Morality Is Ironically Why Society Is Corrupt and Degeneracy is Flourishing

Deleted member 4612

Deleted member 4612

mentally crippled by lonely teen years
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Posts
21,734
Reputation
43,289
The ideal society would be driven primarily by logic. I think the reason society is so immoral is ironically because we are trying to be moral and not logical.

The basis of all laws that are good for a society, is logic.

Take murder for example, the law should not be "you should not kill because its bad/evil", it should be - "you should not kill because you also do not want to be killed". We should hate murder as a society because if we allow other people to kill others haphazardly, then we might be next, sounds fucked up but if society ran on cold logic like that, then everything would be more peaceful.

Basing laws on morality is ironically why society is flawed, its because MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE. Even criminal organizations like the Yakuza or the Italian Mob, etc all have "codes of honour", that are things that even the average citizen would agree with. They have their own set of morals, for example the Mob usually doesn't allow killing women and children, its an emotional and subjective "rule", they have let their emotions create an illogical ruleset, but ironically they can kill men, steal from families, sell drugs, etc.

This is the problem with morals, everybody thinks their moral code is "good enough". If we all had to operate on logic, there is no such thing as "my logic" or "your logic", a choice either is logical or it isn't, logic is based on whats objective, not on how something makes one feel. We need a logical society not a moral one, "true morals" are inherent to logic, because logic usually yields the greatest collective rule set

Imagine how much the rates of rape and human trafficking would go down of prostitution was decriminalized, think about it, its completely illogical that paying for sex is illegal, there's no logical reason why it should be, yet despite all the income it would generate for a country if taxable, despite all the people it would alleviate from suffering, society keeps it illegal due to moral reasoning.

You see that slut on instagram, a lot of you moralfags on this site would say that she is being immoral, but you would be wrong. She doesn't kill, she doesn't steal, she doesn't <insert "bad" thing here>. That's her morals, as far as she's concerned "the times have changed" and she can be a slut and "it isn't hurting anyone". She is completely moral FOR THE ERA SHE EXISTS IN.

Again MORALS ARE SUBJECTIVE, they change from person to person, country to country, era to era. Morals are pointless, we need to be driven by logic not morals, morals can be altered and therefore THEY CAN BE CORRUPTED.

You can't corrupt logic, you can't corrupt objectivity. It always is what its going to be, it will never change, any changes to a law based on logic, will also be logical, but changes to a "moral code" can easily become corrupted.

In fact modern society is the greatest example of this, Christians influenced laws using their moral code, that's why gay marriage was illegal, today morals have been changed due to EMOTIONAL ARGUMENTS. People against gay marriage are seen as "bigots", "evil", etc. Now today gay marriage is legal.

ANY LAW WITH A FOUNDATION BASED ON EMOTION, IS "STRUCTURALLY WEAK" AND CAN BE ALTERED USING EMOTIONS.

MORALS CORRUPT A SOCIETY, THEY DON'T HELP IT
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Butthurt Dweller, Back Alley Boy, Deleted member 9819 and 20 others
I agree but have you seen this GTA 5 graphic mod tho

 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 2968, Deleted member 8576, Butthurt Dweller and 18 others
The ideal society would be driven primarily by logic. I think the reason society is so immoral is ironically because we are trying to be moral and not logical.

The basis of all laws that are good for a society, is logic.

Take murder for example, the law should not be "you should not kill because its bad/evil", it should be - "you should not kill because you also do not want to be killed". We should hate murder as a society because if we allow other people to kill others haphazardly, then we might be next, sounds fucked up but if society ran on cold logic like that, then everything would be more peaceful.

Basing laws on morality is ironically why society is flawed, its because MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE. Even criminal organizations like the Yakuza or the Italian Mob, etc all have "codes of honour", that are things that even the average citizen would agree with. They have their own set of morals, for example the Mob usually doesn't allow killing women and children, its an emotional and subjective "rule", they have let their emotions create an illogical ruleset, but ironically they can kill men, steal from families, sell drugs, etc.

This is the problem with morals, everybody thinks their moral code is "good enough". If we all had to operate on logic, there is no such thing as "my logic" or "your logic", a choice either is logical or it isn't, logic is based on whats objective, not on how something makes one feel. We need a logical society not a moral one, "true morals" are inherent to logic, because logic usually yields the greatest collective rule set

Imagine how much the rates of rape and human trafficking would go down of prostitution was decriminalized, think about it, its completely illogical that paying for sex is illegal, there's no logical reason why it should be, yet despite all the income it would generate for a country if taxable, despite all the people it would alleviate from suffering, society keeps it illegal due to moral reasoning.

You see that slut on instagram, a lot of you moralfags on this site would say that she is being immoral, but you would be wrong. She doesn't kill, she doesn't steal, she doesn't <insert "bad" thing here>. That's her morals, as far as she's concerned "the times have changed" and she can be a slut and "it isn't hurting anyone". She is completely moral FOR THE ERA SHE EXISTS IN.

Again MORALS ARE SUBJECTIVE, they change from person to person, country to country, era to era. Morals are pointless, we need to be driven by logic not morals, morals can be altered and therefore THEY CAN BE CORRUPTED.

You can't corrupt logic, you can't corrupt objectivity. It always is what its going to be, it will never change, any changes to a law based on logic, will also be logical, but changes to a "moral code" can easily become corrupted.

In fact modern society is the greatest example of this, Christians influenced laws using their moral code, that's why gay marriage was illegal, today morals have been changed due to EMOTIONAL ARGUMENTS. People against gay marriage are seen as "bigots", "evil", etc. Now today gay marriage is legal.

ANY LAW WITH A FOUNDATION BASED ON EMOTION, IS "STRUCTURALLY WEAK" AND CAN BE ALTERED USING EMOTIONS.

MORALS CORRUPT A SOCIETY, THEY DON'T HELP IT
This is why nazi germany should have won the war
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8244 and alriodai
Life and this universe have no meaning anyway
 
Life and this universe have no meaning anyway
nigga you were the one arguing god loves incels in my other thread and now you're being a nihilist?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8576, TheChosenChad, alriodai and 3 others
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8576, diggbicc, 5'8manlet and 4 others
I agree but have you seen this GTA 5 graphic mod tho


looks insane but i doubt that next gen will have a texture update similar to that rockstar is too fucking lazy
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: 5'8manlet, alriodai and OgreMaxxing
looks insane but i doubt that next gen will have a texture update similar to that rockstar is too fucking lazy
I want the mod so bad.. It's why I bought GTA on my PC and its behind a fucking paywall. I installed the natural evolved one and it looks nothing like that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
looks insane but i doubt that next gen will have a texture update similar to that rockstar is too fucking lazy
Did you really just say that gorilla
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10172
Laws r not based on morality
 
lots of laws are formed based on perceived morality
I see, but no one actual chooses not to commit crimes because it immoral they don't do it bc..well jail time is no fun
If there was one day u could commit crimes without consequences earth would overflow with blood
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy
I see, but no one actual chooses not to commit crimes because it immoral they don't do it bc..well jail time is no fun
If there was one day u could commit crimes without consequences earth would overflow with blood
i didnt say laws shouldnt exist jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutismMaxing
High iq thread tbh
Cant add much to it so yeah, well done
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6512, Deleted member 9699 and Deleted member 4612
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
High IQ post

agreed with this part especially "Take murder for example, the law should not be "you should not kill because its bad/evil", it should be - "you should not kill because you also do not want to be killed". We should hate murder as a society because if we allow other people to kill others haphazardly, then we might be next, sounds fucked up but if society ran on cold logic like that, then everything would be more peaceful."

People say that we need religion to make sure people don't do shit like committing murder but do we? I think following a logical "put yourself in my shoes" and "treat others like you'd like to be treated" is enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
Very high IQ post. Although its impossible for a society to run purely off logical laws, because peoples emotions and morals are a much stronger driving force then objectivity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6512, 5'8manlet, alriodai and 1 other person
That's nothing new. It's what laws are made for. Everyone has to obey to them, regardless of their religion and personal views. Without it, we'd have complete chaos. Even animals have rules/hierarchy
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai and BigBoy
Morality was always a meme to me, just a way to control people JFL

Kids inherently lie and steal, so that makes them "bad", and if their behavior is uncorrected by adults they will continue to lie and steal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
Smart post. I was going to leave a longer comment but I realized I could make a thread out of it so I'll do that instead of writing it all out here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
I agree.

But a lot if basic laws like "dont kill", "dont steal", "dont rape" are based on logic. You dont kill because if killing is allowed the population will decrease. If stealing is allowed people wont be motivated to produce goods for society. And ig rape is legal a womans agency to choose who she mates with will disappear. And more subhuman genes will be spread leading to a society of dehumanized women and incel children.

Laws were created to address these issues and now we have these rulss in every society. We follow them subconsiously because if we dont human society will fall apart.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
This is why there is Qisas.

In islam when a person kills unlawfully, he is subject to qisas.

This verse sums up your thread;
And there is for you in legal retribution [saving of] life, O you [people] of understanding, that you may become righteous. 2:179


What is qisas?

simply put

“And We ordained therein for them: Life for life, eye for eye”

[al-Maa’idah 5:45].

but its more complicated;
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If a person’s relative is killed, he has the choice of two options: either (the killer) may be killed or the fidyah (ransom, blood money) may be paid.” Agreed upon. Abu Shurayh al-Khuzaa’i said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever is killed or is wounded, has the choice of three things, and if he wants the fourth then restrain him. He may kill (the killer), or forgive him, or take the diyah (blood money). Narrated by Abu Dawood. According to another version: “Whoever has a relative killed after what I have said, his family has two options: to accept the diyah or kill (the killer).” And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There is qisaas for deliberate killing, unless the heir of the slain lets him off.” End quote.

More on this topic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
JFL @ that bullshit. The only thing that begets law is power, and the best thing to do is get people who have the common good in mind into power. The rest is just ceaseless cope argumentation.
Btw you're making a point about logic being the best basis for laws but you're scratching the surface just enough to pretend being smart. If I kill a dude why is it logically wrong may I ask? If I rape why is it logically wrong (lol you'll disagree it's wrong at all but whatever)?
Law is always moral
 
JFL @ that bullshit. The only thing that begets law is power, and the best thing to do is get people who have the common good in mind into power. The rest is just ceaseless cope argumentation.
Btw you're making a point about logic being the best basis for laws but you're scratching the surface just enough to pretend being smart. If I kill a dude why is it logically wrong may I ask? If I rape why is it logically wrong (lol you'll disagree it's wrong at all but whatever)?
Law is always moral
law is always moral? what?

you do realize that laws are constantly changing over time, and many laws contradict other laws, they can't always be moral
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
law is always moral? what?

you do realize that laws are constantly changing over time, and many laws contradict other laws, they can't always be moral
I'm saying you can't make laws based on logic, because laws require a judgment between two options and logic doesn't permit judgment. Laws aren't always objectively moral, but they are always made on a moral basis. You since haven't provided any logic reasoning one could use to make a "logic" law btw.
 
I'm saying you can't make laws based on logic, because laws require a judgment between two options and logic doesn't permit judgment. Laws aren't always objectively moral, but they are always made on a moral basis. You since haven't provided any logic reasoning one could use to make a "logic" law btw.
Imagine how much the rates of rape and human trafficking would go down of prostitution was decriminalized, think about it, its completely illogical that paying for sex is illegal, there's no logical reason why it should be, yet despite all the income it would generate for a country if taxable, despite all the people it would alleviate from suffering, society keeps it illegal due to moral reasoning.
how bout that one
 
u maybe a faggot but i share 100% ur opinion
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612 and WadlowMaxxing
how bout that one
Let me sum up your reasoning
You don't want rape nor human trafficking. So you make prostitution legal because legalising it leads to less rape and human trafficking.
Now why don't you want rape or human trafficking? Is it logical? No it's a moral standpoint.
I could say that legalising prostitution hurts society by lowering interest for marriage. That's a logical proposition. But ultimately what will decide which law passes is the moral weight given to each side.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
Let me sum up your reasoning
You don't want rape nor human trafficking. So you make prostitution legal because legalising it leads to less rape and human trafficking.
Now why don't you want rape or human trafficking? Is it logical? No it's a moral standpoint.
I could say that legalising prostitution hurts society by lowering interest for marriage. That's a logical proposition. But ultimately what will decide which law passes is the moral weight given to each side.
true, good point.

however i think essentially one could weigh the pros/cons of prostitution legalization vs not legalizing is.

originally it was banned in a society where fornication wasn't common. nowadays since fornication is common one would say that also lowers interest for marriage.

also, the moral argument against prostitution was tied to religion, not consequentialism. consequentialism usually involves logic, where as religion is just "because god says so"
 
There is no way to separate morals from logic to begin with, most of your examples imply morals. Why should rape rates go down? Probably because rape is not a good thing, which is a moral assumption.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Matheus and Alexanderr
There is no way to separate morals from logic to begin with, most of your examples imply morals. Why should rape rates go down? Probably because rape is not a good thing, which is a moral assumption.
well, take this for example:
Take murder for example, the law should not be "you should not kill because its bad/evil", it should be - "you should not kill because you also do not want to be killed". We should hate murder as a society because if we allow other people to kill others haphazardly, then we might be next, sounds fucked up but if society ran on cold logic like that, then everything would be more peaceful.
 
well, take this for example:
?
Still we are implying that rape and murder is bad so it should be prevented

If there was no morals a society would not be possible, the reason we live in a society is because: murder is bad, rape is bad, stealing is bad etc so we humans agreed to live together under a certain set of rules to protect us from bad things
 
?
Still we are implying that rape and murder is bad so it should be prevented

If there was no morals a society would not be possible, the reason we live in a society is because: murder is bad, rape is bad, stealing is bad etc so we humans agreed to live together under a certain set of rules to protect us from bad things
rules=laws, not morals.

the problem is something like gay marriage, that is legalized now, because of emotional reasons
 
20210112074501 1

I got it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr
I hate those Thread topics that exceed my IQ
 
rules=laws, not morals.

the problem is something like gay marriage, that is legalized now, because of emotional reasons
No law is based solely on emotional reasons
Gay marriage was prohibited for religious reasons back then, and religion was considered logical by that time

After a long time society evolved enough to find out that religion is flawed, so there is no point in prohibiting gay marriage(in fact keeping it illegal would be actually emotional)
 
No law is based solely on emotional reasons
Gay marriage was prohibited for religious reasons back then, and religion was considered logical by that time

After a long time society evolved enough to find out that religion is flawed, so there is no point in prohibiting gay marriage(in fact keeping it illegal would be actually emotional)
no, there are logical reasons to keep it illegal as well.
 
?
Still we are implying that rape and murder is bad so it should be prevented

If there was no morals a society would not be possible, the reason we live in a society is because: murder is bad, rape is bad, stealing is bad etc so we humans agreed to live together under a certain set of rules to protect us from bad things
Most humans are like sheep, inherently illogical and emotional, this world would require a dictatorship or some kind of artificial intelligence that is used to forumlate laws, then a small group of elected officials who have proven themselves to be logical and emotionally dead will decide which of the AI's decisions works best for society.

We need people who are "emotionally dead" making the decisions, people completely removed from normal thinking.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutismMaxing
true, good point.

however i think essentially one could weigh the pros/cons of prostitution legalization vs not legalizing is.

originally it was banned in a society where fornication wasn't common. nowadays since fornication is common one would say that also lowers interest for marriage.

also, the moral argument against prostitution was tied to religion, not consequentialism. consequentialism usually involves logic, where as religion is just "because god says so"
Yes weighing pros / cons is what you usually do when making new laws, but then again those pros / cons are subjective from the ones in power (their pros might be your cons, as it is now), hence the importance of putting good people in power.
It still implies morality. If you want to use consequentialism as a moral framework go ahead but don't say it's purely logic because it isn't.

Btw "because god says so" built enduring civilisations and ironically with an act of faith provided society with an objective (hence more logic than many counterparts) moral framework
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
What logical reasons?
@bpdandectasy has elabbed on this subject about why society shouldn't accept gays

basically they beg for more and more power and degeneracy
 
@bpdandectasy has elabbed on this subject about why society shouldn't accept gays

basically they beg for more and more power and degeneracy
Society accepts any group of people because they make themselves seem harmless but then they start going haywire and spread degeneracy as soon as soon as society gets comofrtable with them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6475 and Deleted member 4612
Law is always moral
here's a question. if "laws are always moral", shouldn't a law be justified then more the fact that "it's wrong"?
 
I didn't understand the second sentence ngl
if i propose a law and provide reasons why it should be, and my opponent says "no, it's wrong", then that should not be considered
 
if i propose a law and provide reasons why it should be, and my opponent says "no, it's wrong", then that should not be considered
What shouldn’t be considered? The law or your opponent’s objection? I’m having a hard time grasping what you want to get at
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4612
What shouldn’t be considered? The law or your opponent’s objection? I’m having a hard time grasping what you want to get at
if i say

"its wrong because x, y, and z"

and my opponent says

"its wrong because it just is"

shouldnt my opinion win
 
  • +1
Reactions: Matheus

Similar threads

Aladin
Replies
11
Views
209
moredatesmorerapes
moredatesmorerapes
Y
Replies
42
Views
487
Hitlerstopguy05
Hitlerstopguy05
Sloppyseconds
Replies
10
Views
320
whatislovebaby
whatislovebaby
PolisCommov
Replies
16
Views
996
looksmaxxernewbie
looksmaxxernewbie
ilovekolaches
Replies
6
Views
256
reptiles
reptiles

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top