Measure the subhumanity on your face in python

RedPilledStemcel

RedPilledStemcel

mandiblecel manlet
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Posts
3,343
Reputation
2,388
http://www.tiesdekok.com/calculatefwhr/

This calculates fwhr in a different way (makes midface longer), so the ideal 1.8-2.0 is probably more like 1.53-1.7 (tested this on the zygos poster boy, and he got a ~1.7). Follow the directions and post your score. 1.53 (this may seem sus, but 1.8*(1.7/2) is 1.53, so I did not just make it 1.53 because I got that)

Follow the directions on the site or your score will be inaccurate. Don't tilt your head like a faggot.
 
Last edited:
Did 2 pics. Got 1.65 and 1.69
 
Who's the zygos poster boy?
 
1545691997615
This guy
 
Got 1.7 btw.
 
What bodyfat does one need to be to get cheeks like that? What bf% is this boi?
Having zygos like that is genetics lol.
Maybe like 1% of the population has zygos like that.

Even if this guy was fat you'd still see his protruding zygos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Future Arablite
What bodyfat does one need to be to get cheeks like that? What bf% is this boi?
10-12% probably, but he has that look more because of his insane zygos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
Mewing in theory should widen zygos by a little bit btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
Got 1.65. The fuck does this mean? srs
 
Got 1.65. The fuck does this mean? srs
You're 100% an autist so there is a 90% chance you fucked the picture/measurement up or you're fat. Assuming you didn't tilt your head, use a low quality photo, used the selfie cam, or you aren't a landwhale (greater than 12% bf), you have a fwhr in the ok range. This also assumes you just dont have a jackma tier midface.
 
You're 100% an autist so there is a 90% chance you fucked the picture/measurement up or you're fat. Assuming you didn't tilt your head, use a low quality photo, used the selfie cam, or you aren't a landwhale (greater than 12% bf), you have a fwhr in the ok range. This also assumes you just dont have a jackma tier midface.
If the model guy got 1.7 FWHR ratio and mine is 1.65 that's pretty good news to me you little shit, isn't it?
 
1.68-1.69.

I redid it using my back camera and got a 1.66
 
Last edited:
If the model guy got 1.7 FWHR ratio and mine is 1.65 that's pretty good news to me you little shit, isn't it?
>Implying a random online app is 100% accurate
 
Did a few more tests, this app is pretty shit/inaccurate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
>Implying a random online app is 100% accurate
I really have no clue tbqh. But AI is better than nothing I guess. Very interesting stuff. I hope within the next 5 years we'll have an AI which could calculate such things with 100% precision.
 
I really have no clue tbqh. But AI is better than nothing I guess. Very interesting stuff. I hope within the next 5 years we'll have an AI which could calculate such things with 100% precision.
we already do, this one was just made poorly.
 
Cool. Could you link me to that 100% accurate software then? Could answer some of my questions :)
Probably costs money. I didnt see any other online than the one he posted
 
got 1.62 is that bad or good
 
1.54, it calculates it wrong though, I should have around ~1.75, still low
 
Probably costs money. I didnt see any other online than the one he posted
Does anyone know what software @BeautifulBones uses? Surely it costs money, but I wouldn't mind paying for it as long as it's good enough.
 
1.54, it calculates it wrong though, I should have around ~1.75, still low
It's inconsistent on an individual basis but the ratios are low because it measures the midface height from the top of your eyebrow to ~the middle of your lips.
 
Doesnt ever load shit for me
1.67
 
Last edited:
Got 1.66, tried on Tom Cruise’s pic and he got 1.67
 
I got 1.5

I assume that is bad
 
I got 1.5

I assume that is bad
ye but also irrelevant, it doesn't count it right
1545739811573

1545739826117

1545740435562

you should count it like this

1.80+ is good
1.85+ is ideal

Meeks is 1.90
1545739941900

Barrett is like 2.1
 
Last edited:
Didn't work for me. Here is my pic, can you guys calculate?

1545783911553
 
I got 1.68 with a phone camera pic so it’s a little distorted

This measures from the top of your eyebrows rather than the bottom. Measured from the bottom my fwhr is 2.3
 

Similar threads

irrumator praetor
Replies
24
Views
2K
IAMNOTANINCEL
IAMNOTANINCEL
D
Replies
34
Views
4K
applesrgreat
applesrgreat
D
Replies
5
Views
3K
herring
herring

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top