Measure the subhumanity on your face in python

RedPilledStemcel

RedPilledStemcel

mandiblecel manlet
Joined
Dec 5, 2018
Posts
3,343
Reputation
2,395
http://www.tiesdekok.com/calculatefwhr/

This calculates fwhr in a different way (makes midface longer), so the ideal 1.8-2.0 is probably more like 1.53-1.7 (tested this on the zygos poster boy, and he got a ~1.7). Follow the directions and post your score. 1.53 (this may seem sus, but 1.8*(1.7/2) is 1.53, so I did not just make it 1.53 because I got that)

Follow the directions on the site or your score will be inaccurate. Don't tilt your head like a faggot.
 
Last edited:
Did 2 pics. Got 1.65 and 1.69
 
Who's the zygos poster boy?
 
1545691997615
This guy
 
Got 1.7 btw.
 
What bodyfat does one need to be to get cheeks like that? What bf% is this boi?
Having zygos like that is genetics lol.
Maybe like 1% of the population has zygos like that.

Even if this guy was fat you'd still see his protruding zygos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Future Arablite
What bodyfat does one need to be to get cheeks like that? What bf% is this boi?
10-12% probably, but he has that look more because of his insane zygos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
Mewing in theory should widen zygos by a little bit btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
Got 1.65. The fuck does this mean? srs
 
Got 1.65. The fuck does this mean? srs
You're 100% an autist so there is a 90% chance you fucked the picture/measurement up or you're fat. Assuming you didn't tilt your head, use a low quality photo, used the selfie cam, or you aren't a landwhale (greater than 12% bf), you have a fwhr in the ok range. This also assumes you just dont have a jackma tier midface.
 
You're 100% an autist so there is a 90% chance you fucked the picture/measurement up or you're fat. Assuming you didn't tilt your head, use a low quality photo, used the selfie cam, or you aren't a landwhale (greater than 12% bf), you have a fwhr in the ok range. This also assumes you just dont have a jackma tier midface.
If the model guy got 1.7 FWHR ratio and mine is 1.65 that's pretty good news to me you little shit, isn't it?
 
1.68-1.69.

I redid it using my back camera and got a 1.66
 
Last edited:
If the model guy got 1.7 FWHR ratio and mine is 1.65 that's pretty good news to me you little shit, isn't it?
>Implying a random online app is 100% accurate
 
Did a few more tests, this app is pretty shit/inaccurate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 701
>Implying a random online app is 100% accurate
I really have no clue tbqh. But AI is better than nothing I guess. Very interesting stuff. I hope within the next 5 years we'll have an AI which could calculate such things with 100% precision.
 
I really have no clue tbqh. But AI is better than nothing I guess. Very interesting stuff. I hope within the next 5 years we'll have an AI which could calculate such things with 100% precision.
we already do, this one was just made poorly.
 
Cool. Could you link me to that 100% accurate software then? Could answer some of my questions :)
Probably costs money. I didnt see any other online than the one he posted
 
got 1.62 is that bad or good
 
1.54, it calculates it wrong though, I should have around ~1.75, still low
 
Probably costs money. I didnt see any other online than the one he posted
Does anyone know what software @BeautifulBones uses? Surely it costs money, but I wouldn't mind paying for it as long as it's good enough.
 
1.54, it calculates it wrong though, I should have around ~1.75, still low
It's inconsistent on an individual basis but the ratios are low because it measures the midface height from the top of your eyebrow to ~the middle of your lips.
 
Doesnt ever load shit for me
1.67
 
Last edited:
Got 1.66, tried on Tom Cruise’s pic and he got 1.67
 
I got 1.5

I assume that is bad
 
I got 1.5

I assume that is bad
ye but also irrelevant, it doesn't count it right
1545739811573

1545739826117

1545740435562

you should count it like this

1.80+ is good
1.85+ is ideal

Meeks is 1.90
1545739941900

Barrett is like 2.1
 
Last edited:
Didn't work for me. Here is my pic, can you guys calculate?

1545783911553
 
I got 1.68 with a phone camera pic so it’s a little distorted

This measures from the top of your eyebrows rather than the bottom. Measured from the bottom my fwhr is 2.3
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
7
Views
64
newzealand
N
the_nextDavidLaid
Replies
48
Views
3K
onlyhereforthehair
onlyhereforthehair
irrumator praetor
Replies
25
Views
2K
MoggsWithBoness
MoggsWithBoness
D
Replies
34
Views
4K
applesrgreat
applesrgreat

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top