P
pinchfizz1
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2022
- Posts
- 61
- Reputation
- 153
Those considered "chads" outside of the looksmaxx communities aren't facial chads by any means. By facial chads I mean pure dentofacial features, harmony, and growth. "Societal" chads as I'll call them are just HTNs facially with gymmaxxing, tan, tattoos, good hair, facial hair when applicable, good skin, coloring, and phenotype and fashion sense. Of course you don't have to have all of those to be considered "chad" but rather just a couple of them.
This may seem plainly obvious and therefore a useless point to make but the obsession with purely face on these forums is misguided considering the psychosocial impact that growing up exposed to gymmaxxed HTNs through media had on people's definitions of attractiveness.
These definitions of facial aesthetics and real life attractiveness aren't so strongly correlated as a user of these forums might suggest.
As for practical advice, focus on the aforementioned and pay close attention to societies definitions of attractiveness.
And don't try to tell me that biology has a greater impact than societal conditioning on perceived attractiveness, it's flimsy interpretations of a half-baked science (evolutionary psychology)
This may seem plainly obvious and therefore a useless point to make but the obsession with purely face on these forums is misguided considering the psychosocial impact that growing up exposed to gymmaxxed HTNs through media had on people's definitions of attractiveness.
These definitions of facial aesthetics and real life attractiveness aren't so strongly correlated as a user of these forums might suggest.
As for practical advice, focus on the aforementioned and pay close attention to societies definitions of attractiveness.
And don't try to tell me that biology has a greater impact than societal conditioning on perceived attractiveness, it's flimsy interpretations of a half-baked science (evolutionary psychology)