MOST MALES WERE DESIGNED TO DIE

uglynihilist

uglynihilist

Iron
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Posts
241
Reputation
529
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alex569, Deleted member 6572, Deleted member 9852 and 13 others
Water
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: potentialhabit1, Schönling, Norwooder and 4 others
Joined Monday at 4:32 AM
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5746, Schönling, CristianT and 6 others
TLDR but not a bad statement lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765
Joined Monday at 4:32 AM
God I’m leaving the blackpill community if it ever goes mainstream, imagine having to read an essay like this every day in the future, I know I couldn’t lol just look at cuckchan.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 5746, Arkantos and Alt Number 3
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
based venting
 
  • +1
Reactions: BackFromTheMogging
Why are there still subhumans after millions of years of selective pressure?
Is it due to agriculture? enforced monogamy?
Or are there going to be infinity subhumans and a handful of Chads no matter what?
And why is it specific to humans? I don't see many sublion lions or subdolphin dolphins etc...

I need the high iq explanation to this.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8765
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
So basically it goes by this either to get a gf or to die or become a tranny?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8765
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
High iq as fuck

I don't agree with evolution tho, nothing was coincidental in nature but you can alter epigenetic changes within your body through couple of generations.
 
Why are there still subhumans after millions of years of selective pressure?
Is it due to agriculture? enforced monogamy?
Or are there going to be infinity subhumans and a handful of Chads no matter what?
And why is it specific to humans? I don't see many sublion lions or subdolphin dolphins etc...

I need the high iq explanation to this.
There isn't philosophical explanation to this but rather scientifical.

Modern lifestyle has cucked us, diet, without plenty of nutrition you become deformed just like vegans do, because plants don't have fat soluble vitamins and some amino acids. Then you have foods with beta-sitosterol, then you have plastic in food which acts as a endocrine disruptor if you expose them to a newborn. That's why so many teenagers have 6-7'' wrists whereas their parents had 8-9" - this is just an example, i can write a book about how modern lifestyle has cucked us

you could grow up to be 6'5 but because of bad environment and bad parenting, you ended up being 6'.

 
  • +1
Reactions: alex569, Deleted member 6572, Deleted member 8765 and 1 other person
A short balding weak boned dwarf can have 100x more power and survival chances than a huge robust high t chad. Just because the dwarf can speak and organize better with other humans, could he be able to build an army around him. Manipulation and leading skills are 10 times more powerful than simple force or brutality. Survival of the fittest does not mean survival of the most robust and brutal.
Neanderthal humans simply died out because they never developed a proper language and communication skills.

Only because confused and totally irrational girls in 2020 are searching for chads to fulfill their needs, you cant make a science out of it.
Females in history are normally never in the choosing position for their mating partner. Since now girls have the ability to choose guys, everything is going dowhill, and we have this brutal incel situation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NorwoodStyle, Deleted member 6512, Deleted member 9344 and 4 others
Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
Inb4 0

Your theory relates to my hedonism which is self-enlightening in a way basically


 
Ahh yes every great strong society was built on the backs of one Chad hogging all the women to himself,

Monogamous relationships and marriages were only found in Greece, Rome, Great Britain you know the nobodies

What was the name of that Chad society again ?
 
Ahh yes every great strong society was built on the backs of one Chad hogging all the women to himself,

Monogamous relationships and marriages were only found in Greece, Rome, Great Britain you know the nobodies

What was the name of that Chad society again ?
Society is based on compromise so yes, Chad can never monopolize sex because it will be detrimental to any society. Monogamous relationships never exist before Rome and Greece? Interesting lol
 
Society is based on compromise so yes, Chad can never monopolize sex because it will be detrimental to any society. Monogamous relationships never exist before Rome and Greece? Interesting lol
By only I sarcastically meant " only " these great nations, I didnt mean they were the only ones throughout history

Its useless to argue that men are designed to die, because throughout history men also raped women that they conquered over and killed men that might have competed for the rights to reproduce

To say its only natural men are to be cannon fodder in a way to describe modern dating or society just doesnt line up. Plenty of women and children in the past were enslaved or genocided but yet they " shouldnt " be under current laws but yet men should still fulfill their natural cannon fodder role?
 
A short balding weak boned dwarf can have 100x more power and survival chances than a huge robust high t chad. Just because the dwarf can speak and organize better with other humans, could he be able to build an army around him. Manipulation and leading skills are 10 times more powerful than simple force or brutality. Survival of the fittest does not mean survival of the most robust and brutal.
Neanderthal humans simply died out because they never developed a proper language and communication skills.

Only because confused and totally irrational girls in 2020 are searching for chads to fulfill their needs, you cant make a science out of it.
Females in history are normally never in the choosing position for their mating partner. Since now girls have the ability to choose guys, everything is going dowhill, and we have this brutal incel situation.

So if females never practiced choice how do you think sex was distributed? Through rape?

There are 2 reasons why we have this incel situation- easier/safer enviorment and women able to provide for them selves. If you take that away femenism dies out pretty fast. If you go to any place where living conditions are still rough women there are not willing to be strong and independent because that is just suicidal for them. So basically in tough environment women will settle more for less attractive but more protective men meanwhile in the west today women are spoiled with their ability to be independent and thus follow their primal desire for supreme genetics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alex569 and Schizoidcel
By only I sarcastically meant " only " these great nations, I didnt mean they were the only ones throughout history

Its useless to argue that men are designed to die, because throughout history men also raped women that they conquered over and killed men that might have competed for the rights to reproduce

To say its only natural men are to be cannon fodder in a way to describe modern dating or society just doesnt line up. Plenty of women and children in the past were enslaved or genocided but yet they " shouldnt " be under current laws but yet men should still fulfill their natural cannon fodder role?
I don't think you understand why I said that they are cannon fodder. It's biological. Should/shouldn't doesn't mean anything. And I never said men specifically. Males of all species. Due to Females having control over reproduction (most of the time) they are basically a filter and males are those who compete in order to get through this filter and reproduce. And a lot of them never did. I believe it's less prominent in humans but still studies showed that we have twice as much female ancestors that males. Meaning on average 1 reproduced with 2 females historically.
 
What does it matter to you personally tho, op?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Arkantos and Bewusst
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
All humans are designed to die period
 
80% of males are destined to rope eventually with hypergamy, soon to be 99% in 2030 when males become completely obsolete which is their goal.
 
Last edited:
Why do we have sex? Have you ever asked yourself this question? Why do we have sexes. Why is there a male and a female. Why can't life replicate itself without having males? Those are all legit questions but people rarely ask them. We see ourselves and other advanced forms of life all having sex in one form or another in order to reproduce. But truth is - sex hasn't always been around.

There is a lot of primitive forms of life that don't need sex to reproduce. They do it asexually. If you look at the basis of everything that life is- a cell. It multiplies itself without having a male partner or any form of sexual intercourse so it leads us to one simple realization. Life doesn't require sexual reproduction. Advanced life on the other side does.
It is not a secret that all this variety of living beings didn't just appear out of nowhere. Nor it was designed by someone's consciousness. It is just a result of a process called evolution. And what are the requirements for evolution to occur?

3 things
Reproduction
Variation
Selective Pressure


So when you have a population of living beings in order to start the process of evolution they have to start to reproduce sexually. Sexual reproduction is what secures both Variation (due to recombination of genes) and Selective pressure (due to selective nature of females).
Basically the only reason why we evolved to what we are now is because for millions of years countless males died without reproducing. They went extinct without passing their genes. Males in a way are designed to be like cannon fodder. An expendable material that fuels evolution:blackpill:. Because whole system is designed in a way that those who are weak and unfit should die out and those who are superior will have the most access to reproduction thus pushing species towards better fitness and genetic value.
Tbh don't care about reproduction, who even does nowadays? Even females aren't reproducing, birth rates are plummeting. Even longer term relationships are borderline impossible.
What I want is to be happy and be appreciated for who I am, for what I do, someone to understand my worth and meaning. Fuck reproduction, biggest scam you could involve yourself in.
Why is it impossible just to be together with another person and enjoy each others company and nurture each other?
If I ever ascend, one thing I'm very much so afraid of is, how fake it'd all be for my very own self being, if the only reason another person would want to be in my company, is because I faked it till I made it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6512 and Arkantos
I wanna join the DDR army and die fighting some dirty capitalist pigs
 
this greycel discovered darwins theory 200 years late and everybody is surprised
 
A short balding weak boned dwarf can have 100x more power and survival chances than a huge robust high t chad. Just because the dwarf can speak and organize better with other humans, could he be able to build an army around him. Manipulation and leading skills are 10 times more powerful than simple force or brutality. Survival of the fittest does not mean survival of the most robust and brutal.
Neanderthal humans simply died out because they never developed a proper language and communication skills.

Only because confused and totally irrational girls in 2020 are searching for chads to fulfill their needs, you cant make a science out of it.
Females in history are normally never in the choosing position for their mating partner. Since now girls have the ability to choose guys, everything is going dowhill, and we have this brutal incel situation.
High iq as fuck, glad to read some knowledge sometimes.
 
So if females never practiced choice how do you think sex was distributed? Through rape?

There are 2 reasons why we have this incel situation- easier/safer enviorment and women able to provide for them selves. If you take that away femenism dies out pretty fast. If you go to any place where living conditions are still rough women there are not willing to be strong and independent because that is just suicidal for them. So basically in tough environment women will settle more for less attractive but more protective men meanwhile in the west today women are spoiled with their ability to be independent and thus follow their primal desire for supreme genetics.
Hypergamy never intended women to have 5000 men at swipe of her fingers, or to have contraceptives.
We are making ourselves obsolete but it's the man's fault, we are making it too easy for women to have sex without ripercussions, that's why they push for abortion, they don't want to be slut shamed, contraceptives, hook up culture and open relationships.
They basically are becoming like men, but with way higher standards.
Back in the days if she fucked Chad and people knew she was socially dead, we men became weak and let them being ok with being single mothers, or with having multiple sexual partners, just because we hope that she would give us some pussy.
We are at fault, because if we organize and decide that promiscuous women and men should be left out then society would flourish again, but we don't want to, we hope to be the winner out of 99 other men. This forum is basically that, looksmaxxing, so you can win on other men and take all the women, we are as degenerate as the women we criticize, they just can act on their desire while we can't.
 
Why are there still subhumans after millions of years of selective pressure?
Is it due to agriculture? enforced monogamy?
Or are there going to be infinity subhumans and a handful of Chads no matter what?
And why is it specific to humans? I don't see many sublion lions or subdolphin dolphins etc...

I need the high iq explanation to this.
jews
 
Well that's not always the case, traits selected by females can be advantageous to the species but not always as females can just select for "pretty features" instead of actual traits to help a species survive and advance (sexual selection).

For instance, females as of right now select for height, face and frame but are those traits really going to advance the species? Probably not, considering a 180 IQ nerd "subhuman" would probably do more for it than a 6'7 gigachad playing rugby yet we both know who'd get more pussy.

Inb4 some fag here mentions "b-b-but facial attractiveness correlates with IQ".
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 10536 and Deleted member 6512
Well that's not always the case, traits selected by females can be advantageous to the species but not always as females can just select for "pretty features" instead of actual traits to help a species survive and advance (sexual selection).

For instance, females as of right now select for height, face and frame but are those traits really going to advance the species? Probably not, considering a 180 IQ nerd "subhuman" would probably do more for it than a 6'7 gigachad playing rugby yet we both know who'd get more pussy.

Inb4 some fag here mentions "b-b-but facial attractiveness correlates with IQ".
Facial attractivness correlates with iq is gigacope, probably teachers were under the halo effect when gl people took those tests.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xander578
Facial attractivness correlates with iq is gigacope, probably teachers were under the halo effect when gl people took those tests.
It wouldn't matter anyway jfl, we have tests to determine this way more accurately so it makes little sense to judge intellect based on looks.
 
Well that's not always the case, traits selected by females can be advantageous to the species but not always as females can just select for "pretty features" instead of actual traits to help a species survive and advance (sexual selection).

For instance, females as of right now select for height, face and frame but are those traits really going to advance the species? Probably not, considering a 180 IQ nerd "subhuman" would probably do more for it than a 6'7 gigachad playing rugby yet we both know who'd get more pussy.

Inb4 some fag here mentions "b-b-but facial attractiveness correlates with IQ".
True and it'd be all nice and dandy, but when you give literal toddlers/kids such an insane power i.e. the entire future of the civilisation, surely nothing good is going to come out of that. Everything is so fucked.
Females aren't based on rationality and giving them the decision to make the rational choice is literally just asking for fucking my shit up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xander578 and Deleted member 6512
Well that's not always the case, traits selected by females can be advantageous to the species but not always as females can just select for "pretty features" instead of actual traits to help a species survive and advance (sexual selection).

For instance, females as of right now select for height, face and frame but are those traits really going to advance the species? Probably not, considering a 180 IQ nerd "subhuman" would probably do more for it than a 6'7 gigachad playing rugby yet we both know who'd get more pussy.

Inb4 some fag here mentions "b-b-but facial attractiveness correlates with IQ".
It doesn't always help to advance. Look at peacocks. Their tail is completely useless for survival and might be even affecting it in a negative way. Some female desires doesn't make any logical sense. The best explanation that I've found was that having some crazy exotic attributes like peacock's tail might be a good signal for females that he is high quality male because he was able to actually survive with this shit on him.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaia262 and Deleted member 6512
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 8365

Similar threads

vratisevojvodo
Blackpill Mutual Attraction
Replies
32
Views
1K
LVZZO
LVZZO
vratisevojvodo
Replies
40
Views
2K
os_cria
os_cria
ElySioNs
Replies
2
Views
168
Mkhzee
Mkhzee

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top