Most annoying user?

[Deleted member 656]

In terms of aesthetics. Race shouldn't interfere. A PSL 4 curry wouldn't be PSL 5 white guy if he magically become blue-eyed and blond-haired. Adding +1 despite the bone structure staying the same just because his coloring is different now doesn't make sense from an objective point of view.

If you had two men who were both 5 PSL, but one was white with brown hair and green eyes, and the other was Asian with black hair and brown eyes, the white one would have more appeal. We know that, it's statistically proven. That's why people use an ethnic penalty, they rate for appeal and not aesthetics.

Also you know very well how important colouring is, especially on ethnics.

 

[Deleted member 1774]

yes comrade

 

[Deleted member 3043]

If you had two men who were both 5 PSL, but one was white with brown hair and green eyes, and the other was Asian with black hair and brown eyes, the white one would have more appeal. We know that, it's statistically proven. That's why people use an ethnic penalty, they rate for appeal and not aesthetics.

Also you know very well how important colouring is, especially on ethnics.

what's your conception of psl ?

 

[Deleted member 656]

what's your conception of psl ?

Somewhere between the two.

 

[Deleted member 1464]

 

[Deleted member 2486]

@Antinous

 

[belnar93]

The most ugly ones imo, they always whine at me.

 

[Deleted member 470]

Somewhere between the two.

I can't seem to decide whether I think PSL should be aesthetics wise only or include appeal. I feel like not including appeal at all into ratings is dumb and naive and misrepresents ratings relative to each other but at the same time I feel like there's SMV as a different term which would include (aesthetics) appeal but also includes stuff like status.

bro momento

 

[medialcanthuscel]

I hate the bluepilled users who in 2019 still think that personality isn't irrilevant with women, or the users who ask for a rate and then insult you just because you rated them low, even if you writed an objective analysis of their features and ratios

 

[Deleted member 656]

I can't seem to decide whether I think PSL should be aesthetics wise only or include appeal. I feel like not including appeal at all into ratings is dumb and naive and misrepresents ratings relative to each other but at the same time I feel like there's SMV as a different term which would include (aesthetics) appeal but also includes stuff like status.

bro momento

That's a question for the high IQ theory-crafting philosophers here

 

[Ritalincel]

I couldn’t give a fuck what someone behind an anonymous identity thinks of me.

 

[fitzgelard]

just registered to say it's mido the slayer