Muh biology

D

Deleted member 4362

⠀ ⠀
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Posts
30,996
Reputation
36,320
I got in a heated argument with a friend. We talked about platonic friendships with women and objectification, but he kept saying how you cannot “take the biology away from men” and how most men will choose to have sex with all of their women friends if given the chance.

He chooses to objectify women constantly and reduce them to body parts as a part of “biology”. He said that this was biology and mentioned his disappointment in how he will become friends with women and they immediately “friendzone” him.

I brought up points about how that’s incorrect based on female biology, cultural impact/widespread, an excuse used to justify sexual assault/rape, and it reduces women to their body parts and assuming you are owed sex/they should serve you as your role of a man. There have been many studies that show the “spread your seed” and men “need to sexualize women” is false.

Humans would not be where we are now if we did not evolve into a civilized race with moral compasses and self-control. The “biology” argument is one of the most basic arguments that is used to describe monkeys and procreation.

People are not monkeys. Women’s fertile windows, psychology, and human monogamy have disapproved or changed the “you can’t take biology away from men” narrative.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15827, Deleted member 15674 and Toth's thot
Dnrd, NT > looks , VIP > looks
 
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Dystopian, Deleted member 18244 and Deleted member 15674

Similar threads

loneiqlet
Replies
12
Views
115
Ted Bundy
Ted Bundy
Q
Replies
6
Views
56
Baeseth
Baeseth
g4rlic
Replies
2
Views
26
g4rlic
g4rlic
j1gga
Replies
1
Views
34
j1gga
j1gga
Anatole
Replies
4
Views
47
prometheus*
prometheus*

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top