Muscles and height is so important

D

Deleted member 5393

Fuchsia
Joined
Feb 21, 2020
Posts
14,935
Reputation
23,813
908F659A F377 44AD BBBB 8452BBCB9EB3

every user ive seen on this website has a pathetic body.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: godlikesz, MusicMaxxingMidget, Htobrother and 1 other person
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MusicMaxxingMidget, Kingkellz, randomguy1235 and 1 other person
giphy.gif
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: godlikesz, Deleted member 6824, Deleted member 6305 and 3 others
Keep sucking on Norwood Murphy's tiny balls
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Mateusz74, Deleted member 3556, RAITEIII and 2 others
Body is more important than height unless ur a manlet. almost no guy has a good body so u stick out from the crowd and get niche appeal

also u mog everyone because they know u can kill them in 1 punch

But can they? "Big muscles" doesn't mean "good fighter." In fact, it usually means you'll get exhausted before the other guy. That's why MMA/UFC fighters aren't aesthetic. Why boxers aren't aesthetic. They need that crucial, crucial body fat to keep them going.

1589732338032


Also, who is that short guy and why would he agree to be in a Connor Murphy video? Connor Murphy is a notorious narcissist who gets off on cucking other men.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, MusicMaxxingMidget, Deleted member 5258 and 3 others
Nick Batemans body is ideal. Looks strong and big not too bulky or skinny even though his frame is nothing special
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: godlikesz, Kade and Deleted member 5393
Nick Batemans body is ideal. Looks strong and big not too bulky or skinny even though his frame is nothing special
nah his chest and arms are weak but his shoulder width is ideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1751
nah his chest and arms are weak but his shoulder width is ideal
Just do lateral raise and neck raise bro 😅
But can they? "Big muscles" doesn't mean "good fighter." In fact, it usually means you'll get exhausted before the other guy. That's why MMA/UFC fighters aren't aesthetic. Why boxers aren't aesthetic. They need that crucial, crucial body fat to keep them going.

View attachment 411444

Also, who is that short guy and why would he agree to be in a Connor Murphy video? Connor Murphy is a notorious narcissist who gets off on cucking other men.
Short guy thinking: Man ,this Connor guy is so nice despite being famous and all. He insisted me to stand in middle of the frame

Cucknor Murphy: Fool doesn't know I'm mogging you in front of millions
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
Somebody should will try find a more insecure user here, who is concerned about the masculinity of today's men jfl.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
Atlantid face >>>>>>> muscles,height
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
after 6'0 height is cope
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: CrazyFitLover, Subhuman Philtrum, Deleted member 2486 and 1 other person
But can they? "Big muscles" doesn't mean "good fighter." In fact, it usually means you'll get exhausted before the other guy. That's why MMA/UFC fighters aren't aesthetic. Why boxers aren't aesthetic. They need that crucial, crucial body fat to keep them going.

View attachment 411444

Also, who is that short guy and why would he agree to be in a Connor Murphy video? Connor Murphy is a notorious narcissist who gets off on cucking other men.

Biggest bullshit I've ever heard in my entire life. One look at fighters such as prime Mike Tyson, Alistair Overeem(had one of the most aesthetic builds during his roided prime),Jon Jones, Conor Mcgregor, Anthony Joshua, Deontay Wilder, The Klitschko brothers, and many,many other extradionary fighters have top tier physiques for their weight class.Even fat twats like Andy Ruiz or Mike Hunt have a decent amount of muscle on them, it's just hidden under layers upon layers of fat.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Subhuman Philtrum and randomguy1235
If you are 6 ft 3 and have a good body.
In 90% of cases you win
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5393
You have to be at least lean to get any women. Muscles are a bonus. If you have a shit body aka too high body fat, your are fucking yourself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and Kade
Used to think this but then I got facially mogged by a pretty shorter boy its about balance
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
Biggest bullshit I've ever heard in my entire life. One look at fighters such as prime Mike Tyson, Alistair Overeem(had one of the most aesthetic builds during his roided prime),Jon Jones, Conor Mcgregor, Anthony Joshua, Deontay Wilder, The Klitschko brothers, and many,many other extradionary fighters have top tier physiques for their weight class.Even fat twats like Andy Ruiz or Mike Hunt have a decent amount of muscle on them, it's just hidden under layers upon layers of fat.

But is this really "aesthetic?"

1589734232770


I mean he's definitely got muscle, it's just he's also got fat. About as much fat as he has muscle.
 
Body is more important than height unless ur a manlet. almost no guy has a good body so u stick out from the crowd and get niche appeal

also u mog everyone because they know u can kill them in 1 punch
Yuyevon is right.
I read research about this, even.

The research says imo basically;
tl;dr.
-In body: Body strength makes you most attractive in general (80%) -> aka muscle mass, in general (this does have some correlation with height actually imo, since taller = more potential for strength/muscle mass)
-In body: height (on it's own) adds limited increase to being more attractive in general (10%) -> but still it does add some (10%)
-Height doesn't add much extra points on it's own (10%); BUT will be used as a rejection criteria (aka, manlet = game over. So in that sense, height can mean getting -100% downvote in attractiveness). Height is more of a rjection criteria then an attarictiveness increase criteria (some, but also a bit limited)

Study
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819

What matters most. Strength or Height?
Quotes from study 2:
"Ratings of strength are a robust and much larger predictor of attractiveness than either height or weight."
"Height is attractive even independent of making a man look strong."


They say, in study:
80% of Body attractiveness = strength + height.
And 70% of Body attractiveness = strength.
And 10% of Body attractiveness = height.

Here's another study saying body shape>height>penis size

1580812117091.png





What they imo often fail to see, a bit in studies. Is that Body shape and Height are somewhat correlated.
When you are tall, you can create more muscles mass. And due to longer upper body, you have more potential to created that V-shape then when shorter.

So, imo.
It should be like this:
Body Shape: 60%
Height: 25%


 
  • +1
Reactions: SMVbender, Baldingman1998, Deleted member 5393 and 1 other person
But is this really "aesthetic?"

View attachment 411494

I mean he's definitely got muscle, it's just he's also got fat. About as much fat as he has muscle.
You must be severely mentally stunted if you consider someone with such a physique to have an equal amount of muscle and fat- He's like 220-225 lbs in the pic @5'10 and he is FAIRLY lean(no more than 15% bf), 99% of people at this weight/height combination are either fat sacks of shit(well over 25%) if natty or on a decent amount of gear if they're lean.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Subhuman Philtrum
You must be severely mentally stunted if you consider someone with such a physique to have an equal amount of muscle and fat- He's like 220-225 lbs in the pic @5'10 and he is FAIRLY lean(no more than 15% bf), 99% of people at this weight/height combination are either fat sacks of shit(well over 25%) if natty or on a decent amount of gear if they're lean.

But you can go on r/Fitness and find a thousand dudes who look like this. Might be different heights though. Is the look itself aesthetic?
 
But you can go on r/Fitness and find a thousand dudes who look like this. Might be different heights though. Is the look itself aesthetic?
"But you can go on r/tall and find a thousand 6'4 dudes(99th percentile)..." No shit you'll find people with top percentile traits on subs dedicated to showing them off. Mike Tyson is about 10x more aesthetic compared to the average man on the street, even though he is of average height, his build would definitely make him stand out simply due to the fact that very few are this jacked. And yes, he looks fairly aesthetic.
 
But you can go on r/Fitness and find a thousand dudes who look like this.
In real life though, it's said (and I think is true) rare to see this.
Obviously you will see alot of this on r/fitness. Because only the small amount of people that can show off their 6-pack body will do so, and they all unite in such places/forums.

In real life though.
It's commonly stated (I can't find source), that in USA only 1 in 20.000 - 25.000 has good visibele abbs.
Which makes it more rare, then being a millionare.

To have nice/good visible abbs, you need;
* below 15% bodyfat
* good amount of muscle mass.

You must be severely mentally stunted if you consider someone with such a physique to have an equal amount of muscle and fat- He's like 220-225 lbs in the pic @5'10 and he is FAIRLY lean(no more than 15% bf), 99% of people at this weight/height combination are either fat sacks of shit(well over 25%) if natty or on a decent amount of gear if they're lean.
Agreed. Mike Tyson is in that pic around 15% bodyfat range. His abbs are just slightly visible. For boxiing/fighting, you don't need to be below 15% bodyfat perse at all.
 
Last edited:
In real life though, it's said (and I think is true) rare to see this.
Obviously you will see alot of this on r/fitness. Because only the small amount of people that can show off their 6-pack body will do so, and they all unite in such places/forums.

In real life though.
It's commonly stated (I can't find source), that in USA only 1 in 20.000 - 25.000 has good visibele abbs.
Which makes it more rare, then being a millionare.

To have nice/good visible abbs, you need;
* below 15% bodyfat
* good amount of muscle mass.


Agreed. Mike Tyson is in that pic around 15% bodyfat range. His abbs are just slightly visible. For boxiing/fighting, you don't need to be below 15% bodyfat perse at all.
Wait its more rare to have abs than be a millionaire!? shitt can i trade!?
 
Abs is important but doesnt matter with clothes. Arms chest traps delts are everything
 
  • +1
Reactions: eduardkoopman
"But you can go on r/tall and find a thousand 6'4 dudes(99th percentile)..." No shit you'll find people with top percentile traits on subs dedicated to showing them off. Mike Tyson is about 10x more aesthetic compared to the average man on the street, even though he is of average height, his build would definitely make him stand out simply due to the fact that very few are this jacked. And yes, he looks fairly aesthetic.

I don't think people on Reddit are top percentile. I think the lifters on Reddit look like most lifters, period. And lifters themselves don't seem to be that special.

In real life though.
It's commonly stated (I can't find source), that in USA only 1 in 20.000 - 25.000 has good visibele abbs.
Which makes it more rare, then being a millionare.

That cannot be real. How are we defining "visible?" Because if you're talking "visible" like in that picture of Tyson, that would mean only 15,000 Americans have abs like that. And I cannot... I mean, no way.

But if you meant single-digit "so lean you can roll marbles between their ab insertions" yeah, I believe that.
 
But is this really "aesthetic?"

View attachment 411494

I mean he's definitely got muscle, it's just he's also got fat. About as much fat as he has muscle.
Are you trolling? He has the perfect body and proportions. Literally signals to every foid he can and will do what he wants to whoever he wants
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and Deleted member 5393
Are you trolling? He has the perfect body and proportions. Literally signals to every foid he can and will do what he wants to whoever he wants

I don't think it is. I think people like a v-taper, I think people like a slender waist and wide shoulders.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5393
Are you trolling? He has the perfect body and proportions. Literally signals to every foid he can and will do what he wants to whoever he wants
Bullshit he doesnt have the perfect body or even close lmfao
 
@jefferson @ChadKahn @BigBiceps
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigBiceps
I genuinely look so much better after letting the roid bloat clear out of my system. Good lighting abs at 16-18% bf was something I had never thought possible on my frame. I used to need 13-15% bf to have good lighting abs. Roids are wonderful. Especially tren. Tren is the blood of Mars.
 
@KingOfRome post body pic then
 
height and frame
not muscles
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5393
@KingOfRome post body pic then
Publicly? After making dozens of posts admitting to possessing and using schedule 3 controlled substances? I'm not risking prison to win internet points dude.
 
But can they? "Big muscles" doesn't mean "good fighter." In fact, it usually means you'll get exhausted before the other guy. That's why MMA/UFC fighters aren't aesthetic. Why boxers aren't aesthetic. They need that crucial, crucial body fat to keep them going.

View attachment 411444

Also, who is that short guy and why would he agree to be in a Connor Murphy video? Connor Murphy is a notorious narcissist who gets off on cucking other men.
Lifefuel for me because I'm as tall as Connor Murphy. That means those people would look like midgets next to me.
 
Post pic of just ur body

Frame means shit without muscles
My body has several identifying marks. Mainly scars. Including a surgical scar around my navel.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5393
there is a problem for some ppl
its called sex drive
who cares if i have low bf if im 0 interested to women?
you either ecto or cheater or dont bother
 
RTT theory if you are 6' and average or higher facially = slayer.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5393
I
But can they? "Big muscles" doesn't mean "good fighter." In fact, it usually means you'll get exhausted before the other guy. That's why MMA/UFC fighters aren't aesthetic. Why boxers aren't aesthetic. They need that crucial, crucial body fat to keep them going.

View attachment 411444

Also, who is that short guy and why would he agree to be in a Connor Murphy video? Connor Murphy is a notorious narcissist who gets off on cucking other men.
That mog is always brutal no matter how many times I see it
 
Face>Hair>Height>Muscle mass
If you lack the first 3 then yes you should 100% musclemax and go for stripper type sluts
muscles are more important than height unless ur a manlet. Also hair is a part of face.

tons of tall guys but no guy with a fitness model body. Its simple demand and supply.

im 6ft3 so i speak from experience.
 
muscles are more important than height unless ur a manlet. Also hair is a part of face.

tons of tall guys but no guy with a fitness model body. Its simple demand and supply.

im 6ft3 so i speak from experience.

Have your results with girls changed since adding mass?
 
I used to have a fairly reasonable body.

Currently en-route to bringing it back
View attachment 411434
every user ive seen on this website has a pathetic body.

It's real, but know that Conor Murphy pays all these girls to react in such ways. Well most of them.
 
Body is more important than height unless ur a manlet. almost no guy has a good body so u stick out from the crowd and get niche appeal

also u mog everyone because they know u can kill them in 1 punch
bullshit

body is meaningless under 6'0 or 5'11 at least

nobody cares about a ripped manlet
after 6'0 height is cope
maybe in 1980 my friend
But is this really "aesthetic?"

View attachment 411494

I mean he's definitely got muscle, it's just he's also got fat. About as much fat as he has muscle.
he is just plain ugly
body doesnt halo him enough
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

valentine
Replies
12
Views
87
TheAncientMacedonia
T
7nclave
Replies
1
Views
24
Diddihippi09
Diddihippi09
epic09
Replies
15
Views
49
kimorishi
kimorishi
TheImmortalBeauty
Replies
10
Views
44
kisslessvirgin
kisslessvirgin
lumified
Replies
1
Views
24
lumified
lumified

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top