Midface ratio

[Roge]

Some ratios are changeable, this is practically not.

Whats your guy measurements and thought on ideal range?

I have ≈69mm ipd and ≈64-65mm midface measured by ruler in mirror, measuring pics gives similar results. What tier it makes me?

@thecel

 

[appeal]

this is practically not

how do u plan on changing it

 

[Roge]

how do u plan on changing it

For now I dont cuz from my understanding my ratio is not a failo

 

[appeal]

from my understanding my ratio

everyone says diff from 0.95 being ideal and masc, to 1.1 being ideal cos means ideal forward growth or some shit, depends who you talk to

 

[Roge]

everyone says diff from 0.95 being ideal and masc, to 1.1 being ideal cos means ideal forward growth or some shit, depends who you talk to

Thats why I created thread. I wanna know realistic ideal range. There is consensus on most of the things, how come there isn't on midface ratio

 

[appeal]

Thats why I created thread. I wanna know realistic ideal range. There is consensus on most of the things, how come there isn't on midface ratio

i think that’s the consensus. anywhere between 0.95-1.1 is fine

 

[Roge]

i think that’s the consensus. anywhere between 0.95-1.1 is fine

Thats huge difference. 15%. Millimetres of bone already can truecel you

 

[appeal]

Thats huge difference. 15%. Millimetres of bone already can truecel you

stand alone ratios mean jack shit tbh, depends on other ratios also.

Ideal midface ratio is as close to 1.1:1 as possible

JFL at believing anything as LOW as 1:1 is ok. Minimum is 1.05:1 and 1.1:1 being perfect. That’s what perfect forward growth gets you. Also to debunk some copes: -No, long midface isn’t masculine. No correlation -Just because some good looking people still have a long midface it doesn’t make it...

looksmax.org

Ideal midface ratio is 0.95-1

Obviously 1:1 is commonly seen as the ideal midface ratio, but often people say above 1 is ideal too I have autistically analysed many faces of actors and other famous people at random and almost all of them have a midface ratio below 1. So for males, I believe above 1:1 to be Indian sfs cope...

looksmax.org

 

[shizuku11111]

1.01 mfr

 

[Roge]

stand alone ratios mean jack shit tbh, depends on other ratios also.

Ideal midface ratio is as close to 1.1:1 as possible

JFL at believing anything as LOW as 1:1 is ok. Minimum is 1.05:1 and 1.1:1 being perfect. That’s what perfect forward growth gets you. Also to debunk some copes: -No, long midface isn’t masculine. No correlation -Just because some good looking people still have a long midface it doesn’t make it...

looksmax.org

Ideal midface ratio is 0.95-1

Obviously 1:1 is commonly seen as the ideal midface ratio, but often people say above 1 is ideal too I have autistically analysed many faces of actors and other famous people at random and almost all of them have a midface ratio below 1. So for males, I believe above 1:1 to be Indian sfs cope...

looksmax.org

At the end of the day you still need to know them. Especially this tier of ratio.

The one thing that makes me feel safe is that I'm more on the compact side and kinda in the middle. If I'm wrong with actual measurements then probably I'm still in the "ideal range"

 

[appeal]

At the end of the day you still need to know them. Especially this tier of ratio.

The one thing that makes me feel safe is that I'm more on the compact side and kinda in the middle. If I'm wrong with actual measurements then probably I'm still in the "ideal range"

looksmaxing is basically 90% leanmax, rest is just minor softmaxes. ratios dont matter since unless u gonna hard max, cannot be changed. only ipd can be made to look better imo through eyebrow spacing etc

 

[Roge]

looksmaxing is basically 90% leanmax, rest is just minor softmaxes. ratios dont matter since unless u gonna hard max, cannot be changed. only ipd can be made to look better imo through eyebrow spacing etc

I'm hardmaxing

 

[appeal]

I'm hardmaxing

respect. dont be one of those guys that copes w saying they r gonna hard max then never does anything

 

[Roge]

respect. dont be one of those guys that copes w saying they r gonna hard max then never does anything

I wake up and do everything everyday only to hardmax in the near future

 

[Akhi]

mfr isnt that important, as long as youre in the 0.95-1.05 range

 

[Roge]

mfr isnt that important, as long as youre in the 0.95-1.05 range

6.9 ÷ 6.5 = 1.06

 

[Akhi]

6.9 ÷ 6.5 = 1.06

probably a almost non factor

 

[Roge]

probably a almost non factor

I guess compact is times better than horse

 

[Akhi]

I guess compact is times better than horse

not really

 

[Deleted member 32803]

Some ratios are changeable, this is practically not.

Whats your guy measurements and thought on ideal range?

I have ≈69mm ipd and ≈64-65mm midface measured by ruler in mirror, measuring pics gives similar results. What tier it makes me?

@thecel

Midface ratio isn't as important as .org users think, a longer midface from 0.93 to 1.04 is ideal, with the lower ideal range being more dimorphic for men, closer set eyes are also a dimorphic trait

 

[Roge]

Midface ratio isn't as important as .org users think, a longer midface from 0.93 to 1.04 is ideal, with the lower ideal range being more dimorphic for men, closer set eyes are also a dimorphic trait

Marco "The Ultimate Slayer" Jaric

 

[Roge]

not really

Sounds like a cope slightly

 

[Akhi]

Sounds like a cope slightly

no, too compact is equally if not more shitty for appeal than horse

 

[Deleted member 32803]

Marco "The Ultimate Slayer" Jaric

u r using an extreme outlier example, his ESR is too cooked, his eyes are not one eye apart and his cheeknones aren't proeminent, guys like Del Rio have a taller midface and it looks masculine