Muh biology

D

Deleted member 4362

⠀ ⠀
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Posts
31,022
Reputation
36,190
I got in a heated argument with a friend. We talked about platonic friendships with women and objectification, but he kept saying how you cannot “take the biology away from men” and how most men will choose to have sex with all of their women friends if given the chance.

He chooses to objectify women constantly and reduce them to body parts as a part of “biology”. He said that this was biology and mentioned his disappointment in how he will become friends with women and they immediately “friendzone” him.

I brought up points about how that’s incorrect based on female biology, cultural impact/widespread, an excuse used to justify sexual assault/rape, and it reduces women to their body parts and assuming you are owed sex/they should serve you as your role of a man. There have been many studies that show the “spread your seed” and men “need to sexualize women” is false.

Humans would not be where we are now if we did not evolve into a civilized race with moral compasses and self-control. The “biology” argument is one of the most basic arguments that is used to describe monkeys and procreation.

People are not monkeys. Women’s fertile windows, psychology, and human monogamy have disapproved or changed the “you can’t take biology away from men” narrative.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15827, FailedNormieManlet and Toth's thot
Dnrd, NT > looks , VIP > looks
 
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Dystopian, Deleted member 18244 and FailedNormieManlet

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
20
Views
1K
disillusioned
disillusioned
BigJimsWornOutTires
Replies
7
Views
310
BigJimsWornOutTires
BigJimsWornOutTires
Sloppyseconds
Replies
14
Views
905
LooksmaxxHopeful
LooksmaxxHopeful
yandex99
Replies
8
Views
1K
Maalik
Maalik

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top