MedPub scientific article admits blackpill is real, but concludes that blackpillers are too dehumanizing

WhatCommunity

WhatCommunity

improooving
Joined
Jun 28, 2026
Posts
239
Reputation
328
"Indeed, some of the claims incels connect to emerging technology are documented in social science research. Many men are unsuccessful on dating apps (Rudder 2009), there are social biases in favor of attractive people (Dion, Berscheid, and Walster1972), and more men are reporting diminished or absent sexual activity (Ingraham2019). While incels’ observations are accurate, their explanations for these observations are grounded in reductive and dehumanizing descriptions of both men and women."

SOURCE:


article is written in leftist "muh neoliberal capitalism has made us see people as commodity" and "this is patriarchycal noo muh patriarchy" sloppy language, but it begrudgingly admits blackpill and modern dating landscape, although it minimizes how bad things are (like admitting less people have sex, but not saying that number is staggering 60% for young men).
For so many people, analyzing market via objective game theory + supply and demand sense is too low empathy and dehumanizing it seems.

This part was pretty funny though:
"Many men also face similar challenges but do not endorse misogyny."

It's like... yeah they HIDE their feelings because they think simping, appearing as a "good person" is what's gonna make them succeed. (of course ignoring the fact that good person is subjective, as good christian, good atheist, good leftist and good family man are all completely different and mostly incompatible))
Of course in reality only thing that can help you in dating market is ascending via looksmaxxing to hmtn or more, improving your conversational skills, getting in environments where there is more women than men, and therefore where your value increases (by supply and demand).

And trust me, as someone who reads intelligent books (Nassim Taleb, David Graeber, Kafka, Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, etc), cooks well, isn't addict and is generally smart person, the best things I've ever done in increasing dating landscape is looksmaxxing and improving talkativity, not some trashy advice like "have more EQ", "cook", "read books", "get a dog" or "just be a good person bro".
Those are icing on the cake, and if cake is bad (your looks fail you), icing barely matters.
 
You will never comprehend the amount of cope they have
they would never fully accept and deny their claims
 
  • +1
Reactions: rsj, Deleted member 159945 and WhatCommunity
You will never comprehend the amount of cope they have
they would never fully accept and deny their claims
yeah coping is crazy. And this is one of the good articles, maybe because one of three writers is a dude? or because it was written by 3 people, so it had to tone coping down.
I've read some other articles, many of them written by angry women, and they were pure slop that always used "they use junk science" and "they think they don't have agency" claims to dismiss societal problems.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945
yeah coping is crazy. And this is one of the good articles, maybe because one of three writers is a dude? or because it was written by 3 people, so it had to tone coping down.
I've read some other articles, many of them written by angry women, and they were pure slop that always used "they use junk science" and "they think they don't have agency" claims to dismiss societal problems.
No one will deny what they say in their articles, those agencies etc. want the agenda pushed
"junk science" and its just basic dating filters jfl
 
read onloy a bit

this is lookism not blackpill
 
read onloy a bit

this is lookism not blackpill
they touch on everything - inkwells, bp, dating landscape, dating aps, winner-gets-all dating market, etc, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 159945
BUMP
Norman how low
 

Similar threads

vyyavka
Replies
0
Views
21
vyyavka
vyyavka
djl1649
Replies
4
Views
52
djl1649
djl1649
S
Replies
6
Views
85
restinbass
restinbass
klqa
Replies
1
Views
56
klqa
klqa

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top