MedPub scientific article admits blackpill is real, but concludes that blackpillers are too dehumanizing

WhatCommunity

WhatCommunity

🇬🇪 | 5'8 but almost HTN | wise | luckmaxxing
Joined
Jun 28, 2026
Posts
24
Reputation
24
"Indeed, some of the claims incels connect to emerging technology are documented in social science research. Many men are unsuccessful on dating apps (Rudder 2009), there are social biases in favor of attractive people (Dion, Berscheid, and Walster1972), and more men are reporting diminished or absent sexual activity (Ingraham2019). While incels’ observations are accurate, their explanations for these observations are grounded in reductive and dehumanizing descriptions of both men and women."

SOURCE:


article is written in leftist "muh neoliberal capitalism has made us see people as commodity" and "this is patriarchycal noo muh patriarchy" sloppy language, but it begrudgingly admits blackpill and modern dating landscape, although it minimizes how bad things are (like admitting less people have sex, but not saying that number is staggering 60% for young men).
For so many people, analyzing market via objective game theory + supply and demand sense is too low empathy and dehumanizing it seems.

This part was pretty funny though:
"Many men also face similar challenges but do not endorse misogyny."

It's like... yeah they HIDE their feelings because they think simping, appearing as a "good person" is what's gonna make them succeed. (of course ignoring the fact that good person is subjective, as good christian, good atheist, good leftist and good family man are all completely different and mostly incompatible))
Of course in reality only thing that can help you in dating market is ascending via looksmaxxing to hmtn or more, improving your conversational skills, getting in environments where there is more women than men, and therefore where your value increases (by supply and demand).

And trust me, as someone who reads intelligent books (Nassim Taleb, David Graeber, Kafka, Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, etc), cooks well, isn't addict and is generally smart person, the best things I've ever done in increasing dating landscape is looksmaxxing and improving talkativity, not some trashy advice like "have more EQ", "cook", "read books", "get a dog" or "just be a good person bro".
Those are icing on the cake, and if cake is bad (your looks fail you), icing barely matters.
 
You will never comprehend the amount of cope they have
they would never fully accept and deny their claims
 
  • +1
Reactions: rsj, Vireon and WhatCommunity
You will never comprehend the amount of cope they have
they would never fully accept and deny their claims
yeah coping is crazy. And this is one of the good articles, maybe because one of three writers is a dude? or because it was written by 3 people, so it had to tone coping down.
I've read some other articles, many of them written by angry women, and they were pure slop that always used "they use junk science" and "they think they don't have agency" claims to dismiss societal problems.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon
yeah coping is crazy. And this is one of the good articles, maybe because one of three writers is a dude? or because it was written by 3 people, so it had to tone coping down.
I've read some other articles, many of them written by angry women, and they were pure slop that always used "they use junk science" and "they think they don't have agency" claims to dismiss societal problems.
No one will deny what they say in their articles, those agencies etc. want the agenda pushed
"junk science" and its just basic dating filters jfl
 
read onloy a bit

this is lookism not blackpill
 
read onloy a bit

this is lookism not blackpill
they touch on everything - inkwells, bp, dating landscape, dating aps, winner-gets-all dating market, etc, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vireon
BUMP
Norman how low
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
4
Views
65
mtn_dude_193
mtn_dude_193
Ihatemylooks12
Replies
18
Views
162
Absurdist
Absurdist
anthesis
Replies
11
Views
133
LOGIQ
LOGIQ
NarrowBoneMarrow
Replies
9
Views
70
NarrowBoneMarrow
NarrowBoneMarrow

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top