Narrow ribcage

Bitchwhipper2

Bitchwhipper2

Jingle-Bel-Cel
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Posts
13,115
Reputation
17,732
I got good clavicles and narrow hips, but my ribcage is small as fuck which failos the fuck outta my body

Will any amount of gymcelling and roiding ever fix this shit? Srs
 
  • +1
Reactions: bpcq and PsychoH
I got good clavicles and narrow hips, but my ribcage is small as fuck which failos the fuck outta my body

Will any amount of gymcelling and roiding ever fix this shit? Srs
yea work on lats
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2 and PsychoH
1736347275017
 
  • Woah
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: bpcq, Bitchwhipper2, Sceptical and 3 others
your transformation always amazes me but what was your bideltoid when you started? I have 19inch with 0 muscle but I aim for 22 if possible but seems hard idk
dont know it's never been a goal to focus on it my shoulders just grow better than everything else.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Idonwannalivthatway and PsychoH
dont know it's never been a goal to focus on it my shoulders just grow better than everything else.
do you think you can add less muscle if you have thin bones? I aim for 20kgs in several years of training but idk if it's possible due to shit thin bone structure. You already seemed to have very thick joints before that's why I'm asking
 
What’s your internipple distance?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
I got good clavicles and narrow hips, but my ribcage is small as fuck which failos the fuck outta my body

Will any amount of gymcelling and roiding ever fix this shit? Srs
Too big a ribcage is bad though. I width mog like 99.9% of guys and have a v taper as a literal fatass but my arms still hang horizontally :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:. I need clavicular lengthening :feelswah::feelswah::feelswah:
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
23cm

Is that good or bad?
It’s around average. Maybe even slightly on the higher side.

Only a proxy though, depends on several other factors.

I’d say it’s pretty unlikely to have very wide clavicles and a small ribcage.
Maybe your ribcage is just relatively lacking but still average or above in size
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
It’s around average. Maybe even slightly on the higher side.

Only a proxy though, depends on several other factors.

I’d say it’s pretty unlikely to have very wide clavicles and a small ribcage.
Maybe your ribcage is just relatively lacking but still average or above in size
Probably so.

Im also just assuming my clavicles are wide because my bidelt is just above 51cm unfrauded with meh muscle mass
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustHereToLooksmax
do you think you can add less muscle if you have thin bones? I aim for 20kgs in several years of training but idk if it's possible due to shit thin bone structure. You already seemed to have very thick joints before that's why I'm asking
it probably factors into it, but I personally prefer leaner less muscular physiques on men, and so do most other people.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2 and Idonwannalivthatway
Probably so.

Im also just assuming my clavicles are wide because my bidelt is just above 51cm unfrauded with meh muscle mass
Probably depends on your height.
51cm is extremely wide for untrained individuals and still above average for more muscular men.
However for guys 6‘2 and up, it may sit closer towards the average.
At least for well-trained men of that size.

Obviously inter-nipple distance is influenced by regional muscle and particularly fat development, so it’s less conclusive for obese or highly muscular men.
Nonetheless, nipple placement is highly depended on the underlying bone structure and genetics of the individual but several factors beyond rib cage size can influence that measurement.
So it may be more conclusive, when paired with several other anatomical measures like the biacromial for instance to gauge rib cage size.

Since the ribcage contributes significantly to the biacromial breadth, it’s pretty unlikely for someone to have a very narrow rib cage with disproportionately wide shoulders.
Average biacromial for Swedes of 180cm is around 41cm.
Assuming you are tall, the average may be closer to 42-44cm
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
Probably depends on your height.
51cm is extremely wide for untrained individuals and still above average for more muscular men.
However for guys 6‘2 and up, it may sit closer towards the average.
At least for well-trained men of that size.

Obviously inter-nipple distance is influenced by regional muscle and particularly fat development, so it’s less conclusive for obese or highly muscular men.
Nonetheless, nipple placement is highly depended on the underlying bone structure and genetics of the individual but several factors beyond rib cage size can influence that measurement.
So it may be more conclusive, when paired with several other anatomical measures like the biacromial for instance to gauge rib cage size.

Since the ribcage contributes significantly to the biacromial breadth, it’s pretty unlikely for someone to have a very narrow rib cage with disproportionately wide shoulders.
Average biacromial for Swedes of 180cm is around 41cm.
Assuming you are tall, the average may be closer to 42-44cm
Im not untrained btw. Im on one year semi consistent training.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoaA99

Similar threads

geneticloser
Replies
26
Views
733
chaddyboi66
chaddyboi66
EliDKing
Replies
5
Views
67
fezzz
F
swaggerdoodle
Replies
26
Views
341
IrishSlayer1483
I
Bheimal
Replies
28
Views
470
ThePrinceOfPersia
ThePrinceOfPersia
Bitchwhipper2
Looksmax Poor lips seal
Replies
14
Views
170
craven
craven

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top