they bring another person into this hell hole

This is why the retards won

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

Weakening selection pressures and Malthusianism:

We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean.

Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial revolution created modern technology and modern medicine, it changed social structures and created globalization, which collectively contributed to a weakening of selection pressures. This meant that those who are low iq and are physically unhealthy, lacking capacity for delayed gratification and therein predisposed to a lifestyle premised on living fast and having lots of sex/engaging in hedonism, would have otherwise died under harsh selection pressures. Instead, such dysgenic populations have been afforded a social safety net, in the form of modern political, economic and medical intervention, afforded to by excess production, post-industrial revolution. This dysgenic population has for over 100 year bred at a rate far beyond those who preference resource accumulation and delayed breeding (populations that typically possess a higher iq and health, which are correlated, and who, pre-industrial revolution, were the population who bred the most, as it was their high iq and health that enabled them to cope well with harsh pre-industrial selection pressures).

Scientific evidence of dysgenics:

Notwithstanding cyclical nature of fertility, there is evidence of dysgenics.

There is an evidenced of a lowering of IQ in native populations like northern European countries, even when adjusted for the influence of immigrant populations:

Lynn (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations

Dutton, Linden, Lynn (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review.

These authors, in their further publications, have also noted a decrease in color discrimination ability and verbal expression.

Reaction times are decreasing:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289613000470

GWAS or genome wide association studies evidence frequencies of genes associated with intelligencem decreasing generationally among native populations:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612113114

What does this mean?
If the iq of western countries continues to decline at current rates, the average western iq will be ~80, meaning society will be incapable of coming up with novel scientific or industrial ideas, meaning society won't progress, less alone even maintain current infrastructure.

I suspect that the elites' agenda 2030 campaign (sacrificing individual liberties to justify increasingly authoritarian measures), aims to lessen the blow from the incoming Malthusian decline, by limiting consumption, travel and social mobility, while ensuring those that are in power now, continue to be in power as society declines as dysgenics and civil unrest increases. Their perspective is that such social restrictions (social credit score, carbon footprint, digital ID) will act as social insulation, against humanities genetic and eventual social, political and economic suicide.

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs

Preamble This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable...

sdgs.un.org

Similarly, the movement towards CRSPR technology, albeit in its infancy, and polygenic risk scoring (selecting against diseases currently and eventually for "questionable" traits like intelligence etc), are further measures to counter dysgenics.

What is CRISPR?

CRISPR is a technology that can be used to edit genes and, as such, will likely change the world.

www.newscientist.com

Polygenic Risk Scores

A polygenic risk score is one way by which people can learn what their risk of developing a disease is, based on the total number of genomics variants related to the disease.

www.genome.gov

Finally, the elites obsession with transhumanism (From Elon musk's neuralink to increasing scientific interest in nanolipid and graphene technology touted for its wide ranging application such as novel application for medical delivery) may also be an attempt to reverse dysgenics. The US government with the following two documents remarks on the widespread application of nano tech and human use.

Publications | National Nanotechnology Initiative

Further sources:

Neuralink — Pioneering Brain Computer Interfaces

Creating a generalized brain interface to restore autonomy to those with unmet medical needs today and unlock human potential tomorrow.

neuralink.com

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c04996

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588097/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191226/

 

[Unhuman]

Weakening selection pressures and Malthusianism:

We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean.

Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial revolution created modern technology and modern medicine, it changed social structures and created globalization, which collectively contributed to a weakening of selection pressures. This meant that those who are low iq and are physically unhealthy, lacking capacity for delayed gratification and therein predisposed to a lifestyle premised on living fast and having lots of sex/engaging in hedonism, would have otherwise died under harsh selection pressures. Instead, such dysgenic populations have been afforded a social safety net, in the form of modern political, economic and medical intervention, afforded to by excess production, post-industrial revolution. This dysgenic population has for over 100 year bred at a rate far beyond those who preference resource accumulation and delayed breeding (populations that typically possess a higher iq and health, which are correlated, and who, pre-industrial revolution, were the population who bred the most, as it was their high iq and health that enabled them to cope well with harsh pre-industrial selection pressures).

Scientific evidence of dysgenics:

Notwithstanding cyclical nature of fertility, there is evidence of dysgenics.

There is an evidenced of a lowering of IQ in native populations like northern European countries, even when adjusted for the negative influence of immigrant populations:

Lynn (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations

Dutton, Linden, Lynn (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review.

These authors, in their further publications, have also noted a decrease in color discrimination ability and verbal expression.

Reaction times are decreasing:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289613000470

GWAS or genome wide association studies evidence frequencies of genes associated with intelligencem decreasing generationally among native populations:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612113114

What does this mean?
If the iq of western countries continues to decline at current rates, the average western iq will be ~80, meaning society will be incapable of coming up with novel scientific or industrial ideas, meaning society won't progress, less alone even maintain current infrastructure.

I suspect that the elites' agenda 2030 campaign (sacrificing individual liberties to justify increasingly authoritarian measures), aims to lessen the blow from the incoming Malthusian decline, by limiting consumption, travel and social mobility, while ensuring those that are in power now, continue to be in power as society declines as dysgenics and civil unrest increases. Their perspective is that such social restrictions (social credit score, carbon footprint, digital ID) will act as social insulation, against humanities genetic and eventual social, political and economic suicide.

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs

Preamble This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable...

sdgs.un.org

Similarly, the movement towards CRSPR technology, albeit in its infancy, and polygenic risk scoring (selecting against diseases currently and eventually for "questionable" traits like intelligence etc), are further measures to counter dysgenics.

What is CRISPR?

CRISPR is a technology that can be used to edit genes and, as such, will likely change the world.

www.newscientist.com

Polygenic Risk Scores

A polygenic risk score is one way by which people can learn what their risk of developing a disease is, based on the total number of genomics variants related to the disease.

www.genome.gov

Finally, the elites obsession with transhumanism (From Elon musk's neuralink to increasing scientific interest in nanolipid and graphene technology touted for its wide ranging application such as novel application for medical delivery) may also be an attempt to reverse dysgenics. The US government with the following two documents remarks on the widespread application of nano tech and human use.

Publications | National Nanotechnology Initiative

Further sources:

Neuralink — Pioneering Brain Computer Interfaces

Creating a generalized brain interface to restore autonomy to those with unmet medical needs today and unlock human potential tomorrow.

neuralink.com

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.1c04996

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3588097/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191226/

There's a lot wrong with this post.

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

There's a lot wrong with this post.

I'd love to read your perspective instead of a blanket claim, with no argument/substantiation.

 

[Deleted member 28904]

I'd love to read your perspective instead of a blanket claim, with no argument.

 

[Unhuman]

I'd love to read your perspective instead of a blanket claim, with no argument/substantiation.

My two main points are the following:

We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean.

History has consistently prove Malthusianism wrong. During Malthus's time colonialism was consistently able to prevent overpopulation. Another example is the invention of the Haber process which dramatically increased fertiliser production which increased food production which increased the global population. Right now, there is enough food to feed everyone however people go hungry because we live in an inefficient economic system. Human innovation has been able to consistent prevent any time of Malthusian collapse which is why I don't believe in the idea.

Lynn (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations

Dutton, Linden, Lynn (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review.

They're all pseudoscientists with shoddy reputations.

 

[Unhuman]

Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial revolution created modern technology and modern medicine, it changed social structures and created globalization, which collectively contributed to a weakening of selection pressures

How do you even measure the effect or correlation of dysgenics against societal collapse?

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

History has consistently prove Malthusianism wrong. During Malthus's time colonialism was consistently able to prevent overpopulation.

In other words, you are saying that if a theory is wrong during a specific point in time, it must be wrong again, especially after the surrounding factors have materially changed (population has x10 since Malthus' time). This is a grave misconception. I think you underestimate the likelihood of declining excess production, which will likely result in shutting off aid to Africa or the Middle East, as well as all the other genetic and social factors I have listed, which will likely cause an inevitable Malthusian collapse.

Another example is the invention of the Haber process which dramatically increased fertiliser production which increased food production which increased the global population

Per capita genius peaked in the 1800s. Per capita genius peaked in the 1800s. Continued innovation will decline as it has been declining. Eventually there will be a genetic tipping point through which there will be no more innovation and we will struggle to maintain existing technology and infrastructure.

Right now, there is enough food to feed everyone however people go hungry because we live in an inefficient economic system.

Why do you think Agenda 2030 is redefining the food system? Why do you think Dutch farmers are forced to further cut nitrogen use? Why do you think the Irish and farmers all over Europe, have their governments considering forcibly acquiring their farms and livestock? If there is so much food why would they do this?
Maybe its to augment the food supply with technology and force GMO, nanolipid, vertically farmed, consumption of genetically altered and cultured fruit, vegetables, meat and bugs.

Grow and eat your own vaccines?

The future of vaccines may look more like eating a salad than getting a shot in the arm. UC Riverside scientists are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories.

news.ucr.edu

Frontiers | Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom – A Review

Products derived from agricultural biotechnology is fast becoming one of the biggest agricultural trade commodities globally, clothing us, feeding our livest...

www.frontiersin.org

Lab-grown meat: How is it produced? | World Economic Forum

Insects could soon be appearing on restaurant menus in Europe | World Economic Forum

However, humans are not adapted to mass consumption of such foods. Forcing this on humans, may have long term effects, especially if food that humans have eaten for 1000+ years - grass fed, antibiotic free, preservative free, pesticide free, meat, diary, poultry, vegetables and fruit are wholly unavailable and/or technologically augmented.
The likely argument is that the elites' seek to use excess population, to test alternative food system BECAUSE of the THREAT of a Malthusian decline: hence why, the elites always talk about the importance of "sustainability" in all facets of consumption.
I guess you probably think the Club of Romes' 'Limits to growth' report was a joke, or needless catastrophizing?

Human innovation has been able to consistent prevent any time of Malthusian collapse which is why I don't believe in the idea.

You are saying that because 100 years have past, of noted dysgenics, that a Malthusian collapse will never occur, while disregarding all evidence of genetic and social decline, I have already put forth.

Such a degree of potential population decline, from a total population of around 8 billion, has never occurred. As a large concentration of the population is located in regions dependent on aid, which relies on excess production, as the genome declines, rendering excess production less, the aid will likely cease, causing population decline. We have already gone through the dark ages and given everything I have described above, it is very possible a Malthusian collapse may occur again.

The argument then becomes that the technological augmentation/AI/polygenic risk scoring/CRISPR is a race against time: a race against dysgenics or the point at which society cannot innovate, and a Malthusian collapse is inevitable and unavoidable. Those in power seek to "insulate" themselves from the impending collapse through reorganizing society and concentrating power in the executive, more so than ever before: Cue the Agenda 2030 campaign, social credit scores, carbon credit scores, digital IDs and central bank digital currencies.

They're all pseudoscientists with shoddy reputations.

Ahh, yes, the "peer review" system, where only ideas confirmed to be true by others can be ratified as "true". In other words, only ideas already accepted and mainstream enough, can be accepted.

 

[Unhuman]

Why do you think Agenda 2030 is redefining the food system? Why do you think Dutch farmers are forced to further cut nitrogen use? Why do you think the Irish and farmers all over Europe, have their governments considering forcibly acquiring their farms and livestock? If there is so much food why would they do this?
Maybe its to augment the food supply with technology and force GMO, nanolipid, vertically farmed, consumption of genetically altered and cultured fruit, vegetables, meat and bugs.

Climate change. In fact what you are contributing to excess population growth I am contributing to climate change and a wasteful economy, not genes.

Ahh, yes, the "peer review" system, where only ideas confirmed to be true by others can be ratified as "true". In other words, only ideas already accepted and mainstream enough, can be accepted.

There are definitely problems with the peer review system but they are still grifters even if they are not peer reviewed. For example, Edward Dutton received his degree in theology and had his honorary teaching title removed for plagiarism.

 

[Deleted member 26633]

or maybe this just proves low iq subhumans reproduce the most. with other low iq subhumans. (which we knew already)

the high iq genetic moggers dont reproduce as much so it doesnt show

literally this. men at the forefront of academic research should have their semen samples taken which would then be used to impregnate hundreds of thousands of white women. everyone else should get sterilised.

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

Climate change.

>Climate change
In some alternate universe, I want you to live in a hypothetical world with far lower C02 than the current earth, so that you can suffer at the hands of your own gullibility (in such a world all mammalian life would likely starve to death and go extinct).

In fact what you are contributing to excess population growth I am contributing to climate change and a wasteful economy, not genes.

Suspending disbelief of the manmade climate change argument, this and a "wasteful economy" are both the product of genetics, as GENETICS create the capacity to solve problems consistently, expediently and effectively, which is the link to the impending Malthusian collapse in the future.

There are definitely problems with the peer review system but they are still grifters even if they are not peer reviewed. For example, Edward Dutton received his degree in theology and had his honorary teaching title removed for plagiarism.

>Proceeds to cast ad hominem attacks without refuting Dutton's arguments, as you originally did with me in this thread. Now we are just going around in circles. This is a waste of time.

For example, Edward Dutton received his degree in theology

You should assess peoples IDEAS. Not what there degree is in.

and had his honorary teaching title removed for plagiarism.

Yes, this should put one on notice, but doesn't mean you wholly dismiss the substance of ones IDEAS. It is also not a sufficient argument to refute the above ideas.

I am going to leave your thread. Thank you for attempting to challenge my opinion. I think you wholly wrong, even if you think you are right.

 

[Deleted member 23391]

LOL remember when all the spergs and cunt worshipers said feminism was eugenic and modern dating was a retvrn to nature. Turns out it's dysgenic as fuck because high IQ women having a career in HR and fucking Chads (but not having their kids) until their wombs are rotten and then having an autistic tard baby with IVF at 40 isn't eugenic, who knew.

 

[Sprinkles]

me tryna understand this shit:

 

[thereallegend]

I think you underestimate the likelihood of declining excess production, which will likely result in shutting off aid to Africa or the Middle East

Africa has more than enough food. Just look at how much the population’s exploding over there.
There isn’t excess production under capitalism anyway. 33% of food is thrown out. Only incentive is to sell food for profit, not end world hunger.

 

[thereallegend]

literally this. men at the forefront of academic research should have their semen samples taken which would then be used to impregnate hundreds of thousands of white women. everyone else should get sterilised.

You’ll never get women to agree to that. Women still care about face height race when buying sperm donations.

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

Africa has more than enough food. Just look at how much the population’s exploding over there.
There isn’t excess production under capitalism anyway. 33% of food is thrown out. Only incentive is to sell food for profit, not end world hunger.

There is a well documented food crisis in Africa.

Africa Food Crisis

Millions are going hungry in Africa. Help save lives. DONATE NOW The Immediate Food Crisis Africa is currently facing the worst food crisis since 1945.

worldrelief.org

Nothing to eat: Food crisis is soaring across Africa

A changing climate, increases in conflict and unproductive farming have compounded the food crisis in Africa. The ICRC has called for interventions.

www.icrc.org

However, there is the argument that the resources in Africa are not efficiency utilized. The decline of contemporary Zimbabwe and South Africa, evidence this.

There isn’t excess production under capitalism anyway

33% of food is thrown out

These contradict each other.
If food is thrown out, it can be seen as excess, under a capitalistic environment.
Some have defined excess production as anything that feeds non productive members of society. The opposing perspective includes production given to non productive members of society, as comprising the "whole" of production.

Regardless, America provides $2 billion in food assistance to Africa annually.

The Great American Food Aid Boondoggle

The United States could feed millions more people—if it changed outdated policies.

foreignpolicy.com

This aid is made possible because of excess production and America's position as the financial leader of the world with the US standard. If the US did not have excess production (social, financial, political, energy wise) they would not be the financial standard and they would be unable to give aid to Africa.

 

[FutureSlayer]

>Climate change
In some alternate universe, I want you to live in a hypothetical world with far lower C02 than the current earth, so that you can suffer at the hands of your own gullibility (in such a world all mammalian life would likely starve to death and go extinct).

Suspending disbelief of the manmade climate change argument, this and a "wasteful economy" are both the product of genetics, as GENETICS create the capacity to solve problems consistently, expediently and effectively, which is the link to the impending Malthusian collapse in the future.

>Proceeds to cast ad hominem attacks without refuting Dutton's arguments, as you originally did with me in this thread. Now we are just going around in circles. This is a waste of time.

You should assess peoples IDEAS. Not what there degree is in.

Yes, this should put one on notice, but doesn't mean you wholly dismiss the substance of ones IDEAS. It is also not a sufficient argument to refute the above ideas.

I am going to leave your thread. Thank you for attempting to challenge my opinion. I think you wholly wrong, even if you think you are right.

can you provide a Society collapse implications list?

 

[humanoidsub7]

.is users in the making

 

[Deleted member 30892]

Explain this shit

 

[Halonyx]

You can see the effects of dysgenics already. Fucking degenerates everywhere, low-IQ is the norm and in order to be NT you literally have to act retarded