“Men Used to Go to War” and the Inherent Eugenic Nature

[Prøphet]

When a foid sees behavior from a man that she perceives as weak or undesirable, often she’ll throw out the phrase “men used to go to war.” I think it’s interesting how no one has pointed out how eugenic and darwinistic this rhetoric is. What she really means is that if we lived in a time of war, a man like this would never have survived/been born. She’s basically calling out his genetics as weak and saying they would be the first to be filtered out in a time of conflict. The more you really look into these comments and remarks they make, the more you notice the underlying eugenic tones they subconsciously echo.

 

[Prøphet]

Also, if you call out their eugenic behavior and react accordingly (i.e looksmaxxing), these types of people will ironically be the first to call YOU eugenic. There is no winning, because humanity is programmed to hate someone trying to overcome their genes. These people would rather you accept your position as an undesirable, and live an inferior quality of life, than make an effort to change. Animals are inherently eugenic creatures, and the people who refuse to acknowledge how this presents in humanity are actually endorsing it.

 

[Prøphet]

Thoughts?

 

[LefortCandidate]

i ain't dying for no bitch

 

[LTNUser]

These days,you fight with your face and your height

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

Now ,one may find this comparison funny thinking it is bullshit to compare attractive men with kings from the past ,who ruled for years,to attractive men who are liked by a lot of women and earn some money.
This is where they miss the point,where they stop to think more about the topic.
My dear friend, would you rather wish to live a life where you pose in front of a camera to get millions of women calling you attractive or fighting wars to probably get killed by your relatives ?

This should not be a tough choice to make,unless you are some hardcore fan of kings and warriors, who also desires to live life like them where you rule kingdoms, build and expand your empire.

"Build an empire and women will flock to you like months flock to fire "

Notice how they all look dead inside,money isn't gonna make a woman actually like you

@mohi_100 @Ghost Philosophy @swaggers @jaaba

 

[Basin]

These days,you fight with your face and your height

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

Now ,one may find this comparison funny thinking it is bullshit to compare attractive men with kings from the past ,who ruled for years,to attractive men who are liked by a lot of women and earn some money.
This is where they miss the point,where they stop to think more about the topic.
My dear friend, would you rather wish to live a life where you pose in front of a camera to get millions of women calling you attractive or fighting wars to probably get killed by your relatives ?

This should not be a tough choice to make,unless you are some hardcore fan of kings and warriors, who also desires to live life like them where you rule kingdoms, build and expand your empire.

"Build an empire and women will flock to you like months flock to fire "

View attachment 4671457View attachment 4671497View attachment 4671499
Notice how they all look dead inside,money isn't gonna make a woman actually like you

@mohi_100 @Ghost Philosophy @swaggers @jaaba

Fuck she is ugly , so uncanny and unloveable

 

[Basin]

These days,you fight with your face and your height

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

Now ,one may find this comparison funny thinking it is bullshit to compare attractive men with kings from the past ,who ruled for years,to attractive men who are liked by a lot of women and earn some money.
This is where they miss the point,where they stop to think more about the topic.
My dear friend, would you rather wish to live a life where you pose in front of a camera to get millions of women calling you attractive or fighting wars to probably get killed by your relatives ?

This should not be a tough choice to make,unless you are some hardcore fan of kings and warriors, who also desires to live life like them where you rule kingdoms, build and expand your empire.

"Build an empire and women will flock to you like months flock to fire "

View attachment 4671457View attachment 4671497View attachment 4671499
Notice how they all look dead inside,money isn't gonna make a woman actually like you

@mohi_100 @Ghost Philosophy @swaggers @jaaba

If you hang around whores does it even really matter if they actually find you attractive as long as you get what you want from them?

 

[truewarlord]

When a foid sees behavior from a man that she perceives as weak or undesirable, often she’ll throw out the phrase “men used to go to war.” I think it’s interesting how no one has pointed out how eugenic and darwinistic this rhetoric is. What she really means is that if we lived in a time of war, a man like this would never have survived/been born. She’s basically calling out his genetics as weak and saying they would be the first to be filtered out in a time of conflict. The more you really look into these comments and remarks they make, the more you notice the underlying eugenic tones they subconsciously echo.

I live in Austria and stuff like this dosent happen here

does stuff liek this acctually happen in the usa/otehr places?

 

[mohito]

These days,you fight with your face and your height

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

Now ,one may find this comparison funny thinking it is bullshit to compare attractive men with kings from the past ,who ruled for years,to attractive men who are liked by a lot of women and earn some money.
This is where they miss the point,where they stop to think more about the topic.
My dear friend, would you rather wish to live a life where you pose in front of a camera to get millions of women calling you attractive or fighting wars to probably get killed by your relatives ?

This should not be a tough choice to make,unless you are some hardcore fan of kings and warriors, who also desires to live life like them where you rule kingdoms, build and expand your empire.

"Build an empire and women will flock to you like months flock to fire "

View attachment 4671457View attachment 4671497View attachment 4671499
Notice how they all look dead inside,money isn't gonna make a woman actually like you

@mohi_100 @Ghost Philosophy @swaggers @jaaba

Absolutely, no amount of money and status can buy true love and attraction. Nothing, and i mean nothing, feels better than being loved just for your looks

 

[jaaba]

These days,you fight with your face and your height

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

Now ,one may find this comparison funny thinking it is bullshit to compare attractive men with kings from the past ,who ruled for years,to attractive men who are liked by a lot of women and earn some money.
This is where they miss the point,where they stop to think more about the topic.
My dear friend, would you rather wish to live a life where you pose in front of a camera to get millions of women calling you attractive or fighting wars to probably get killed by your relatives ?

This should not be a tough choice to make,unless you are some hardcore fan of kings and warriors, who also desires to live life like them where you rule kingdoms, build and expand your empire.

"Build an empire and women will flock to you like months flock to fire "

View attachment 4671457View attachment 4671497View attachment 4671499
Notice how they all look dead inside,money isn't gonna make a woman actually like you

@mohi_100 @Ghost Philosophy @swaggers @jaaba

Good take, the amount of dopamine and positive social feedback a famous+good looking man gets in the modern era is pretty insane.

 

[Prøphet]

I live in Austria and stuff like this dosent happen here

does stuff liek this acctually happen in the usa/otehr places?

Yeah I’m in the us and foids love to say shit like this casually

 

[Carthaginian]

ok

 

[swaggers]

Guys like Jeremy Meeks and Arshad Chaiwala ,or just any attractive man in general who went viral/became famous because of his face,lived better lives than any king at any point in history

I lowk agree

 

[gunrenaissance]

When a foid sees behavior from a man that she perceives as weak or undesirable, often she’ll throw out the phrase “men used to go to war.” I think it’s interesting how no one has pointed out how eugenic and darwinistic this rhetoric is. What she really means is that if we lived in a time of war, a man like this would never have survived/been born. She’s basically calling out his genetics as weak and saying they would be the first to be filtered out in a time of conflict. The more you really look into these comments and remarks they make, the more you notice the underlying eugenic tones they subconsciously echo.

And women used to stay at home and get raped by their husbands

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

When a foid sees behavior from a man that she perceives as weak or undesirable, often she’ll throw out the phrase “men used to go to war.” I think it’s interesting how no one has pointed out how eugenic and darwinistic this rhetoric is. What she really means is that if we lived in a time of war, a man like this would never have survived/been born. She’s basically calling out his genetics as weak and saying they would be the first to be filtered out in a time of conflict. The more you really look into these comments and remarks they make, the more you notice the underlying eugenic tones they subconsciously echo.

Shit thread that's not what it means

"Men used to go to war" is simply an insult, calling you low T

Whether societal standards, upbringing, or genetics is the core of her statement is not discernable and your claim is empty.

Jfl at believing they think that much about a comment in passing

 

[Prøphet]

Shit thread that's not what it means

"Men used to go to war" is simply an insult, calling you low T

Whether societal standards, upbringing, or genetics is the core of her statement is not discernable and your claim is empty.

Jfl at believing they think that much about a comment in passing

Saying they don’t think that deeply about a casual comment is the same sentiment bluepillers use to try and disprove lookism, like I said the vast majority is subconscious. If you can’t look deeper into the hidden motivations and meanings of this behavior beyond what’s obvious at face value it’s over ngl

And whatever you discern the statement to be founded from, it’s inherently eugenic regardless

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

Saying they don’t think that deeply about a casual comment is the same sentiment bluepillers use to try and disprove lookism, like I said the vast majority is subconscious. If you can’t look deeper into the hidden motivations and meanings of this behavior beyond what’s obvious at face value it’s over ngl

And whatever you discern the statement to be founded from, it’s inherently eugenic regardless

It is not inherently eugenic because you can't assertain if there is any deeper meaning

I just explained this you fucking idiot.

 

[Prøphet]

It is not inherently eugenic because you can't assertain if there is any deeper meaning

I just explained this you fucking idiot.

It’s eugenic because the war zone is the ultimate genetic filtering ground, weeding out the weak from the strong, the casual expression is clearly an allegory for the selection of these inherited qualities, someone seen as effeminate or going against the narrative for example simply doesnt have the genetic qualities that make a “warrior”

 

[Luquier]

It’s eugenic because the war zone is the ultimate genetic filtering ground, weeding out the weak from the strong, the casual expression is clearly an allegory for the selection of these inherited qualities, someone seen as effeminate or going against the narrative for example simply doesnt have the genetic qualities that make a “warrior”

It’s impossible to do anything about this

 

[HeightPilledum]

"men used to go to war"
And foids used to stfu and stay in the kitchen

Also we still do go to war

 

[Prøphet]

It’s impossible to do anything about this

Yeah exactly that’s why it’s eugenic, you either have what it takes to be a man in their eyes or you dont

 

[Luquier]

"men used to go to war"
And foids used to stfu and stay in the kitchen

Also we still do go to war

Men used to rape women in war as well

Capture a village, pick out the cutest foids then run brutal train on those whores with the lads

 

[Deleted member 276814]

They say this phrase when they see guys do things that gives them the "ick" so they inherently just mean that men used to go to war not doing stupid things like what they see the guy doing that gives them the "ick". I've never seen any girl say this when they just see a "weak man"

 

[Prøphet]

They say this phrase when they see guys do things that gives them the "ick" so they inherently just mean that men used to go to war not doing stupid things like what they see the guy doing that gives them the "ick". I've never seen any girl say this when they just see a "weak man"

You’re right I meant more like anything they see as effeminate

You will find nobody more patriarchal than a female

 

[Deleted member 276814]

You’re right I meant more like anything they see as effeminate

You will find nobody more patriarchal than a female

Yes and what they view as "masculine" is just anything that a chad does not actual masculine things

 

[Prøphet]

Yes and what they view as "masculine" is just anything that a chad does not actual masculine things

Yeah and it doesn’t even have to be effeminate, do literally anything that goes against the status quo female empowerment and they’ll call you gay

It’s a deeply pathetic attempt at weaponizing control and power via sexuality

You can be a girl’s girl, but god forbid you say something to justify your identity as a man, then you should be at war

 

[Surfsup]

Nah this is actually a high IQ post

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

It’s eugenic because the war zone is the ultimate genetic filtering ground, weeding out the weak from the strong, the casual expression is clearly an allegory for the selection of these inherited qualities, someone seen as effeminate or going against the narrative for example simply doesnt have the genetic qualities that make a “warrior”

must be satire

 

[Prøphet]

must be satire

You strike me as a deeply unserious person