
Futura
Subhuman
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2024
- Posts
- 3,147
- Reputation
- 3,619
The main argument against is "no studies/evidence" (But there is no conclusive proof it's not possible)
Why the fuck would the eye industry ever do a study that literally collapses itself
Even if they did they would never publish the results if it showed it's possible
But they would if it showed it's impossible
Therefore the lack of conclusive evidence it's impossible means the chance it's possible is larger
Why the fuck would the eye industry ever do a study that literally collapses itself
Even if they did they would never publish the results if it showed it's possible
But they would if it showed it's impossible
Therefore the lack of conclusive evidence it's impossible means the chance it's possible is larger