Naming your children before or just after birth is stupid in most cases.

Debetro

Debetro

Joined
Jun 13, 2023
Posts
24,265
Reputation
33,147
Names are supposed to have a meaning and not be given because of just how cool they sound.

In the first years of the child's life you can't know much about the personality and physical attributes of them. These develop with time after years have passed. Unless a name does not have to do with these, it makes no sense to name a child Harvey ("battle worthy") to someone who will not grow "battle worthy" in the future and will be rather fragile and ill.

A proper way to do it, is naming your child at first depending on whether it's the first ("First"), second ("Second"), third ("Third")... child, representing the birth order in the family.

Then somewhere between the ages of 5-10, once the child has developed some attributes, you give them a suitable name.

Some exceptions would be if the name planned to be given is a seasonal one or is meant to reflect attitude toward the child ans whether it was longed for: Ivan ("gift of God"), Erazem ("desired/loved one"), Didier ("awaited one"), Nezhdan ("unexpected one")...

@cromagnon @slavicpsycho @hopecel @wishIwasSalludon @sportsmogger
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: JL~, Shrek2OnDvD, moodless and 10 others
Chud ass thread

OP is turning schizo on nofap I swear to God
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bakpaokukus, Bars, lemonnz and 1 other person
What if you inherit name by getting reborn as an ancestor
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Debetro
Substitutional names should be given rather than permanent ones when a child is born.
 
Mines going to be a bible name or family name :love:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Just call the nigga something like Saddam and pray his genetics allow him to grow a moustache.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars and Debetro
I agree whole heartedly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Daquavious
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MaghrebGator and Debetro
Name is cope. Our cave-crawling primitive ooga-booga ancestors never had them.
 
Well I don’t get what you mean bruh
Naming before being born is usually a good option
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Some exceptions would be if the name planned to be given is a seasonal one or is meant to reflect attitude toward the child ans whether it was longed for: Ivan ("gift of God"), Erazem ("desired/loved one"), Didier ("awaited one"), Nezhdan ("unexpected one")...
Jewish names falio. ideal names should have a surname ending like "jeet."
Dickshit
Ranjeet
Lundpreeet
 
  • JFL
Reactions: bakpaokukus and Bars
Names are supposed to have a meaning and not be given because of just how cool they sound.

In the first years of the child's life you can't know much about the personality and physical attributes of them. These develop with time after years have passed. Unless a name does not have to do with these, it makes no sense to name a child Harvey ("battle worthy") to someone who will not grow "battle worthy" in the future and will be rather fragile and ill.

A proper way to do it, is naming your child at first depending on whether it's the first ("First"), second ("Second"), third ("Third")... child, representing the birth order in the family.

Then somewhere between the ages of 5-10, once the child has developed some attributes, you give them a suitable name.

Some exceptions would be if the name planned to be given is a seasonal one or is meant to reflect attitude toward the child ans whether it was longed for: Ivan ("gift of God"), Erazem ("desired/loved one"), Didier ("awaited one"), Nezhdan ("unexpected one")...

@cromagnon @slavicpsycho @hopecel @wishIwasSalludon @sportsmogger
High iq but my baby is still gonna be named Adolf
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars and Debetro
I was named after a person :^D
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro

Similar threads

Gmogger
Replies
216
Views
4K
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
Acion
Replies
18
Views
2K
Pikabro
Pikabro
Subhra26
Replies
78
Views
6K
curryascenderr
C

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top