My Experience as a Dalit Woman Navigating Dating in India.

Not really only Jats and Rors. Dogras, Kashmiris, Punjabi Brahmins, Pahadis don't.
You don't know much since you aren't rom the north, there blood exist in all north Indians.
 
Hardly, they arrived in India over 2,700 years ago, all north Indians have scythian blood in them. Many local practices were influenced by them.
Also non-jatt rajasthanis also don't have any Scythian blood.
 
You don't know much since you aren't rom the north, there blood exist in all north Indians.
How do u know I'm not from the North? I am. I've done my research no significant genetic proof of Scythians exist in other North Indians. Only Jatts and Rors have, also how tf will I not understand, does every North Indian say I am scythian by birth ask ur neighbours and people on the street they won't have a clue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Also non-jatt rajasthanis also don't have any Scythian blood.
Rajasthan is very massive, it isn't considered a north Indian state either, the rajputs in all of north India have connection with the scythian people.
 
Rajasthan is very massive, it isn't considered a north Indian state either, the rajputs in all of north India have connection with the scythian people.
I'll give u a list, Jatts, Rors, Rajputs, Arora, Khatri.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
How do u know I'm not from the North? I am. I've done my research no significant genetic proof of Scythians exist in other North Indians. Only Jatts and Rors have, also how tf will I not understand, does every North Indian say I am scythian by birth ask ur neighbours and people on the street they won't have a clue.
The steppe blood in north Indians shares a direct connection with them, yeah most north Indians won't be aware of that, but it is there.
 
Shah Rukh Khan Jaihind GIF by Red Chillies Entertainment
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Rajasthan is very massive, it isn't considered a north Indian state either, the rajputs in all of north India have connection with the scythian people.
This is very pseudo scientific, u probably have 0% Scythian DNA, even less steppe DNA. A lot of genetic change didn't happen in Pahari areas excluding Dogras, because of mountains. Unless ur a Brahmin, or Rajput most Pahadis are light skinned not because of Steppe DNA but because of less Adivasi DNA AND Tibetan DNA. Even Rajastan and Himachal Rajputs are different. Rajputs from Himachal have less Scythian DNA.
 
This is very pseudo scientific, u probably have 0% Scythian DNA, even less steppe DNA. A lot of genetic change didn't happen in Pahari areas excluding Dogras, because of mountains. Unless ur a Brahmin, or Rajput most Pahadis are light skinned not because of Steppe DNA but because of less Adivasi DNA AND Tibetan DNA. Even Rajastan and Himachal Rajputs are different. Rajputs from Himachal have less Scythian DNA.
My family migrated from rajasthan about 800 years ago, dogras are kashmiri, not really pahadi. Himachali's score fairly high in steppe ancestry though, so that is straight up bs on your part, and yes i am a rajput.
 
My family migrated from rajasthan about 800 years ago, dogras are kashmiri, not really pahadi. Himachali's score fairly high in steppe ancestry though, so that is straight up bs on your part, and yes i am a rajput.
No Pahadis actually score low on steppe Ancestry. Only like 15-20% like BIMARU states. Only Punjab, Haryana have significant steppe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
My family migrated from rajasthan about 800 years ago, dogras are kashmiri, not really pahadi. Himachali's score fairly high in steppe ancestry though, so that is straight up bs on your part, and yes i am a rajput.
Rajputs may score higher though like 20-30%.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
No Pahadis actually score low on steppe Ancestry. Only like 15-20% like BIMARU states. Only Punjab, Haryana have significant steppe.
This is some bs, a lot of phadi have significant admixture from punjab and rajasthan, and can score anywhere from 20-45, depending on the region. Most have high Zagros(IVC) combined with low aasi at around 15-20%, it's the zagros ancestry and steppe blood which makes some pahadi lighter skinned and some times coloured eyes.
 
This is some bs, a lot of phadi have significant admixture from punjab and rajasthan, and can score anywhere from 20-45, depending on the region. Most have high Zagros(IVC) combined with low aasi at around 15-20%, it's the zagros ancestry and steppe blood which makes some pahadi lighter skinned and some times coloured eyes.
It's true, u can search it up urself. Or use population genetics sites. Anyways I don't think u should mind anyways, ur a Rajput 20-30% steppe. Also no it definitely won't go higher than 35% over 25-30% is rare too almost none.
 
This is some bs, a lot of phadi have significant admixture from punjab and rajasthan, and can score anywhere from 20-45, depending on the region. Most have high Zagros(IVC) combined with low aasi at around 15-20%, it's the zagros ancestry and steppe blood which makes some pahadi lighter skinned and some times coloured eyes.
Not steppe blood but lack of aasi and significance of Tibetan genes.
 
This is some bs, a lot of phadi have significant admixture from punjab and rajasthan, and can score anywhere from 20-45, depending on the region. Most have high Zagros(IVC) combined with low aasi at around 15-20%, it's the zagros ancestry and steppe blood which makes some pahadi lighter skinned and some times coloured eyes.
In pahadi rajputs yes steppe blood makes an impact.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
This is some bs, a lot of phadi have significant admixture from punjab and rajasthan, and can score anywhere from 20-45, depending on the region. Most have high Zagros(IVC) combined with low aasi at around 15-20%, it's the zagros ancestry and steppe blood which makes some pahadi lighter skinned and some times coloured eyes.
Lmao this conversation went through like 3-5 phases and discussions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Not steppe blood but lack of aasi and significance of Tibetan genes.
Hardley, tibetens are landlocked up in the northern provinces, i have no tibeten blood same goes for most of the very light skin people i know. It's mostly zagros and low aasi, and some sexual selection or lighter skin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skullmaxxer
Hardley, tibetens are landlocked up in the northern provinces, i have no tibeten blood same goes for most of the very light skin people i know. It's mostly zagros and low aasi, and some sexual selection or lighter skin.
U probably do like 10-15% Tibetan blood is present in Pahadis on average.
 
It's true, u can search it up urself. Or use population genetics sites. Anyways I don't think u should mind anyways, ur a Rajput 20-30% steppe. Also no it definitely won't go higher than 35% over 25-30% is rare too almost none.
Researches are not always accurate man, and in some isolated groups it can go as high as 40% although as you said it is very rare, but it does exist.
 
U probably do like 10-15% Tibetan blood is present in Pahadis on average.
I actually don't tibeten people were largely isolated for most of the millenia, most admixture happened only around the last century or two.
 

Similar threads

underatedgreycel
Replies
9
Views
94
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
SamosaChutneyCel
Replies
8
Views
64
SamosaChutneyCel
SamosaChutneyCel
seven?
Replies
13
Views
165
1966Ford
1966Ford
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Replies
11
Views
73
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
MyDreamIsToBe183CM

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top